Login

russian armor

I strongly dislike chateau de luvnest

26 Feb 2016, 20:54 PM
#1
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

Honestly how can someone imagine and design a shitty map like that.

1- Center completely polluted by mud making any move completely slow: welcome if you try to take it back vs HMGs and paks with mortar covered behind. Your troop finish decimated before making 20 meters.
2- Flanking paths are blocked by choke points big houses easy to defend with a HMG.
3- Forget light vehicle play, mud everywhere in the center make any move completely slow and highly subject to ATguns/zooks/shrecks
4- your infantry finish completely decimated by mortar/arty so easily if catch in the mud.

If you are on the right and want to help left = mud + mud, only safe path is retreating everything to your base and use the other road.

this is an arty-campfest map where you can only use 2 roads with your tanks, full of mines, defended by atguns and HMGs in houses.
26 Feb 2016, 21:02 PM
#2
avatar of siuking666

Posts: 707

+1 Fuck that luvnest map. Why do they keep throwing shit maps into auto?!
26 Feb 2016, 21:04 PM
#3
avatar of broodwarjc

Posts: 824

They removed cancerous deep snow that slowed movement, why would they put in cancerous slowing mud?

I have only had one match on this map, but with the mud and the placement of houses for MGs... meh.
26 Feb 2016, 21:07 PM
#4
avatar of Imagelessbean

Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1

As a reminder, if you dislike a map, which you are entitled to, please do not belittle the creator. Maps are designed by real people, and sometimes they don't go as planned and sometimes they function in one way and not another.

This should not stop you from discussing the strategic weaknesses that make a map unsuitable for competitive play.
26 Feb 2016, 21:31 PM
#5
avatar of wuff

Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1

The map looks beautiful, no doubt about that.

I can't say how it plays since I don't touch 2v2 but have some respect for the designer (an actual human), even if you don't like it at least just be constructive.
26 Feb 2016, 21:35 PM
#6
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1096

Mud only serves the factions with frp's and vehicles that don't rely on mobility:( Not great for allies.
26 Feb 2016, 21:48 PM
#7
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

3rd circle of bans for community maps. Mapmakers are great people, and their commitement is creditable, but most custom maps simply dont belong to automatch due to balance flaws.
26 Feb 2016, 21:54 PM
#8
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

26 Feb 2016, 22:16 PM
#9
avatar of F1sh

Posts: 521

Still looks cool af
26 Feb 2016, 22:22 PM
#10
avatar of Mortar
Donator 22

Posts: 559

I love the criticisms of a mapmaker by people who have never even attempted to make one.

Think you can do better?

Put up or shut up. Or at the very least show some damn manners.

Entitled whiny babies. Good lord.
26 Feb 2016, 22:28 PM
#11
avatar of luvnest
Strategist Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20

I think the map is amazing:megusta:
26 Feb 2016, 22:45 PM
#12
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

All the new maps need removing

Don river or whatever it is is just as bad, way too small for a 2vs2
26 Feb 2016, 22:52 PM
#14
avatar of Slade

Posts: 8

weird I just ran units all over that map and none of them were slowed down in the mud...
26 Feb 2016, 23:25 PM
#15
avatar of edibleshrapnel

Posts: 552

No more Sturzdorf

26 Feb 2016, 23:28 PM
#16
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Feb 2016, 22:22 PMMortar
I love the criticisms of a mapmaker by people who have never even attempted to make one.

Think you can do better?

Put up or shut up. Or at the very least show some damn manners.

Entitled whiny babies. Good lord.


Besides the first opening sentence of OP, rest is just critic to the map. You don't need to be a chef to say something taste bad.
26 Feb 2016, 23:43 PM
#17
avatar of Mortar
Donator 22

Posts: 559



Besides the first opening sentence of OP, rest is just critic to the map. You don't need to be a chef to say something taste bad.


Besides the first opening sentence....blah blah blah.

My post was addressing the first sentence. A map maker takes his time to create something for the community for free on his own time. I would think you might want to defend THAT person instead of the one shitting all over him.

Anyways, trash me or the map maker now. I'm done with this thread.
27 Feb 2016, 00:17 AM
#18
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Feb 2016, 23:43 PMMortar

My post was addressing the first sentence. A map maker takes his time to create something for the community for free on his own time. I would think you might want to defend THAT person instead of the one shitting all over him.


I don't want to defend, the way OP used to critic the map, rather the remarks on the flaws on the map.
Reminder that map makers are not necessarily making maps for automatch. Take Sittard for example. We do not bash Mirage/Bacon for making the maps, rather Relic for putting them on rotation.

IMO the map should be on rotation, but just add more vetos for people who don't like specific maps.
27 Feb 2016, 00:26 AM
#19
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 236

Well, guess we all hate luvnest now.
27 Feb 2016, 00:31 AM
#20
avatar of Flying Dustbin

Posts: 270 | Subs: 1

Well, guess we all hate luvnest now.


:banned::luvCarrot::banned:
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

750 users are online: 750 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49070
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM