Posts: 4474
) joke 
Katitof-2018
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4474
All of the vanila unreleased commander were scrapped.
And if you don't see anything wrong with this commander, you don't really care for balance either.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 673
well it needs some changes but it would be a good counter to emplacment heavy doc
Posts: 4474
Maybe better fix heavy emplacement doc, instead of adding such doctrines?
For God sake, FHQ with retreat point and repair teams only for 30 fuel... I want it for my USSR urban doctrine NOW!
Katitof-2018
Posts: 673
we have better
Posts: 4474
We don't have those doctrines actually. And nobody asks to add them.
But I wanted to say only 1 thing - instead of adding "probably broken" doctrine for to counter antoher "definitely broken", better fix second one and play happy.
Fortification doctrine is obviously broken. Tommyrifles buidling and repairing emplacements? Free teams around FHQ for to repair them too?! Counterbattery in "not-Royal Artillery" doctrine!?!?!?!? WHY?!
Katitof-2018
Posts: 1162
Posts: 673
the fact is that i want more doc for the vanilla faction and the scrapped doc semmed really differnt fom the other
Posts: 4474
More doc? There are a lot already. What for you need more?
Another point is, that there are not so much really USEFUL doctrines for Ost and SU. And for USF. So, maybe better would be remake and overhaul some "old" and useless doctrines and make them more usefull, instead of trashing game with more and more commanders?
But... no Relic will prefer to make new, because... HERE COMES THE MONEY! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d26N2qlJdkE.
P.S. Lol, we had only 3 doctrines per faction in vCoH and that was MORE THAN ENOUGH!
Katitof-2018
Posts: 1891
Posts: 673
Urban assault would be good for USF, replace urban assault PzGrens with Paras and muni blitz with muni airdrop
Posts: 4474
Urban assault would be good for USF, replace urban assault PzGrens with Paras and muni blitz with muni airdrop
Katitof-2018
Posts: 1891
Since USF got "Heavy Cavalry" they don't need other doctrines. What for you need paras, arty, recon, whatever, when you can get both Rangers and M26 and start making hell?
Posts: 290
Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1
Posts: 673
Would be a very good and different commander that OST now is getting. FHQ commander for the only faction that don't have Forward retreat point would be very good idea.
Posts: 290
It's suprising, but Ostheers already have "FHQ" without retreat point. And it costs no fuel at all. Calls "Medbunker+Reinforce bunker". Works pretty same as soviet FHQ, healing, reinforcing, but without buff for soldiers. So, give them one more FHQ? What for?
Posts: 673
If you can read whole text, I meant forward RETREAT point. OST is only faction that has no doctrine to get their retreat point be anything else but back to base.
SU still has their own FHQ.
Posts: 4474
Maybe I missed something, but... Soviet FHQ has forward retreat point? Didn't use that since WFA added, may not know.
More than that, soviet FHQ putted into one of the most useless doctrines for late and middle game. Yea, it gives you superior bouns in early with FHQ (for 60 fuel, that makes your T3-T4 coming waaay later), but in late... no Shocks/Guards, no middle/heavy tanks. Only M-42. That Ost doctrine looks like more efficient for middle-late, than Soviet Urban Tactics. So, it will be pretty unbalanced.
And yea - Ostheer "Bunker-type FHQ" is non-doctrinal at all, but works pretty like Soviet one, only don't have that huge buff aura. Isn't that strange?
Katitof-2018
 |
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
193 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
