pzgren should be wehr's dedicated tank hunters

Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2018, 14:11 PMKatitof

Which also was my point, if you managed to actually comprehend what you have read.

I have said there was a strict formula, which was used for reinforcing costs and after some time it was not as strictly followed as plenty of exceptions appeard, you denied existence of the formula in the first place, I have proven you otherwise.


No one ever said a word about this being advantage or not, there was a simple statement that majority of axis infantry are subjects to the exception from the rule.

Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2018, 07:59 AMVipper

There is no reinforcement cost reduction the rule simply does not apply.

Most of the units that had their cost changed simply do not follow the original rule of reinforcement cost and that includes a number of allied units.

Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2018, 16:22 PMVipper

Is there really any point in continuing this other than an obsession to prove me wrong?

My original post clearly states that their was a rule that simply does not apply any more.


You also mentioned only axis infantry being cheaper to reinforce as if it was only exclusive to them, which is actually misleading.

The only reason I even bothered to reply is because you continue to put words in my mouth, pls stop it.

I have no intention to reply to any more post that are irrelevant to AT PGs, so you can have the lest word if you want.