So new AT commander anyone?Give OKW 88flak guns?
What's this?
You can actually see what it is if play OKW or hover you mouse over the icon.
It is pak 43 not a flak 88.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
So new AT commander anyone?Give OKW 88flak guns?
What's this?
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
You can actually see what it is if play OKW or hover you mouse over the icon.
It is pak 43 not a flak 88.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
You can actually see what it is if play OKW or hover you mouse over the icon.
It is pak 43 not a flak 88.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Do you want to know what Pak43 and flak88 have in common?
I'm eager to tell you, but I know you're smart boi and can figure it out yourself too!
Care to explain the difference regarding the gameplay?
Posts: 2243
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Yeas sure, one exist in the game the other does not.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
But what would the Flak88 bring to the table, that the Pak43 doesn't already offer?
Posts: 164
Typical response.
Allied blobs nearly aren't as powerfull against german armor because of the difference between penetration rates and heavier german armor values(Panzershreck pens waaaay more frequently than the M9 and PTRS). Not to mention rifles and penals are more expensive to build and reinforce, something that the volksgrens dont have as a downside.
Posts: 249
While I understand your point (the current allied blob is slightly less powerful than the OKW blob from 18 months ago), but how does that justify allied blobbing?
Blobbing from any faction is an issue that needs to be address. Blobbing breaks the core game-play principles of COH; cover, positioning, and strategic unit use.
With regards to the whether or not the OKW needs better AT infantry - no, they need a better AT gun.
24 | |||||
2 | |||||
324 | |||||
211 | |||||
15 | |||||
11 | |||||
10 | |||||
6 | |||||
5 | |||||
3 |