Vanilla factions vs DLC factions
Posts: 44
Alongside these teir bonuses the new factions do not have to use a pio/engineer to build the new teir. This means old factions get no/little bonus and have waste engineer time. I am not saying that the factions should be homogenized but it seems that the new factions have a step up on the old ones.
If someone knows how this balances out please tell me. The only thing i could see is maybe less manpower to tech but I am unsure this is the case.
Thanks and I welcome flaming
Posts: 1003
Hi, I have always wondered this and before you accuse me of knowing nothing about balance, I am not saying this is not balanced. But anyway, how does it balance out that sov/wehr get no bonuses from teching whereas USA get a unit for every teir level (LT, Capt, Maj), OKW get a forward building (med, mech and flak)and british get artillery ability. I understand that Wehr unlock rifle nade/mg ability so maybe that discounts the british teiring.
Alongside these teir bonuses the new factions do not have to use a pio/engineer to build the new teir. This means old factions get no/little bonus and have waste engineer time. I am not saying that the factions should be homogenized but it seems that the new factions have a step up on the old ones.
If someone knows how this balances out please tell me. The only thing i could see is maybe less manpower to tech but I am unsure this is the case.
Thanks and I welcome flaming
What Ostheer can do, OKW do it better.
Posts: 2066
I think a lot of things/ideas were scrapped from the Vanilla factions to simply reach and/or realize the launch of CoH2. These ideas and utilities you now find in the DLC factions.
Posts: 44
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Because the DLC factions were designed later. Relic released CoH2 in a time when their previous publisher, THQ, went bankrupt. They had to push CoH2 out in a state that most certainly didn't match their intended conceptual design completely.
I think a lot of things/ideas were scrapped from the Vanilla factions to simply reach and/or realize the launch of CoH2. These ideas and utilities you now find in the DLC factions.
Thats actually a well thought out explanation.
yeah i get that cloth, but there have been many patches since to fix. Lelic
Patches to fix what mate?
You do realise they aren't very much interested in patching right?
It means throwing money for a resource to plug those holes (lets face it, money Relic does not have)
Posts: 2066
yeah i get that cloth, but there have been many patches since to fix. Lelic
I see, well then I don´t know lol
Posts: 935
Posts: 632 | Subs: 1
But I agree, EF factions are disadvantaged in that regard. They're better in other areas though. ...Right?
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
It's called asymmetric balance
But I agree, EF factions are disadvantaged in that regard. They're better in other areas though. ...Right?
Bullshit balance if you ask me.
And lol, what Araden said, what the East does the West can do it better
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Because the DLC factions were designed later. Relic released CoH2 in a time when their previous publisher, THQ, went bankrupt. They had to push CoH2 out in a state that most certainly didn't match their intended conceptual design completely.
I think a lot of things/ideas were scrapped from the Vanilla factions to simply reach and/or realize the launch of CoH2. These ideas and utilities you now find in the DLC factions.
This.
The game was released in a hardly finished mode, large bugs remained that even made play hard in some cases. For instance, at release the Su85's out ranged pak guns and could snipe crews, got no debuffs for focus forward and even had infantry detection to help them do this, this kind of stuff does not make it through good play testing and balancing before launch. DLC came much later when new ideas could be built in.
How do you balance it now? Well you could make units that come from stock factions more powerful by a slight margin to help them, you could offer them more tools, etc. There are many ways to do so.
Posts: 2066
Posts: 44
Posts: 2742
The problems have been with USF versus OST and OKW versus SOV since the beginning.
Brits... Well, nevermind Brits. They're a special snowflake.
(I think it's also worth noting that the exact same was true with the expansion factions in CoH1.)
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
The fact the games pacing as well as some other issues to be adressed eventually make the US vs Wehr matchup a bit one sided aren't really related to their design which has the feature of FREE SQUADS.
Posts: 2243
They get a big noobiness bonus through their good units and cancer emplacments, call ins and bonuses.
so in most teamgames they can play with a cup of tea..in both hands.
Posts: 525
Veto factions LeLic
Posts: 474
Why can't you play as vanilla just versus vanilla faction...I mean,this was intended to be a Eastern Front game when the first trailers came out...Ost vs Sov and Sov vs Ost
Veto factions LeLic
Because there are not enough players to make that viable. If you could veto factions the waiting times would be huge.
Posts: 525
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
You have the experience from what vanilla factions can do and can't do and suddenly you want to overcome that and provide a new faction with different design: Vanilla factions have stock flamethrowers, DLC factions will not but have FRP because it's cool, vanilla factions don't have it and it brings new strategical experience.
The problem comes from the fact that you can't really propose a lot of faction design on a strategy game if you want to keep them balanced.
You can make two different factions with a lot of asymmetrical aspect, but 3,4 or 5 factions. It simply doesn't work.
Instead of building a deepest strategical game by providing more dept in both Ostheer and Soviet factions like for example improving and innovating in the Commander point system of the game or bulletins or providing different stock upgrade like they did for the Brit. they went to more factions and less game design.
Probably because it is easier to sell a DLC containing new factions, to reach the US market better with the USF faction and then the UK market.
Posts: 273
Alongside these teir bonuses the new factions do not have to use a pio/engineer to build the new teir. This means old factions get no/little bonus and have waste engineer time. I am not saying that the factions should be homogenized but it seems that the new factions have a step up on the old ones.
Cause they are new and new dlcs allways need to be sold well.
Livestreams
109 | |||||
62 | |||||
3 | |||||
68 | |||||
18 | |||||
18 | |||||
16 | |||||
13 | |||||
5 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Wallis15
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM