Login

russian armor

Upcoming Patch Buffs & Nerfs

21 Apr 2016, 12:08 PM
#1
avatar of Hitman5

Posts: 467

What are you hoping for? This is my list:

Nerf All LMGs

Wehr
Buffs:
Panther (Anti-Infantry damage)
Brummbar (Accuracy)

Nerfs:
222 (Damage)

SU
Buffs:
B-4 (Accuracy)
KV1 (Damage)
Penal Battalion (Damage)
T-34/76 (Damage)

Nerfs:
None

OKW
Buffs:
Panther (Anti-Infantry damage)
251 Flak HT (Setup time & Suppression)
Flammpanzer Hetzer (Damage & Vet)
MG34 (Suppression)

Nerfs:
Jagdtiger (Accuracy)

USF
Buffs:
M20 (Damage)
M8 (Damage)
WC51 (Cost)
M1 AT Gun (Penetration)

Nerfs:
Riflemen Vet 3 (Received accuracy)
Motor Carriage (Accuracy)
Pack Howitzer (Accuracy)
Calliope (AOE and damage)

UKF
Buffs:
Valentine (CP)

Nerfs:
Cromwell (Cost)
UKF Counter Barrage (Range and Accuracy)
Brace Emplacement (Cost)
Mortar Emplacement (HP)
Bofor Emplacement (HP)
Vickers MG (Range)
Comet (Cost and Anti-Infantry damage)
AEC (Damage and treadbreaker time: 5-10 seconds instead of 20-25+)
Land mattress (AOE and damage)
21 Apr 2016, 12:16 PM
#2
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

Panther doesn't need anti inf buf it is needed nerf.

Panther is Tank destroyer in the game

Remove Top Gunner upgrade.
21 Apr 2016, 12:30 PM
#3
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

Panther doesn't need anti inf buf it is needed nerf.

Panther is Tank destroyer in the game

Remove Top Gunner upgrade.
Ostheer T3 > Ostheer T4. Panther is pretty underwhelming in most of the games. Nothing double Panzer IVs or StuGs can´t handle. If you want to nerf Ostheer T4 out of the game then and only then your suggestion to nerf the Panther is viable. If the AI gets nerfed as you suggest the Panther should get 60 range though.

The Panther becomes actually good at vet2. But getting it there is hard as you hardly kill any infantry (at least with the Ostheer version which is a bit weaker in AI iirc) or can only take single shots and drive off due to the low health pool. A small buff to AI would actually make the Panther way more viable.
21 Apr 2016, 12:34 PM
#4
avatar of Domine

Posts: 500

The Panther will not get any anti-inf buffs and it's not supposed to. It won't get nerfed either, but the problem with Ost is with T4 cost.


OP's list seems not really well thought through.
21 Apr 2016, 12:36 PM
#5
avatar of Shanka

Posts: 323

Yay let's nerf USF only 2 non doc indirect fire units :snfPeter:
21 Apr 2016, 12:36 PM
#6
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

there is so much "why dude why" in this list

like nerf m8 scotts accuracy

dude thats like on of the most useless units right now
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 PM
#7
avatar of Waegukin

Posts: 609

Lol, nerf scotts? The only time I've seen one was when the AI built it.
21 Apr 2016, 12:54 PM
#8
avatar of Hitman5

Posts: 467

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Apr 2016, 12:30 PMButcher
Ostheer T3 > Ostheer T4. Panther is pretty underwhelming in most of the games. Nothing double Panzer IVs or StuGs can´t handle. If you want to nerf Ostheer T4 out of the game then and only then your suggestion to nerf the Panther is viable. If the AI gets nerfed as you suggest the Panther should get 60 range though.


Exactly


jump backJump back to quoted post21 Apr 2016, 12:36 PMShanka
Yay let's nerf USF only 2 non doc indirect fire units :snfPeter:


They are both over performing so I don't see the problem

there is so much "why dude why" in this list

like nerf m8 scotts accuracy

dude thats like on of the most useless units right now

Lol, nerf scotts? The only time I've seen one was when the AI built it.


Maybe try using them. They are over performing and way too accurate. On top they are really hard to counter when used properly so they definitely need a nerf.
21 Apr 2016, 13:01 PM
#9
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Apr 2016, 12:54 PMHitman5


Exactly




They are both over performing so I don't see the problem




Maybe try using them. They are over performing and way too accurate. On top they are really hard to counter when used properly so they definitely need a nerf.


maybe try to play the same game as i do
21 Apr 2016, 13:05 PM
#10
avatar of Shanka

Posts: 323



maybe try to play the same game as i do


*insert thank you gif here*
21 Apr 2016, 13:05 PM
#11
avatar of MissCommissar

Posts: 673

Someone forgot to add in "UKF buffs" poor Sextons. They are actually same bad, as Valentines.

And would be nice to buff Royal Artillery at all.
21 Apr 2016, 13:06 PM
#12
avatar of Hitman5

Posts: 467

Someone forgot to add in "UKF buffs" poor Sextons. They are actually same bad, as Valentines.

And would be nice to buff Royal Artillery at all.


Yes that does need a buff, I did forget. The base 25 pounder probably needs buff as well.
21 Apr 2016, 13:13 PM
#13
avatar of MissCommissar

Posts: 673

And I don't get, why Panther should have increased AI abilities? It's already good in that, having 3 or even 4 MGs on that. Panther is AT-tank with outstanding armor, fast speed and nice range of fire. Add AI effectiveness and you will get... Pershing with armor, lol.

Brummbar acuraccy should be rised right after buffing KV-2 and Dozer accuracy. Not before!

Nerfing riflemans? Ok, let's nerf infantry of faction, which is already have pretty poor and glassy tanks, no non-doctirnal mortars/rockets and latecoming HMGs. We already have crippled soviets without real core in their army, don't make USF lose their core in face of Riflemans, duuuude!

And if you gonna make emplacement's HP lesser, than makes MP cost lesser. I don't want to pay 400 MP for big, static and fragile mortars, for example.

21 Apr 2016, 13:23 PM
#14
avatar of Ful4n0

Posts: 345

isn´t the panther the TD with better AI capabilities in this game???? and then, why panther need AI buffed??? why not buffing Jackson, SU-85 and JP4 to panther AI capabilities level???

21 Apr 2016, 13:27 PM
#15
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Apr 2016, 13:23 PMFul4n0
isn´t the panther the TD with better AI capabilities in this game???? and then, why panther need AI buffed??? why not buffing Jackson, SU-85 and JP4 to panther AI capabilities level???

Because the Panther comes at 175f(Ost)/200f (OKW) respectively and has 10 range less than other dedicated AT units. For Ostheer in general it comes in an unattractive tier with very high teching cost. In a vacuum it is a good vehicle. But it is not "Skipping T3" or "Stopping to build further Panzer IVs" - good and thus rather unattractive.

I consider the Panzer IV superior, simply because it gets 20 infantry in no time and reaches vet2 easily. At that point the armor is high enough to bounce a shot every now and then and take on tanks on its own.
21 Apr 2016, 13:32 PM
#16
avatar of MissCommissar

Posts: 673

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Apr 2016, 13:27 PMButcher
Because the Panther comes at 175f(Ost)/200f (OKW) respectively and has 10 range less than other dedicated AT units. For Ostheer in general it comes in an unattractive tier with very high teching cost.


When you say "unattractive" you should mean T-34-76, not Panther. Cos everyone makes Panthers and almost noone T-34-76s, ok?

And that "10 range less" is price for 320 frontal armor, and nice speed. 10 less range and high price.

If you want Panther-type anti-everything tank you should play as USF and use Pershing, cos it's really copy of Panther with AI capabilities. Or call Tigers, they are badass too :romeoPro:
21 Apr 2016, 13:32 PM
#17
avatar of Ful4n0

Posts: 345

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Apr 2016, 13:27 PMButcher
Because the Panther comes at 175f(Ost)/200f (OKW) respectively and has 10 range less than other dedicated AT units. For Ostheer in general it comes in an unattractive tier with very high teching cost. In a vacuum it is a good vehicle. But it is not "Skipping T3" or "Stopping to build further Panzer IVs" - good and thus rather unattractive.

I consider the Panzer IV superior, simply because it gets 20 infantry in no time and reaches vet2 easily. At that point the armor is high enough to bounce a shot every now and then and take on tanks on its own.


panther has some cons and some pros.....has better armor than most of the other tank destroyers, it has a turret and it has better AI capabilities than others....Then, you can even improve with blitz and smoke....

if t4 is not OK, fix T4, not fine units inside that tier imho, but I´m a noob so who cares what I think.

thanks for you reply....don´t aggree with your reasoning but appreciatted anyway.

Thanks.
21 Apr 2016, 13:42 PM
#18
avatar of mycalliope

Posts: 721

i would add sexton buff
and lol at panther buff and scoot nerf
rest seems fine..although i wouldn't mind falls and obers buff
21 Apr 2016, 13:45 PM
#19
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1096

another calliope nerf?

nice.....
21 Apr 2016, 13:51 PM
#20
avatar of pugzii

Posts: 513

some 5000 ladder 4v4 player making a balance thread yay
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
PatFenis: Hilarious how late people jump on the hate wagon. bro the train left the station 2 years ago. Fuck off and let this site die in peace.
Today, 10:20 AM
OKSpitfire: @aerafield :lolol:
Today, 09:13 AM
skemshead: Lol, you two idiots think i am referring to brown people and the female lead in the single campaign. Nothing to do with game being utter shit.
Today, 07:36 AM
skemshead: Coh3 target audience appears to be younger generation, console users and maybe asian nationalities ( hence the child like cartoon animation and colour scheme )
Today, 07:34 AM
aerafield: "all these bright colours and the woman in the campaign put my straight sexuality and conservative views in danger!"
Today, 03:08 AM
donofsandiego: "wehhh wehhhh, there are brown people and women in my WW2 video game, the woke mafia strikes again!!" :loco:
Today, 00:58 AM
berkeley: hi, how can i dump files with essence editor ? I want to dump images similar to this repo https://github.com/aoe4world
Yesterday, 22:47 PM
skemshead: @Rosbone Because its fucking shit. It is blatantly obvious that they changed their target audience and its not fucking mature white dudes.
Yesterday, 21:36 PM
Rosbone: Going full guano on 'em. :luvCarrot:
Yesterday, 12:13 PM
Rosbone: @skemshead "You cut me bro. You cut me deep." - Relic
Yesterday, 12:11 PM
skemshead: Coh3 is boring as batshit, no soul.
Yesterday, 10:36 AM
skemshead: Coh3 is also absolutely terrible from a spectator perspective.
Yesterday, 10:35 AM
skemshead: There is zero chance relic can turn coh3 around the way they did with coh2.
Yesterday, 10:32 AM
Rosbone: Hopefully we can look back and laugh in a couple years. But the Steam reviews are diving again so... :guyokay:
Last Thursday, 08:03 AM
Rosbone: @donofsandiego The counts are up a little. Coh3 actually passes Coh2 for a short period now. So Coh3 is no longer shit. It has a way to go to be "good". But it is healing. :gimpy:
Last Thursday, 08:01 AM
donofsandiego: :foreveralone::gimpy::mcsteve:
Last Thursday, 06:28 AM
donofsandiego: Last time I was on here my good friend Rosbone told me that CoH 3 is shit because it doesn't have visible kill counts. Well, it has them now. Where are the players?
Last Thursday, 06:27 AM
Rosbone: @Soheil Relic is in a hard spot. They need players for Coh3 so it hurts their Coh3 sales to make Coh2 even better than it already is. So we are all lost waiting for Coh3 to get finished to our liking.
Last Thursday, 02:50 AM
Rosbone: @Sinsa-Koso You can request it. But it will never be deleted :romeoHairDay:
Last Thursday, 02:48 AM
Sinsa-Koso: Hello! Can I request my account be deleted?
Last Thursday, 02:28 AM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

830 users are online: 830 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50026
Welcome our newest member, cpbigshipnet
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM