For such a cheap cost it can destroy :
SU76 which costs 75 Fuel
M5 which costs 30 Fuel
M20 which costs 20 Fuel
Greyhound which costs 40 Fuel
AAHT which costs 50 Fuel
M3 which costs the same, fuel wise
Jeep which costs 20
Katy which costs 85 Fuel
It can go on.
It should be changed into a decent AI vehicle with half the current penetration. Or increase the cost to 50 fuel. The current AOE and ROF isn't bad against inf anyhow, it causes massive MP bleed and it takes 3 nades to go down.
When will relic address the 210MP/15Fuel Tank destroyer
27 Apr 2016, 03:31 AM
#1
Posts: 182
Permanently Banned
usf
ostheer
27 Apr 2016, 03:33 AM
#2
Posts: 18
How do you lose an SU-76 to a 222?!?!?
Unless you're sleeping during the match there is no way that is possible....
Unless you're sleeping during the match there is no way that is possible....
27 Apr 2016, 03:45 AM
#3
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
How do you lose an SU-76 to a 222?!?!?
Unless you're sleeping during the match there is no way that is possible....
Oh, but it is...
Its called circle strafing, and approaching his rear when he is looking the other way.
27 Apr 2016, 03:48 AM
#4
Posts: 18
Oh, but it is...
Its called circle strafing, and approaching his rear when he is looking the other way.
Where is your SU-76 support?
27 Apr 2016, 03:50 AM
#5
Posts: 182
Permanently BannedWas the SU76 the only unit mentioned? Are you saying the cost/performance ratio for a unit which is supposed to be a light car justified?
A 222 is not unsupported either, and can smoke and flank or yolo rush since it costs nothing anyway.
A 222 is not unsupported either, and can smoke and flank or yolo rush since it costs nothing anyway.
usfostheer
27 Apr 2016, 03:52 AM
#6
Posts: 18
Not really sure about the 222 overall, I was just commenting on the ridiculous SU-76 example.
27 Apr 2016, 03:58 AM
#7
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Was the SU76 the only unit mentioned? Are you saying the cost/performance ratio for a unit which is supposed to be a light car justified?
It is justified mate.
I've had lost Panzer IV's to SU76, simply because it could outrange me, and it has ridiculous penetration for the price
A 222 is not unsupported either, and can smoke and flank or yolo rush since it costs nothing anyway.
Wanna know how I know you're SU/Allies exclusive?
Every 222 you waste pushes backk the Panther
Not really sure about the 222 overall, I was just commenting on the ridiculous SU-76 example.
Lul, nice one - I fell for it
27 Apr 2016, 04:03 AM
#8
Posts: 467
For such a cheap cost it can destroy :
Katy which costs 85 Fuel
What is this supposed to mean? A Kubelwagen can too
Terrible post L2P
27 Apr 2016, 04:15 AM
#9
Posts: 182
Permanently BannedIs this how you L2P?
Terrible post L2P
https://www.coh2.org/topic/52183/bofor-barrage
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51745/british-faction-broken
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51554/calliope-op
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51550/brit-combined-arms
https://www.coh2.org/topic/26428/why-does-the-m20-mine-need-to-one-shot-the-puma
usfostheer
27 Apr 2016, 04:16 AM
#10
Posts: 375
Your telling us u had no cons with at nades near by or a zis gun out at this point.
AU Straya! Credit to Jaskass4life for image vv
27 Apr 2016, 04:17 AM
#11
Posts: 467
Is this how you L2P?
https://www.coh2.org/topic/52183/bofor-barrage
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51745/british-faction-broken
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51554/calliope-op
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51550/brit-combined-arms
https://www.coh2.org/topic/26428/why-does-the-m20-mine-need-to-one-shot-the-puma
Great reply, won't be too long until you are banned again
27 Apr 2016, 04:21 AM
#12
Posts: 182
Permanently BannedYour telling us u had no cons with at nades near by or a zis gun out at this point.I am telling Kpen97 the 222 is too cheap. Get a private interpreter if you have to.
usfostheer
27 Apr 2016, 04:31 AM
#13
Posts: 609
It definitely needs a minor cost increase, but 50 fuel is lulzworthy. I'd peg it at 240/20.
Also, your argument is utter nonsense. You should have been comparing its stats to its analogues, the M20 and the Greyhound, not arbitrarily claiming its OP because it kills units with higher fuel values
Also, your argument is utter nonsense. You should have been comparing its stats to its analogues, the M20 and the Greyhound, not arbitrarily claiming its OP because it kills units with higher fuel values
27 Apr 2016, 04:33 AM
#14
Posts: 182
Permanently BannedThat is one way to look at it, although a dumb one.
Also, your argument is utter nonsense. You should have been comparing its stats to its analogues, the M20 and the Greyhound, not arbitrarily claiming its OP because it kills units with higher fuel values
usfostheer
27 Apr 2016, 04:35 AM
#15
Posts: 609
That is one way to look at it, although a dumb one.
Not really. What you're doing at the moment takes everything out of context. It would be the same as claiming Grens are OP because they beat a ZiS gun for less MP.
27 Apr 2016, 04:36 AM
#16
Posts: 182
Permanently BannedThat is an utterly irrelevant example. You can just yolo rush with a 222 and detroy expensive vehicle, you can't do taht with m20 or similar stuff.
Because they are supposed to be light cars, not tank destroyers.
Because they are supposed to be light cars, not tank destroyers.
usfostheer
27 Apr 2016, 04:53 AM
#17
Posts: 2742
Well they aren't, since the SU-76 isn't a tank.
A t70 isn't as fearful of a 222.
An Elefant can be soloed by a t34/76 in the same fashion. Hell, a t34/76 can even solo a King Tiger if it's got a damaged engine and enough room to maneuver.
***edit
I'll add though, that I really do think that the 222 might work better if it got its upgun upgrade again considering the health increase it got, and especially so if they fix its bugged out mg.
A t70 isn't as fearful of a 222.
An Elefant can be soloed by a t34/76 in the same fashion. Hell, a t34/76 can even solo a King Tiger if it's got a damaged engine and enough room to maneuver.
***edit
I'll add though, that I really do think that the 222 might work better if it got its upgun upgrade again considering the health increase it got, and especially so if they fix its bugged out mg.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
27 Apr 2016, 05:27 AM
#18
Posts: 1124
OP needs to get banned. Losing a su76 to a 222. Lol.
27 Apr 2016, 05:33 AM
#19
Posts: 255
His approach is a mess but the fact still stands that the 222 is way too cost efficient.
If it can easily take out a 340/20 unit (M20) then it needs to cost something like 280/25.
Not to mention with vet and spotting scopes it can damn near scout the whole map.
If it can easily take out a 340/20 unit (M20) then it needs to cost something like 280/25.
Not to mention with vet and spotting scopes it can damn near scout the whole map.
27 Apr 2016, 05:37 AM
#20
Posts: 174
I'm more peeved about how it shits on the soviet scout car despite the similar cost.
That thing is beyond useless.
That thing is beyond useless.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
205 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231