April 25th Update

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 07:45 AMullumulu

Hmm. I make threads about unbalanced and Op shit. And..whats comes?


The Team decided that its true.

examples?
- I said that the commander upgrade from brits is totally OP ...u get such a huge improvement from this commander...for only 25 ammo. >>>changed
- I said that the double mg on USF is totally op... >>changed
- i said that the salvage from brits commander is totally op >>> changed
- i said that the arti cover from brits commander is totally op >>> changed
- i said that the maxim is totally unbalanced >>> changed
- i said that the axis squad need a bigger formation size/ models clumb to much >>> changed

more and more and more...

for all of this i made a tread/ long post / repeatings...


and we got the fixes for that.

nice, right?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 12:42 PMvoltardark

So your saying that it's cause of you that the larger team formats are in such a bad shape ?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 05:58 AMmycalliope

you forgot the part where comet has superior vet,and is got tier against infy and support weapons which pnather doesn't so considering that comet > pnather.....please stop the dozens of you allied fanboys which keep whining the most in forums have made the game unbalanced in first place

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 13:04 PMullumulu

Troll.

It means that im not a cry baby without brain....maybe i cry if somethin is really op and has to nerf...and so..they nerfed/ changed the things i cried after.

and they will nerded LM too..where i made a poll about this Op shit unit, which give no time to react. mabe the heard it ..and now it will be nerfed.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 13:44 PMCresc

Real question here.
Is there ever going to be a nerf for the MG42? This unit is clearly overperforming but since this board is practically an axis fanboy nest, nobody talks much about its performance.

So when is this thing gonna get the nerf ?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 10:53 AMTatatala

I'd also like to see the ridiculous cover bonus/penalty for Tommies gone... so many maps and situations make it massively in favour of the tommies or massively against the favour of the Tommies... It's fine for flavour units like Ostruppen, but mainline inf? Not really.

You can't always pick and choose engagements, when certain strategic points need to be taken.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 15:17 PMCresc

But the MG42 is OP, why not ? It's a blatant fact, for no more than 260mp you get a non-doctrinal DSHK from tier 0 that can even pen light vehicles for ONLY 15 ammunition.


Now the maxim is getting trashed every single patch, I've never seen any use of the USF hmg either.


So when are you going to nerf Vickers and MG42?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 12:42 PMvoltardark

So your saying that it's cause of you that the larger team formats are in such a bad shape ?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 07:20 AMTickTack

Another quality post from you - I guess you're talking about Volks?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 09:37 AMskemshead

I really cannot see why smoke is necessary at vet 0. In my experience it rewards bad play,
ie overextending, not planting defensive mines, not supporting cromwell with at guns. So often I see brits yolo around with AEC (expect same from cromwells soon), drive straight into pack wall etc and then shit themselves, pop smoke and piss off back to safely.

IMHO brits need to screw up to loose AEC or cromwell when they first hit field and smoke is now an added safeguard.

Although, i do find lag being a crucial factor too on many occasions.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 15:17 PMCresc

But the MG42 is OP, why not ? It's a blatant fact, for no more than 260mp you get a non-doctrinal DSHK from tier 0 that can even pen light vehicles for ONLY 15 ammunition.


Now the maxim is getting trashed every single patch, I've never seen any use of the USF hmg either.


So when are you going to nerf Vickers and MG42?

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 15:33 PMBulgakov

You've been complaining about larger team formats since forever, despite myriad changes and despite recent allied hegemony. I'd say it's more your perception of the game that's in bad shape.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 17:07 PMvoltardark

Please could you start reading my posts from the first one which should be around 4 years ago, and you will see that i still focus on the same points.

Balanced enough to be fun in all formats.

You comments clearly show that you are more centered on yourself then on the well being of the game.
It's that kind of selfish behavior that had slowdown the balancing process.

You must think of all people who play the game not only you.

So could you refrain from commenting my posts if you don't have anything constructive to say.

That would be very welcome.

Thanks.


Double post,plz remove. thx.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 17:36 PMBulgakov

"more centered on yourself then on the well being of the game"
That's the pot calling the kettle black

1000+ posts you've made all about how UP the allies are and how OP the Axis is.


And dude, really, you spat your dummy out recently and trounced off "leaving the game". Like Miley Cyrus and Madonna claimed before Trump got elected. And just like them, you're still around. What kind of person does that, I dunno... I'd be too ashamed after throwing a tantrum in front of everyone like that.



Please do also think of all the people who play the game, not just allied 4v4 players.


This update is great, it has opened up tons of new possibilities and tuned down all kinds of OP nonsense. You should be glad that the game has become more level. Not complaining that your favourite OP toys got taken away.

Annnnnd, adieu!

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 17:56 PMvoltardark

Stay blind if you like it.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2017, 17:56 PMvoltardark

Stay blind if you like it.