Login

russian armor

Penals op

PAGES (7)down
5 May 2017, 13:31 PM
#21
avatar of Maret

Posts: 711

I like Ægion's suggestions

His suggestions are good, but i think range of snare could be increased to 30 if you are building t4, to help fighting against late armor in late game phase.
5 May 2017, 14:25 PM
#22
avatar of Nano

Posts: 212

In the last game ally was complaining that 2x Penal sticky killed his full HP P4.

If it's true.... We are in a sticky situation.
5 May 2017, 14:30 PM
#23
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Tho I think Penals are fine in current state, they won't be fine after fixing Cons.
Like mentioned here, I raised such point months ago - you cannot balance Penals with Cons out of scope and then balance Cons with Penals ouf of scope. It's a dead end.

It would be better idea (I guess) to balance Penals like Cons were in the scope, then crawl few month with them until Cons are in scope.

Right now they are quite fine, but once Cons will be touched, they won't be. So you either get X months with not well designed Penals but after that everything is fine or you get X months with well done Penals but then much more time with screwed balance between Penals and Cons.

Unless Penals will be included in scope again but I hardly imagine that.
5 May 2017, 14:37 PM
#24
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 14:25 PMNano
In the last game ally was complaining that 2x Penal sticky killed his full HP P4.

If it's true.... We are in a sticky situation.

Satchel seems to have 340 damage so it should be passable.
5 May 2017, 15:01 PM
#25
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned

Like mentioned here, I raised such point months ago - you cannot balance Penals with Cons out of scope and then balance Cons with Penals ouf of scope. It's a dead end.

It would be better idea (I guess) to balance Penals like Cons were in the scope, then crawl few month with them until Cons are in scope.


This, i write same, you cannot balance some units, coz thay have synergy with another. and after change you will be must rework unit.
5 May 2017, 15:15 PM
#26
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Penal SVTs are rather bugged/inconsistent. The cooldown modifier is unaffected by range and it actually is reduced when penals are moving.

6 months of feedback on penals wasn't ever going to change what happened. What happened with penals was exactly what the mod team wanted, independent of feedback. At best feedback was deciding how many ptrs they get.
5 May 2017, 15:34 PM
#27
avatar of Dyzfunction

Posts: 73

A blob of vetted Penals has extremely high DPS.

Personally I think the DPS of penals should be lowered only very, very slightly and the sticky satchel should be removed but the regular satchel retained.

Not every single infantry unit in the game needs a snare. It's kind of ridiculous. Unless you have heavy tanks that resist snares better, it seems like almost every infantry unit in the game running around can snare you. And since blobbing is so frequent in larger game modes and with munis being fairly plentiful late game, it's really not uncommon for a Panther to turn a corner and find 3-4 squads of penals there (which the panther can do nothing about since it's a terrible tank) and get 3 satchels stuck to it and then it's blown up.
5 May 2017, 16:05 PM
#28
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Penal SVTs are rather bugged/inconsistent. The cooldown modifier is unaffected by range and it actually is reduced when penals are moving.

Well SVT is carbine (semi auto) weapon with the far DPS of bolt action rifle in a squad with high accuracy vet bonuses...

Relic did its best work on small arm fire in September Patch when it balanced all infantry available before minute 1 with weapon profiles and relative positioning. They should simply do the same factor in all the thing that have changed since then.
5 May 2017, 18:21 PM
#29
5 May 2017, 19:00 PM
#30
avatar of Dangerous-Cloth

Posts: 2066

If you let your p4 get sticky satchelled by 2 penals at the same time, you are doing something wrong!
5 May 2017, 19:38 PM
#31
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

jump backJump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 16:05 PMVipper

Well SVT is carbine (semi auto) weapon with the far DPS of bolt action rifle in a squad with high accuracy vet bonuses...

Relic did its best work on small arm fire in September Patch when it balanced all infantry available before minute 1 with weapon profiles and relative positioning. They should simply do the same factor in all the thing that have changed since then.


Sort of. Other carbines have cooldown modifiers that increase with range from the target. In fact every single rifle and lmg and smg has this except for penals svts.

Penals dps comes from the fact that they shoot fast. They have long range dps due to that rate of fire, not because of damage or accuracy.

They shoot even faster while moving, which is also unique.
5 May 2017, 19:52 PM
#32
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

They shoot even faster while moving, which is also unique.

Actually, I think G43s have that too. Technically, just about every handheld automatic weapon also has a faster cooldown from moving, but they'll also have a shorter burst duration and lower accuracy at the same time anyway.
5 May 2017, 20:01 PM
#33
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

jump backJump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 19:52 PMVuther

Actually, I think G43s have that too. Technically, just about every handheld automatic weapon also has a faster cooldown from moving, but they'll also have a shorter burst duration and lower accuracy at the same time anyway.


You may he right but I believe g43s just have a great moving accuracy multiplier of 0.8. Guards mosins come next at 0.75.

But I'm pretty sure the cooldown modifiers for all rifles and carbines increase firing times. And this multiplier is still affected by range unlike svts.
5 May 2017, 20:15 PM
#34
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13



You may he right but I believe g43s just have a great moving accuracy multiplier of 0.8. Guards mosins come next at 0.75.

But I'm pretty sure the cooldown modifiers for all rifles and carbines increase firing times. And this multiplier is still affected by range unlike svts.


G43s also have a 0.5 cooldown on the move. Not the most important note for these semi-autos as their cooldowns aren't that high to begin with as most of their delay is in aim-time. Penals don't have the aim-time penalties, but have 0.5 accuracy on the move instead.

Paratrooper carbines have 0.25 if we want to go lower :O
5 May 2017, 20:20 PM
#35
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1



G43s also have a 0.5 cooldown on the move. Not the most important note for these semi-autos as their cooldowns aren't that high to begin with as most of their delay is in aim-time. Penals don't have the aim-time penalties, but have 0.5 accuracy on the move instead.

Paratrooper carbines have 0.25 if we want to go lower :O

Ah, ok, thank you. And with that, me and Francis' conversation ends :p
aaa
5 May 2017, 21:03 PM
#36
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487

jump backJump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 04:30 AMBravus
Soviet are bad, but penals are crazy op now, wtf?


that

initial statememt is 100% self contradictory

= silly. OP didnt even notice that. Not just wrong statement as ussualy. People still seriously discussing it.
5 May 2017, 21:17 PM
#37
avatar of Outsider_Sidaroth

Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1



G43s also have a 0.5 cooldown on the move. Not the most important note for these semi-autos as their cooldowns aren't that high to begin with as most of their delay is in aim-time. Penals don't have the aim-time penalties, but have 0.5 accuracy on the move instead.

Paratrooper carbines have 0.25 if we want to go lower :O


0.25?
No wonder they have such high DPS!
5 May 2017, 21:29 PM
#38
avatar of borobadger

Posts: 184

Yeah to be fair it makes sense. Every decent Soviet unit has been nerfed into the ground so Penals might as well follow them. Why not give them the same stats as cons?
5 May 2017, 21:34 PM
#39
avatar of capiqua
Senior Mapmaker Badge

Posts: 985 | Subs: 2

Ægion's suggestions; I like an early game this way, almost all the changes are good.:clap:
5 May 2017, 22:32 PM
#40
avatar of skyshark

Posts: 239

honestly, i'd go the other way with aegion's suggestions... every faction should start with a combat unit. this is inhibited by EFA's design, since they have to build a structure right off the bat and the WFA armies don't. starting with engineers/pios/REs is a handicap, especially with brit IS and OKW sturms available from the get-go.

that said, the variety makes life interesting, so maybe don't change anything...
PAGES (7)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

687 users are online: 687 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49851
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM