I dont think the main gun needs a buff. The armor of the Churchill should come up and its health should come down. Swapping those around keeps the churchill from feeding LOADS of vet as it does now, while still being the support tank for fireflys. Another issue that is being addressed (but isnt touch the armor/hp issue) is the cost. In the current meta, the churchill is simply to expensive for how it preforms and for how long it takes to repair.
As such the tank should take less of a meatshield role and more of a "shoot at this cuz it can sometimes do damage and is good vs infantry" with all of its armor. It would promote flanking the slow tank and could be easy to flank and have low rear armor to combo it.
Churchill is garbage
23 May 2016, 18:22 PM
#41
1 
Posts: 1276
23 May 2016, 18:27 PM
#42
Posts: 118
The kv1 is a lot worst, it can only wish to be as rubbish as the churchill.
23 May 2016, 18:36 PM
#43
1 Posts: 1276
The kv1 is a lot worst, it can only wish to be as rubbish as the churchill.
That whole commander is rubbish after the triple nerfs it got.
23 May 2016, 18:52 PM
#44
Posts: 118
That whole commander is rubbish after the triple nerfs it got.
1 oct. 2013
Featuring:
An artillery piece able to shoot far outside his aiming reticle, includes bugged animations able to maneuver to incredible slow speeds!
A tank able to be worse than a cheap useless t34!
And one meh ability supposed to inspire all your units to fight harder! (but in silence, nobody is allowed to scream or make an urrah)
Buy it today!
soviets 3,99€ only soviets
23 May 2016, 20:14 PM
#45
Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3
Make it a Churchill Kangaroo guys. Then make it so you can reinforce out of it. Ultimate cheese.
23 May 2016, 23:18 PM
#46
Posts: 1930
Well 320 armor and 1280 hp not doctrinal for only 180 fuel would be spammed like no tomorrow (and in biased right ?)
really, there's one golden rule in this case: can the panther beat the churchill 1v1.
the panther should still be able to kill the churchill on a 1v1 basis, but it should take a long time.
23 May 2016, 23:50 PM
#47
Posts: 738
Vanilla churchill is just too slow to be of use, even with the cost reduction its still 490mp 160f for a slower bulky cromwell that can't scratch or chase axis tanks (add another 50 fuel to that for unlock).
Yes you have enough HP to drive forward and nibble a few volk models and throw a grenade, then you reach a Jagdpanzer/Command panther and you lose it trying to reverse with the god aweful speed and useless smoke.
However the AVRE and the Croc are actually useful as you can warspeed away after wiping weapons teams, then you have Comets/fireflies backing them up with fog of war tracking.
Churchill is just a meme tank, anvil is a meme choice until heavy sappers lose the speed debuff and royal arty actually becomes relevant.
Yes you have enough HP to drive forward and nibble a few volk models and throw a grenade, then you reach a Jagdpanzer/Command panther and you lose it trying to reverse with the god aweful speed and useless smoke.
However the AVRE and the Croc are actually useful as you can warspeed away after wiping weapons teams, then you have Comets/fireflies backing them up with fog of war tracking.
Churchill is just a meme tank, anvil is a meme choice until heavy sappers lose the speed debuff and royal arty actually becomes relevant.
24 May 2016, 07:24 AM
#48
Posts: 4474
I rember the video when the Churchill almost killed a tiger at close range 1 more shoot and it was dead
really, there's one golden rule in this case: can the panther beat the churchill 1v1.
the panther should still be able to kill the churchill on a 1v1 basis, but it should take a long time.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
24 May 2016, 08:03 AM
#49
Posts: 680
Lol,
The Churchill is so rubbish that someone has to bring up a time it almost won against something.
The Churchill is so rubbish that someone has to bring up a time it almost won against something.
24 May 2016, 08:10 AM
#50
Posts: 4474
Lol,well it can beat a every not heavy tank easily I was just pointing out that even if it cost less it could almost beat a tiger that cost 1/3 more
The Churchill is so rubbish that someone has to bring up a time it almost won against something.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
24 May 2016, 08:17 AM
#51
Posts: 680
It is meant to be a heavy tank yet has less armour than a light-medium with a single bulletin.
It is crap. Unused. A waste of space. Pointless. Inadequate. Useless. A waste of resources.
It is crap. Unused. A waste of space. Pointless. Inadequate. Useless. A waste of resources.
24 May 2016, 08:23 AM
#52
Posts: 4474
It is meant to be a heavy tank yet has less armour than a light-medium with a single bulletin.
It is crap. Unused. A waste of space. Pointless. Inadequate. Useless. A waste of resources.
Hey smart ass if you would fucking look at my reply you would see that we were talking about the Churchill with 320 armor 1280 hp dat costs 160-180 fuel non doctrinal and not capped to 1, do you understand the implications ?
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
24 May 2016, 08:27 AM
#53
Posts: 175
Hey smart ass if you would fucking look at my reply you would see that we were talking about the Churchill with 320 armor 1280 hp dat costs 160-180 fuel non doctrinal and not capped to 1, do you understand the implications ?
How would you make the churchill viable?
24 May 2016, 08:29 AM
#54
Posts: 4474
240 armor 180 rear 1400 hp 160 fuel 490 mp if you want to spam rember the gun can still do this
How would you make the churchill viable?
or 320 armor 180 rear 1280 hp 180 fuel 560mp capped at 1 on the field
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
24 May 2016, 08:40 AM
#55
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I rember the video when the Churchill almost killed a tiger at close range 1 more shoot and it was dead
Too bad you don't remember it had 1600hp and 280 armor back then while Tiger had less pen.
And yeah, that is a 100% valid vid there, this is EXACTLY how we use tanks in game, we never use 45 range units at 45 range, because it makes no sense, we always use them at range of 2.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
24 May 2016, 08:43 AM
#56
Posts: 4474
well 320 1280 would be the same result and I said close range and by your logic the su , Jackson, and firefly are opop and for 1 time instead of pointing out every little thing the others says how about you give your opinion on my suggestion or make your own ?
Too bad you don't remember it had 1600hp and 280 armor back then while Tiger had less pen.
And yeah, that is a 100% valid vid there, this is EXACTLY how we use tanks in game.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
24 May 2016, 08:57 AM
#57
Posts: 33
well 320 1280 would be the same result and I said close range and by your logic the su , Jackson, and firefly are opop and for 1 time instead of pointing out every little thing the others says how about you give your opinion on my suggestion or make your own ?
Idiotic usage of a tiger tanks is not a good argument
24 May 2016, 08:58 AM
#58
Posts: 4474
i was pointing out the potency of the gun
Idiotic usage of a tiger tanks is not a good argument
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
24 May 2016, 09:01 AM
#59
Posts: 33
Yeah. The potency drops with range.
24 May 2016, 09:02 AM
#60
Posts: 4474
Yeah. The potency drops with range.still quite potent for an anti infantry tank
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
66 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
295 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
730 users are online:
730 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49122
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM