How would you change coh 2?
25 Mar 2018, 11:56 AM
#21
Posts: 823 | Subs: 3
i would change Hotkeis Kappa
Me: I am scared, that i will need to shake ma head the same as when i read ur posts, so i rather not
Katitof: Its not even close to me even at my worst in the past, imagine ullu, incendiary, aaa, vetlolcake and disto merge into one mega axis zord with forcefield protecting it from accepting any factual data. Add to that a victim card(his rumblings at my PM).
Katitof: Its not even close to me even at my worst in the past, imagine ullu, incendiary, aaa, vetlolcake and disto merge into one mega axis zord with forcefield protecting it from accepting any factual data. Add to that a victim card(his rumblings at my PM).
25 Mar 2018, 12:12 PM
#22
Posts: 713 | Subs: 2
remove brits and houses
26 Mar 2018, 08:32 AM
#23
Posts: 1740
One thing I'd love to see added, I mean coh 1 had it.
Random faction choice
Maybe I don't know who I want to play as
I think they didn't implement that to CoH2 because of the commander system.
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
26 Mar 2018, 10:51 AM
#24
Posts: 60
I think they didn't implement that to CoH2 because of the commander system.
There are preset loadouts for the factions that could be used though. My guess is that they didn't because there were just 2 factions in the game to begin with
26 Mar 2018, 11:13 AM
#25
Posts: 1740
There are preset loadouts for the factions that could be used though. My guess is that they didn't because there were just 2 factions in the game to begin with
Which was the same in vCoH at the beginning aswell, but that game had the system :-)
But I think you're right... You could simply implement a checkbox "Use this loadout as standard".
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
26 Mar 2018, 13:12 PM
#26
Posts: 682
The game has been matching me against people way better than I am, consistently, for days, at all times.
After ten losses in a row, against people way out of my league, I just feel like giving up.
The automatching needs to not crush people like me. It's so demoralizing...
After ten losses in a row, against people way out of my league, I just feel like giving up.
The automatching needs to not crush people like me. It's so demoralizing...
/s
26 Mar 2018, 15:19 PM
#27
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The game has been matching me against people way better than I am, consistently, for days, at all times.
After ten losses in a row, against people way out of my league, I just feel like giving up.
The automatching needs to not crush people like me. It's so demoralizing...
That is not something that relic can fix.
If there is no one queuing at the time with your skill, you'll be matched against better or worse player to not sit 3h in a queue.
Even the best matchmaking system in the universe will be considered broken if there will be not enough players to choose from.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
26 Mar 2018, 16:54 PM
#28
Posts: 682
I'd rather wait fifteen minutes to be matched a tad closer than try to put up a good fight and get crushed in 20 or 30.
And you're right, relic can't fix shit.
And you're right, relic can't fix shit.
/s
26 Mar 2018, 16:57 PM
#29
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I'd rather wait fifteen minutes to be matched a tad closer than try to put up a good fight and get crushed in 20 or 30.
And you're right, relic can't fix shit.
Let me ask you this:
Why do you believe matchmaking takes 10-15 mins right now, compared to say, SC2, which matches you up in seconds?
You're asking for impossible, because you dismiss what it requires to work.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
26 Mar 2018, 17:15 PM
#30
Posts: 682
Except I wasn't waiting fifteen minutes. That was you. I was waiting between thirty seconds to five minutes. It was pretty damn quick. I know there isn't a huge gulf in a rank 115 person and a rank 25 or higher, but there is. I get how it works. The player pool is smaller. That's why I suggested a longer wait - to give people the opportunity to get on the game and be matched with like players.
Asking for the impossible would be asking you to not be a complete twat. This forum was a better place when you were banned.
Asking for the impossible would be asking you to not be a complete twat. This forum was a better place when you were banned.
/s
26 Mar 2018, 22:28 PM
#31
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Other games with 5 to 10 more population have the same problems. Because this games doesn't have a difference between quick play and ranked, you can't have a specific search for only "balanced" games.
It's not weird having a 5/10 min clause for YOLO QUEUE on most games, which you get matched against anything. IIRC CoH2 is set to be at 5min YOLO. IF you want better games, you would have to reset search every 2 mins or so.
PD: it also matters whether you are playing on non peak hours.
It's not weird having a 5/10 min clause for YOLO QUEUE on most games, which you get matched against anything. IIRC CoH2 is set to be at 5min YOLO. IF you want better games, you would have to reset search every 2 mins or so.
PD: it also matters whether you are playing on non peak hours.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
28 Mar 2018, 16:58 PM
#32
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
remove brits and houses
remove base making, and neutral houses, shacks and anything on the map?
do bunkers and trenches count as houses?
Are OKW trucks 'houses' ? Are only OKW allowed to have them?
What about Emplacements?
People complain the Soviets are useless.
Well, they are useless if you fight your units 1vs1. But they are all about Synergy.
What do I care if you have a Panther? Once you are crippled from running over a mine
I wait until you repair it with your 3x SturmPioneers and tell my 3x Mortars to fire at it.
did you know Vet 1 Mortars get FLARE?!
- 900 Manpower down the drain. - Panther still can't move worth a damn.
Well, they are useless if you fight your units 1vs1. But they are all about Synergy.
What do I care if you have a Panther? Once you are crippled from running over a mine
I wait until you repair it with your 3x SturmPioneers and tell my 3x Mortars to fire at it.
did you know Vet 1 Mortars get FLARE?!
- 900 Manpower down the drain. - Panther still can't move worth a damn.
28 Mar 2018, 17:03 PM
#33
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
remove base making, and neutral houses, shacks and anything on the map?
do bunkers and trenches count as houses?
Are OKW trucks 'houses' ? Are only OKW allowed to have them?
What about Emplacements?
By houses she is probably referring to ambient buildings.
28 Mar 2018, 17:05 PM
#34
Posts: 515
I think a big issue with large team games is map resources. In CoH1, 3v3 and 4v4 player maps consisted almost entirely of low resource points, which meant that the large maps could be designed to contain the same resources as 1v1 and 2v2 maps. With CoH2s simplified resource system, this isn't possible, which I believe contributes to the imbalances between 1v1 and 3v3/4v4.
Therefore, if CoH3 reverts back to the old resource system, with high/medium/low types of points for each resource, this would be a step in the right direction.
Therefore, if CoH3 reverts back to the old resource system, with high/medium/low types of points for each resource, this would be a step in the right direction.
28 Mar 2018, 18:14 PM
#35
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I think a big issue with large team games is map resources. In CoH1, 3v3 and 4v4 player maps consisted almost entirely of low resource points, which meant that the large maps could be designed to contain the same resources as 1v1 and 2v2 maps. With CoH2s simplified resource system, this isn't possible, which I believe contributes to the imbalances between 1v1 and 3v3/4v4.
Therefore, if CoH3 reverts back to the old resource system, with high/medium/low types of points for each resource, this would be a step in the right direction.
https://www.coh2.org/topic/61229/resource-income-per-game-mode/page/1#post_id609470
I don't think resources is as much of a problem as number of units fielded and specially number of units assigned to each VP and position on the map.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
28 Mar 2018, 18:18 PM
#36
Posts: 15
first of all: remove the auto-firing, laser guided mortars and their wipe potential! of course for all factions.
28 Mar 2018, 18:42 PM
#37
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
first of all: remove the auto-firing, laser guided mortars and their wipe potential! of course for all factions.
The only mortar in game that is still an issue is ost sniper turbo mortar.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
28 Mar 2018, 23:09 PM
#38
Posts: 515
And please, if there will be snipers, have them all 1 man squads. Soviet snipers are just ...
29 Mar 2018, 02:13 AM
#39
Posts: 960
The only mortar in game that is still an issue is ost sniper turbo mortar.
I would add the Soviet 120mm to that. Being able to retreat with 1 model combined with its massive range and AOE is just too much, especially in team games.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
29 Mar 2018, 03:48 AM
#40
92 Posts: 374
i'd put fuel upkeep on my vehicles, ammo upkeep on upgrades and team weapons, I feel this would push people into thinking more about what to build then just blindly building something.
I am not sure but that is an opinion.
I suggest this time and time again in the past,
I'm not sure, but what are thoughts to this opinion?
I am not sure but that is an opinion.
I suggest this time and time again in the past,
I'm not sure, but what are thoughts to this opinion?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
969 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.1109614.644+10
- 4.608220.734+2
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
490 users are online:
490 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49112
Welcome our newest member, Buchh647
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Buchh647
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM