+1
Vasa pls
Posts: 2066
Posts: 181
That is the best way to speak your ideas. Uploading a polished mod with full explanation regarding the changes.
And those of us making mods to suggest changes are just muddying the waters and being systematically ignored by both the mod team and the community that want to have their voice heard through official channels.
Also it seems the quantity of replay submissions seems to be the metric of authority.TBH, this 'replay pls/Out of scope' answer is a way to divert attention, dodge responsibility and mask own incompetence. Unless someone is shouting something like "OMG 222 is OP please remove the MG", there is no reason to shoot people providing valuable, formatted quality feedback with such answers.
Which is a little problematic since recording replays can render the game unplayable for many.
Posts: 773
TBH, this 'replay pls/Out of scope' answer is a way to divert attention, dodge responsibility and mask own incompetence. Unless someone is shouting something like "OMG 222 is OP please remove the MG", there is no reason to shoot people providing valuable, formatted quality feedback with such answers.
Posts: 149
Jesus. Just make penals similar to riflemen. Just decrease thier fucking vet, give them dp and make them cost 280. Done.
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
If you play a mod, you know, that flak HT arrive at 4-5 min in the game, its to early.
Posts: 213
You know what would change the game for the better?
Halving the mg42 set-up time while narrowing it's arc of fire by a half as well.
That would tlead to the cool dynamic coh1 "positioning mg's vs flanking mg's" mechanic in early game
but what do i know....
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
But that's not the point
Point is that unlocking 251/17 by Medics is kinda stupid.
It's like unlocking Katusha by T4 and... let's say molotovs /logic
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1
Stark pls, lets make 5 factions like one standard, lets make mirror factions, if you have trouble vs demo from 2013 its really strange. If demo are so problem why in 1v1 ESL tourney we see it few times ? I only remeber Noggano demo vs Asten and Jesulin. If you whanna balance game why you dont write about dive bomb ? flayers from com panther doc, com panther vet, scope ? molotovs ? cons ? callins problem ? Stug E spam ?
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
Or better one: T34/85 can be fielded sometimes too fast, so you need to research AT Nades and molo first
Posts: 9
Posts: 380
AT Nades and molotov should be lock at T1/T2 the same for brits and USF. If diversity is what we want, we need changes like this.firstly we need to buff Molotov, cus they are shit
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
firstly we need to buff Molotov, cus they are shit
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1
...
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
...
Biggest problem is range. Before bulletins "fix" you could stac 3x7% which made them useful but right now... eh....
Posts: 976
Posts: 409 | Subs: 17
Those changes would take not weeks but months, team'd increase triply and as we all know at the end we would get game with plenty of bugs which would take another months to balance and bugfix.
The idea is great but it's only utopia.
Posts: 15
Posts: 301
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
TBH, this 'replay pls/Out of scope' answer is a way to divert attention, dodge responsibility and mask own incompetence. Unless someone is shouting something like "OMG 222 is OP please remove the MG", there is no reason to shoot people providing valuable, formatted quality feedback with such answers.
Take your tinfoil hat off pal, the majority of people will be saying X is OP Y is UP! without any evidence to back it up, put yourself in their shoes, are you going to look at each complaint manually, try to set up the scenario you spoke about, replicate it X amount of times OR ask for a replay and examine it?
You know what would change the game for the better?
Halving the mg42 set-up time while narrowing it's arc of fire by a half as well.
The coh1 Wher-US matchup is probably still unparalleled in demonstrating coh gameplay and mechanics at its best, even though the Wher-Sov matchup does a decent job also.
AT Nades and molotov should be lock at T1/T2 the same for brits and USF. If diversity is what we want, we need changes like this.