Skins - winter in summer
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 30
Posts: 525
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
But Butt...wut about british and hamericanski on Semoisky or Kholodnie Ferma or russky in France?
Most of the maps are fine as there is nothing to say 'this is definitely Russia' or 'or this is France, not Eastern Germany/Prussia or Poland' aside from the occasional orthodox church. However, if I had my way, the British and Americans wouldn't fight alongside the Russians, but I'm probably a minority.
But, this thread is not about eastern front units fighting in the west or vise versa, so please try to stay on topic.
Posts: 721
I assume the eight people voting "no" meant it should not be a choice, it should be sorted automatically by the game.
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
You guys must be from places where the seasons and climate are fairly binary. I just like to envision their use during the early spring or late fall, a flash thaw or freak snow storm briefly outmoded the camouflage. Or my crews are being lazy and haven't repainted yet.
It's tough to call it an early thaw if there are leaves on the trees and grass is growing. Also, keep in mind this game takes place in temperate Europe where seasons are binary.
Again, I'm fine with summer camos in winter as it still makes sense (especially since a lot of the allies didn't camo their vehicles anyway).
I don't think the crews would be lazy. It's their lives. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be caught in a white tank when there is no snow on the ground.
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
How come this is even an issue, as in: why is there even two setups of skins in the box if it's not intended to make this difference? Of course we shouldn't see winterskins in summer, wth! That it can happen must be considered a bug, not a feature.
I assume the eight people voting "no" meant it should not be a choice, it should be sorted automatically by the game.
I'm actually shocked that anyone has voted against this option. It's not like it would affect the people who wanted to use white tanks in the summer - they just don't have to turn the option off.
Posts: 97
Especially since the new Valkyria Chronicles unrealistic skins are out.( they're still beautiful though )
And i agree that winter Camo ( especially full white skins ) are a bit disturbing on summer maps.
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
I'm ok for an option like " Disable other people's skins ".
Especially since the new Valkyria Chronicles unrealistic skins are out.( they're still beautiful though )
And i agree that winter Camo ( especially full white skins ) are a bit disturbing on summer maps.
They have that already, an option to disable unhistorical skins and that includes the valkyria stuff, thankfully. Although, I'm pretty sure most of the OKW and US skins aren't real (I haven't seen a photo of them). For OKW, I think that only the Rotbraun ambush and the ardennes camo are real camouflages that they used and for US I think they're all not real except the new operation husky one.
Posts: 97
Otherwise for the OKW skins, they are all historical except the Panzergrau West pattern ( I'm not sure it is, but maybe )
For US i know that the Field Camouflage/Four Color Camouflage/Ardennes Field-Modified Camouflage/Baker, Dog and Fox Company Camouflages existed and were used in Europe/Afrika ( For the Dog ) and Italy ( For the Four Color at least ). Don't know for the others.
PS : The Field Camouflages can not be historically accurate because ... they were Field Camouflages lol. Most of the crews painted their own tank how they could. They were all unique.
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
Oh we already have ? Didn't notice.
Otherwise for the OKW skins, they are all historical except the Panzergrau West pattern ( I'm not sure it is, but maybe )
For US i know that the Field Camouflage/Four Color Camouflage/Ardennes Field-Modified Camouflage/Baker, Dog and Fox Company Camouflages existed and were used in Europe/Afrika ( For the Dog ) and Italy ( For the Four Color at least ). Don't know for the others.
PS : The Field Camouflages can not be historically accurate because ... they were Field Camouflages lol. Most of the crews painted their own tank how they could. They were all unique.
Could you find photos of the OKW ones? I haven't been able to and that's why i think they're not historical.
For the US ones, the only one I've seen a photo is of the four color one - but in the photo there are only 2 colors. I forgot about the other reward US camos.
Sorry, I don't agree with the last point. I think they can be historically accurate because units tended to paint their vehicles the same way and if there's a photo of it, then it existed.
Posts: 97
What i meant in the P.S was that the USF didn't have standardized camouflages on its vehicles in ww2. Most of the tanks were built and send on the front withtout being paint ( They were juste in standard Olive Drab ) in factories, unlike many German tanks who were paint directly after the production.
So yeah, many US tanks had the same pattern ( following their unit and theater of operations of course, they didn't paint a sand pattern in Ardennes lol ) but the crew itself decided how to paint their own tank, like all field-camouflages.
Posts: 2885
Most of the maps are fine as there is nothing to say 'this is definitely Russia' or 'or this is France, not Eastern Germany/Prussia or Poland' aside from the occasional orthodox church. However, if I had my way, the British and Americans wouldn't fight alongside the Russians, but I'm probably a minority.
But, this thread is not about eastern front units fighting in the west or vise versa, so please try to stay on topic.
There are many more inconsitencies than that. For example osheer soldiers always refer to their opponents as 'soviet pigs' or 'communists' even if these are wearing american uniforms. Same goes for OKW soldiers, they think everybody is either american or german. I doubt we will ever get rid of such immersion killers.
Posts: 97
Anyway for the others, i found a bunch of screens :
Rotbraun Ambush Pattern : http://puu.sh/p73oY/1db4ceee7f.jpg / http://puu.sh/p73yD/5acaeda690.jpg / http://puu.sh/p73H0/60ef3c39cb.jpg ( only on the Schürzen for this one )
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/Panzer-V_Panther.php ( Here's some information on these camouflages. )
Two-Tone Field Pattern : http://puu.sh/p748j/f6aadb96cf.jpg
Didn't find an Ardennes Forest Pattern though, but i'm pretty sure it existed.
Posts: 559
Could you find photos of the OKW ones? I haven't been able to and that's why i think they're not historical.
The Original Ardennes Forrest Pattern:
Germany January 6th 1945, a german Panther tank is passing anti-tank obstacles of the Westwall near Weissenburg/Bergzabern
Sorry, I don't agree with the last point. I think they can be historically accurate because units tended to paint their vehicles the same way and if there's a photo of it, then it existed.
Evidence i. e. Striped Camouflage:
Germany February/March 1945, Unit of Panther Ausf. G at Ortwig near Küstrin.
in Combat:
Posts: 97
Posts: 559
Hmpf, the Ardennes Pattern was, indeed, just under my eyes. Better open them next time
No problem, buddy.
Livestreams
1 | |||||
951 | |||||
9 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
10 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Esco76747
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM