In an attempt to get away from the HTD commander, I've been trying some of the others to mix it up. My problem, though, is that conscripts are worthless as actual infantry in the mid to late game. HTD gives them great survivability (probably too great), while the weapon upgrade gives them pretty good dps. Unfortunately, aside from picking that one commander, you don't get either of those options. Molotovs are near useless against decent players, which basically leaves conscripts as a "throw AT grenades at vehicles" platform. All while attempting to not die instantly to massed PGs and Grenadiers with LMGs.
So my balance suggestion is to move the weapon upgrade from a doctrinal ability to a global one. Make it require Vet 1 or building the T3/T4 building (either, not limited to just one). Increase the munition cost, maybe to 40. Then rebalance the HTD commander and throw another ability in there (with a HTD nerf because right now it's just too good against most players).
This would allow conscripts to have some AI value in the late game and give us incentive to pick something besides the "no brainer" commander that gives us HTD, better weapons, arty, and guards.
Conscript weapon upgrade
22 Jul 2013, 14:29 PM
#1

Posts: 101
23 Jul 2013, 06:01 AM
#2

Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedInteresting point about Cons firepower viability lategame in comparison to Grens with LMGs.
I think a better way to address this though, rather than a global PPSH upgrade which would (perhaps unduly) encourage Con spam, is by doing something about Penals.
I think a better way to address this though, rather than a global PPSH upgrade which would (perhaps unduly) encourage Con spam, is by doing something about Penals.
23 Jul 2013, 06:10 AM
#3

Posts: 2779
They are not worthless, they are only worthless while their commanders are worthless idiots 

23 Jul 2013, 06:17 AM
#4

Posts: 148
I haven't picked a different Soviet doctrine for the past few weeks. Global upgrade would be sweet, but it should be 60 munitions, IMO.
Also, you have to also take inconsideration that cons are tier zero units. I don't think you should be able to expect them to go into late game.
Right now, HTD is insane when you think about. A 240 man power, tier 0 unit can 1v1 and win against pgrans, assuming they're not naded.
Also, you have to also take inconsideration that cons are tier zero units. I don't think you should be able to expect them to go into late game.
Right now, HTD is insane when you think about. A 240 man power, tier 0 unit can 1v1 and win against pgrans, assuming they're not naded.
23 Jul 2013, 06:26 AM
#5

Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedCan I get a second on Penals needing attention?
23 Jul 2013, 07:27 AM
#6

Posts: 76
Can I get a second on Penals needing attention?
On a rare occasion I agree with Nullist, Soviet "Superior Infantry" (Penals) is anything but superior. The only viable late game soviet infantry is doctrinal and is a choice between guards or shocks.
23 Jul 2013, 13:05 PM
#7

Posts: 627
Penals are great, they're just horribly overshadowed by how cost efficient Conscripts are. They put out nearly the same damage as PzGrens with more models and more abilities(They still do have the fire-on-the-move accuracy penalty, unlike PzGrens). They're just much more focused on handling infantry, which is probably why they're not used so much. They have no soft-AV which means that there's no point spamming them when the German is bringing out tanks.
23 Jul 2013, 13:19 PM
#8

Posts: 101
They are not worthless, they are only worthless while their commanders are worthless idiots
Ok, so maybe "worthless" was too strong of a word. They certainly have their value. It also depends on the mode... I play 1v1 and 2v2, and conscripts are definitely more valuable into the late game in 1v1. But still, every other weapon upgrade is global (that I know of), so why is the conscript one doctrinal?
I don't really think that it would encourage conscript spam any more than we have now, since conscripts will still have their weaknesses... it just gives them a little boost in value at a muni cost. Once they nerf HTD, conscripts will be even less valuable than they are now.
But I'm fine with buffing penals instead, as Nullist suggested. Basically here's the situation I want to avoid... where German infantry is only counterable with doctrinal units. It takes me back to the old CoH: OF days where riflemen couldn't stand against the hordes of G43 wielding PG blobs, and it took Rangers to come in as a call in to pick up the slack against standard infantry. That's retarded. I don't want to see it happen here.
23 Jul 2013, 13:59 PM
#9

Posts: 194
To be honest I'm not sure why they dropped the pragma of "rifle good up close, gren good at range" that worked so well. Especially with true sight, conscripts really could shine if their base close range effectiveness was increased and they became potent flankers. Oorah might need to be slightly tweaked, maybe moved to vet1 or something.
I was pretty sad when it was confirmed that grens and cons were identically balanced.
I was pretty sad when it was confirmed that grens and cons were identically balanced.

23 Jul 2013, 14:28 PM
#10

Posts: 28
that grens and cons were identically balanced.
Actually Gren have a higher dps than conscript at close range.
PAGES (1)

1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
SHOUT IT OUT!



Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
Last Wednesday, 17:00 PM
Last Wednesday, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
Last Wednesday, 16:58 PM
Last Wednesday, 16:58 PM
SupremeStefan: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3457737797
04 Apr 2025, 12:42 PM
04 Apr 2025, 12:42 PM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus 
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM

02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" 
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM

01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy 
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM

27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific.
.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM

24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
11 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
13 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43163.872+9
- 2.59482.879+8
- 3.14839.791+7
- 4.13344.751+7
- 5.286162.638+4
- 6.18151.780+4
- 7.313114.733+9
- 8.378255.597+4
- 9.14265.686+10
- 10.17773.708+3
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger

Einhoven Country

Honor it
14

Download
1364
Board Info
367 users are online:
367 guests
0 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
54 posts in the last month
4 posts in the last week
54 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53559
Welcome our newest member, s666vegas
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, s666vegas
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM