Posts: 1072
Rocket artillery?
USSR: Non-doctrinal
UKF: Doctrinal
USF: Doctrinal
OKW: Non-doctrinal
Wher: Non-doctrinal
Just an observation.
Posts: 175
USF has the best positions with their blobbing into pershing or calliope tactic.
Posts: 911
USF: Doctrinal
Posts: 2066
I know it's really complicated but check their weapon upgrades, if they are upgraded with AI tools then you can send your Panzers, if they have AT upgrades send your Ubersoldaten.
Sounds simple enough right?
Posts: 362
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Those jacksons, su85s and comets will make good work of your Panzer IVs and brumbahrs
Posts: 2066
You mean that Tank Destroyers can kill tanks!? AMAZING!!!
This sounds like Allies are building a well rounded "combined arms" force that can take on just about anything, isn't this like, what the game is supposed to be about?
Comets are really strong though, I'll admit that but, I think they are pricey enough to be justified, whining and overnerfing the Churchill, is what caused this.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
You do understand that Allied rocket artillery, which is now well beyond established meta, will annihilate Axis combined arms?
Posts: 2066
Considering only Soviets get Rocket Artillery baseline, I would say that it's fine those commanders are meta, missing basic tools such as mines, flamethrowers, AT snares and rocket artillery sucks you know?
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
You are trying to imply that USF and UKF are less powefull with their current meta commanders whilst missing these fundamentals you are talking about? Do you even play the game xd?
Posts: 2066
I didn't imply anything like that, I just said they pay for their advantages with some disadvantages, and I do play the game! Not as often as I used to, as I been kinda sickly and busy with studies, but my playercard is here for you to see it.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
I see. Well it isn't really paying for your shortcommings when you can simply reliably count on one or two doctrines to give you the upper hand throughout the game. These shortcommings don't seem to be shortcommings, since USF and UKF don't seem to pay for them in the first place.
Posts: 2742
Posts: 2066
That's a problem with the way factions were designed, look at how the Mobile Assault Regiment is the most used Brit commander, as it gives you all you will ever need.
AT least USA can't get a premium medium heavy tanks, with rocket artillery and flamers in a single package.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Yeah thank fuck for that! Hmm I don't think so. Ostheer and OKW were both designed with the Katyusha and B4 in mind, whilst OKW was also designed with the Priest in mind. Now that we have CalliOP dlc and the Land mattress DLC, relic simply overruled their own design for getting more cash from the community via overpowered doctrines that have no ties to any well though through proces of creation.
Posts: 414
Rocket artillery?
USSR: Non-doctrinal
UKF: Doctrinal
USF: Doctrinal
OKW: Non-doctrinal
Wher: Non-doctrinal
Just an observation.
1 
Posts: 453
Posts: 2066
Axis isn't fun to use anymore, not because they suck but the Allies are that much better.
Posts: 1072
You mean that Tank Destroyers can kill tanks!? AMAZING!!!
This sounds like Allies are building a well rounded "combined arms" force that can take on just about anything, isn't this like, what the game is supposed to be about?
Comets are really strong though, I'll admit that but, I think they are pricey enough to be justified, whining and overnerfing the Churchill, is what caused this.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
So combined arms for you means 2-3 units? Jacksons, rifles and maybe mortars/Calliope? Infantry tanks and artillery?
 |
|
|
64 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
123 | ||
 |
|
|
104 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
6 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
