Posts: 255
Stugs are not proving effective enough vs SU85s, imo.
Conscripts are not proving effecting enough vs Ostwinds.
FIX IT RELIC!@!~!!!!
Posts: 255
Posts: 255
Well considering how slowly conscripts kill other infantry i see his point but do not condone the saracasm
Posts: 2425
Permanently Banned
Posts: 119
Whats the SU85 scatter value?
"angle_scatter": 7.5,
"distance_scatter_max": 10,
"angle_scatter": 7.5,
"distance_scatter_max": 6.5,
"angle_scatter": 7.5,
"distance_scatter_max": 10,
"angle_scatter": 5,
"distance_scatter_max": 7.5,
"angle_scatter": 5.5,
"distance_scatter_max": 10,
"angle_scatter": 7.5,
"distance_scatter_max": 10,
Posts: 255
Posts: 79
Posts: 99
Posts: 299
Played 2v2 on Pripyat winter yesterday, we held both fuelpoints and 2 VPs a decent amount of time and had a total of like 5 P4 early. They still managed to fuck us with like 2 Su85. Ridiculous match. I even placed a Pak43, but of course it was instantly destroyed by airstrike (didn't place it well anyway, did't get a good shot).
 | Playercard of RtN.Con | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 79
Posts: 978
Posts: 531
In the original COH there was a unit that outranged all the tanks and was still balanced. It was the PE´s Marder III. You know why it was balanced? To outrange other tanks it had to deploy. Thus it could actually be flanked. Maybe this is a solution for the Su-85. It could get it´s sight and range increase only when deployed.
Posts: 97
In the original COH there was a unit that outranged all the tanks and was still balanced. It was the PE´s Marder III. You know why it was balanced? To outrange other tanks it had to deploy. Thus it could actually be flanked. Maybe this is a solution for the Su-85. It could get it´s sight and range increase only when deployed.
Posts: 665
Yeah it was sluggish (awful turning) and fragile, but fast. I think the SU85 should be similar in feel.
Posts: 642
Posts: 8
Posts: 119
The main problem with the SU-85 is the skill it takes to use and support. Because the SU-85 can engage german tanks without risking return fire, supporting the SU-85 vs german armor simply requires having a conscript squad nearby with an AT grenade or guards with button, since german tanks HAVE to close with the SU-85. The real problem is the Axis' lack of a non-doctrinal, mobile unit that can fire back at the SU at its maximum range.
The answer here should be the StuG, but it's not. I think if the PanzerWerfer were moved down to Tier 3 and the StuG moved up to Tier 4 and given a range buff so that it can engage the SU at its maximum range, you'd see more mixed armor tactics from the soviets and less SU85 spam.
Posts: 642
Posts: 255
The main problem with the SU-85 is the skill it takes to use and support. Because the SU-85 can engage german tanks without risking return fire, supporting the SU-85 vs german armor simply requires having a conscript squad nearby with an AT grenade or guards with button, since german tanks HAVE to close with the SU-85. The real problem is the Axis' lack of a non-doctrinal, mobile unit that can fire back at the SU at its maximum range.
The answer here should be the StuG, but it's not. I think if the PanzerWerfer were moved down to Tier 3 and the StuG moved up to Tier 4 and given a range buff so that it can engage the SU at its maximum range, you'd see more mixed armor tactics from the soviets and less SU85 spam.
Posts: 168
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
105 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
