Buff? Why? It's probably best medium-medium tank.
we wouldn't be having this discussion if the sherman is the " best medium-medium tank". USF late game is infamously weak without the pershing or calliope DLC.
Posts: 1930
Buff? Why? It's probably best medium-medium tank.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
we wouldn't be having this discussion if the sherman is the " best medium-medium tank". USF late game is infamously weak without the pershing or calliope DLC.
Posts: 4928
This and this.
"What will their commanders have now, then?" is just the start.
Or perhaps add more T34/85 to the commanders
We need more Elite Ace T3485s
As a adding MG34 and PzIV for OKW?
and the t34 76 is actually pretty decent right now. 75 sherman just need a buff.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
You can't have health, penetration, damage, turret and speed.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Cromwell say hi
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Well not really. Cromwell is great at crushing but Sherman has HE shells, AT shells have biggest penetration, plus crew repairs and great smoke.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Cromwell smoke is better if it wasnt bugged (just lelic things). Cromwell doesnt need to switch shells because he can crush infantry and still defeat panzer.
Maybe it comes to a personal preference but I think cromwell is better than sherman.
Also comet packs all of these stats + war speed + 70 range fosoforus smoke, but we all know comet is "a bit over the top".
Posts: 4928
Cromwell say hi
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
exactly, more health for m36 would be osom
Posts: 485 | Subs: 1
T-34/85 and M4A3 (76) are two of the most produced tanks in WW2, 4 times more produced than the panther/ PZ4, yet relic decides to lock it behind some doctrines(and M4A3 (76) is not even in multiplayer) , I wish to see these beautiful generalist tank came into action without the limitation of commanders for years, and yet OKW pz4 became non-doctrinal just for weeks before ppl starts demanding it.
Please let political correctness aside and Axis armor superiority aside , make T-34/85 non-doctrinal and M4A3 (76) in BOB campaign non-doctrinal!
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 4928
I know right, how nice it would be not to die in 2 KT shots, 3 AT shots, or 4 Shreck shots.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
It should be a glass cannon, it's not supposed to win in a slug fest. If it could, why would you make Shermans?
Posts: 4928
Vs Infantry?
Posts: 954
I agree from a purely realism perspective but from a gameplay and balance perspective it'd be problematic and extremely unlikely.
Upgrade for their guns in their respective buildings like in the Tank Depot for the American Army in COH? I'd agree with that, in fact I had the same idea, just never really did fully realize it sadly.
I know that it seems like lame to be using the 75mm sherman and the t34 76, but adding the t34 85 and E8 would just marginalize the base variant even further.
and the t34 76 is actually pretty decent right now. 75 sherman just need a buff.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
The meta would be M36 Jacksons and M8 Scotts, there wouldn't be much need for M4 Shermans.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
these two tanks are so much easier to deal with than the comet, panther ROF buff will solve the problem.(and I want it)
Good call, make the T34/85 up-gun available after constructing tier 4, and make M4A3 (76) available after murica get their capatain or so.
The base variant is already outdated in front of panthers Jadgpanzer 4 and the non-doc KTs, and from game-play perspective T-34/85 and M4A3 (76) isn't a greater threat compare to the firefly/churchill or Comets , and BTW, the M4A3 (76) is a M4A3 with a 76mm gun mounted turret, not the wide track E8 version, it's been locked in BOB campaign
Posts: 1108
Posts: 455
Posts: 875 | Subs: 6
15 | |||||
5 | |||||
244 | |||||
7 | |||||
6 | |||||
5 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 |