Login

russian armor

Too much time waiting. [TEAM GAMES]

19 Jun 2016, 14:47 PM
#1
avatar of Gdot

Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1

I think the program works well for 1v1 where this algorithm finds more success but waiting for high level opponents in team games almost never happens. I find myself waiting almost 10 minutes to play a game and then we get matched up against low level players anyway. The game loses its draw when you spend more time waiting for a game than actual time spent in a game. BRING BACK REASONABLE QUEUE TIMES.
19 Jun 2016, 15:34 PM
#2
avatar of Just easy

Posts: 110

No. Matching high ranking teams vs med/low ranking randoms should never happen, especially not quickly. It's a complete waste of time for everyone involved. At least with the way it is now everyone except the highest ranking players usually get decent games in decent time.
19 Jun 2016, 15:38 PM
#3
avatar of dizzi98

Posts: 4

just find 3 other people to play with you and search together its usually quicker
19 Jun 2016, 17:01 PM
#4
avatar of Gdot

Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1

No. Matching high ranking teams vs med/low ranking randoms should never happen, especially not quickly. It's a complete waste of time for everyone involved. At least with the way it is now everyone except the highest ranking players usually get decent games in decent time.


You know whats also a waste of time? Waiting 10 minutes to avoid a crappy match-up just to get a crappy match-up. I understand the theory, but it doesn't work for team games. Player pool is too small in team games for this to work effectively.
19 Jun 2016, 17:27 PM
#5
avatar of Just easy

Posts: 110

Like I said it usually works fine for anyone but the highest ranking players. If you want a quicker game, play random or with different players.
19 Jun 2016, 17:27 PM
#6
avatar of Just easy

Posts: 110

and I'm not sure why you would even want to keep playing with teams if you're always getting crappy match ups.
19 Jun 2016, 17:30 PM
#7
avatar of über alles

Posts: 85

Just no, It's ok like that, better wait 5 more min to find decent enemy than matching with pro and noob together for a broken non fun match
19 Jun 2016, 17:51 PM
#8
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Jun 2016, 14:47 PMGdot
I think the program works well for 1v1 where this algorithm finds more success but waiting for high level opponents in team games almost never happens. I find myself waiting almost 10 minutes to play a game and then we get matched up against low level players anyway. The game loses its draw when you spend more time waiting for a game than actual time spent in a game. BRING BACK REASONABLE QUEUE TIMES.

I do more custom games with higher teams (edit i did, i dont play much atm) bcs the waiting time is soooo long. But i dont want to play against noobs as well. I dont know if there is a solution :*(
19 Jun 2016, 18:04 PM
#9
avatar of Shanka

Posts: 323

The problem of high ranked premade :snfPeter:

I just play solo random if i want to quickly play

Too few player to fill higher rank skill playerbase :(
19 Jun 2016, 18:56 PM
#10
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

and I'm not sure why you would even want to keep playing with teams if you're always getting crappy match ups.

With crappy match ups he means, i always win. And thats not fun.
19 Jun 2016, 18:56 PM
#11
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Jun 2016, 15:38 PMdizzi98
just find 3 other people to play with you and search together its usually quicker

Its the same if you play with 2/3 other people... :(
20 Jun 2016, 02:42 AM
#12
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

i've been random 3v3ing. i know 3v3 is the least popular mode but the wait times are always 5min+ long 90% of the time.


and as allies, it is quite balanced because no coordination allies = headless chicken. so even after 10 minute (yes, it does happen sometimes), i still get a match that is supposedly a steamroll that is a hard fucking match. SO.... why did i have to wait 10 minute for an even match? i dunno... coordination is the biggest part in balance in 3v3+ and the matchmaking doesn't seem to take that into account.
20 Jun 2016, 06:38 AM
#13
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

Randoms are better with it, and i bet relic dont care about ATs.
20 Jun 2016, 06:56 AM
#14
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Jun 2016, 18:04 PMShanka
The problem of high ranked premade :snfPeter:

I just play solo random if i want to quickly play

Too few player to fill higher rank skill playerbase :(


You're lucky, I tried a 1vs1 Sunday afternoon and waited 5/7 minutes to finally meet someone ranking+600 than me, I waited more than I played against him (I didn't cheese neither did something particularly OP during the game). The game didn't last enough to give us points.
20 Jun 2016, 21:06 PM
#15
avatar of GhostTX

Posts: 315

Sounds like you should take the time to get something productive done while you wait. Good book? Some weights? Fold/hang up clothes...
20 Jun 2016, 21:28 PM
#16
21 Jun 2016, 17:07 PM
#17
avatar of Mittens
Donator 11

Posts: 1276

It should get better after todays patch but outside of that its a matter of how many people are searching at the time. The best thing they could do in the future is assign an ELO rating by individual and match from there.
22 Jun 2016, 14:14 PM
#18
avatar of Gdot

Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 17:07 PMMittens
It should get better after todays patch but outside of that its a matter of how many people are searching at the time. The best thing they could do in the future is assign an ELO rating by individual and match from there.


Or they could cut the waiting time which is pushing players away from the game because it takes too long. Hey guys want to play? "nah we just spend all our time waiting anyway".
22 Jun 2016, 15:26 PM
#19
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

You will need to wait another patch right now is like 80% ally 20% axis maybe next time with no bug and sane nerf and buff ( not like now)
22 Jun 2016, 18:01 PM
#20
avatar of pugzii

Posts: 513

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Jun 2016, 14:47 PMGdot
I think the program works well for 1v1 where this algorithm finds more success but waiting for high level opponents in team games almost never happens. I find myself waiting almost 10 minutes to play a game and then we get matched up against low level players anyway. The game loses its draw when you spend more time waiting for a game than actual time spent in a game. BRING BACK REASONABLE QUEUE TIMES.


nah dude
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

Brazil 16
United Kingdom 205
Norway 34
United States 23
unknown 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

903 users are online: 2 members and 901 guests
aerafield, debethiphop
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49083
Welcome our newest member, debethiphop
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM