Putting T34/76 in T3 won't change a thing. It still will be quite useless. What's more, current price in T3 would be unacceptable, while increasing it's price will stand agasint performance.
That's why it's hard to put it in tech.
T34/85 non-doc.
T34/76 double/single call-in.
Soviet T3 and T4 suggestion
23 Feb 2016, 16:11 PM
#21
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
23 Feb 2016, 20:07 PM
#22
Posts: 2561
Reasons why this will never happen:
1. T34/76 has too much health to be in T3, axis players won't have enough AT
2. T34/85 in T4 invalidates the advantages of the P4
3. If there is no replacement in T4, T4 would simply be ignored by players
4. This ideas have been suggested since alpha and if relic actually thought it was a good idea they would have done it years ago.
1. T34/76 has too much health to be in T3, axis players won't have enough AT
2. T34/85 in T4 invalidates the advantages of the P4
3. If there is no replacement in T4, T4 would simply be ignored by players
4. This ideas have been suggested since alpha and if relic actually thought it was a good idea they would have done it years ago.
23 Feb 2016, 20:33 PM
#23
Posts: 125
Or you could all together learn how and when to use a T34/76 and stop proposing bad changes.
There are three commanders with T34/85, one commander with the M4 Sherman, another one with the KV-1, so you really do have options for a 'different' medium-like tank.
The T34/76 is not the tank you're looking for, but please, for rest of us that it is, leave it where it is. Thank you.
There are three commanders with T34/85, one commander with the M4 Sherman, another one with the KV-1, so you really do have options for a 'different' medium-like tank.
The T34/76 is not the tank you're looking for, but please, for rest of us that it is, leave it where it is. Thank you.
 | Playercard of Necrophagist | |||||||||||||||||||
|
23 Feb 2016, 21:20 PM
#24
Posts: 670
Or you could all together learn how and when to use a T34/76
You mean watching it burn five seconds after engaging the enemy?
but please, for rest of us
Rest of who? No one is using that tank
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
23 Feb 2016, 21:50 PM
#25
Posts: 2561
In all seriousness, the T-34 is bad. But it's not so bad that we need to be messing with soviet tech.
A simple buff or manpower reduction is all that needs to be done.
A simple buff or manpower reduction is all that needs to be done.
24 Feb 2016, 02:12 AM
#26
Posts: 640
In all seriousness, the T-34 is bad. But it's not so bad that we need to be messing with soviet tech.
A simple buff or manpower reduction is all that needs to be done.
Even when buffed and, it would just come too late when it's currently now in T4. Without giving it ridiculous buffs, you couldn't make it worth the cost in T4 IMO.
24 Feb 2016, 02:47 AM
#27
Posts: 2561
how is coming out at the same time as p4 and Sherman too late? If it came out any earlier it would be the only medium tank during a time where there is only light vehicles.
Even when buffed and, it would just come too late when it's currently now in T4. Without giving it ridiculous buffs, you couldn't make it worth the cost in T4 IMO.
24 Feb 2016, 06:10 AM
#28
Posts: 53
how is coming out at the same time as p4 and Sherman too late? If it came out any earlier it would be the only medium tank during a time where there is only light vehicles.
And now it arrives when it is an unarmed jar
24 Feb 2016, 07:54 AM
#29
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
how is coming out at the same time as p4 and Sherman too late? If it came out any earlier it would be the only medium tank during a time where there is only light vehicles.
Something like OKW panther hitting the field before other factions with equivalents even think about teching to unlock the equivalent?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
24 Feb 2016, 08:06 AM
#30
Posts: 118
In all seriousness, the T-34 is bad. But it's not so bad that we need to be messing with soviet tech.
A simple buff or manpower reduction is all that needs to be done.
But soviet commanders need the t34/85 at T4 anyways.
Something like OKW panther hitting the field before factions with equivalents even think about teching to unlock the equivalent?
Indeed OKW panther can hit the field extremely early, and not only that, have you tried team games with supply drops? you can feed teammates to get 2 KT around minute 11/14.
24 Feb 2016, 08:32 AM
#31
Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1
Ehhh I like the suggestion of two T34/76s in one price bundle.
Call in t34/76 just wouldn't work. If Ostheer/Soviets were designed around crappy medium-tank call ins (panzer 3 pls), that would work, but call in t34/76? nawww. not worth it.
Call in t34/76 just wouldn't work. If Ostheer/Soviets were designed around crappy medium-tank call ins (panzer 3 pls), that would work, but call in t34/76? nawww. not worth it.
24 Feb 2016, 08:36 AM
#32
Posts: 118
Ehhh I like the suggestion of two T34/76s in one price bundle.
Call in t34/76 just wouldn't work. If Ostheer/Soviets were designed around crappy medium-tank call ins (panzer 3 pls), that would work, but call in t34/76? nawww. not worth it.
If it gets some bufs or cap territory changes or ram changes it could be worth it. Or if we get crazy it could be transformed into OT34 or t34/57 or elite vet3 t34s.
24 Feb 2016, 10:00 AM
#33
Posts: 125
You mean watching it burn five seconds after engaging the enemy?
As I said, you're using it wrong.
Rest of who? No one is using that tank
I've seen it enough times in competitive 1v1.
| Playercard of Necrophagist | |||||||||||||||||||
|
24 Feb 2016, 10:06 AM
#34
Posts: 670
As I said, you're using it wrong.
Please enlighten me, oh great one
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
24 Feb 2016, 11:28 AM
#35
Posts: 125
Please enlighten me, oh great one
That won't be necessary
| Playercard of Necrophagist | |||||||||||||||||||
|
24 Feb 2016, 11:45 AM
#36
Posts: 670
That won't be necessary
ok den, continue your odyssey to 1st place in 1v1 soviets by your uber smart play with t-34s while desperately protecting your replays from the others to avoid letting them steal your precious tactics
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
24 Feb 2016, 12:10 PM
#37
Posts: 125
ok den, continue your odyssey to 1st place in 1v1 soviets by your uber smart play with t-34s while desperately protecting your replays from the others to avoid letting them steal your precious tactics
If you dislike it so much why don't you use one of the 5 commanders that offer an alternative? ^^
Faction symmetry isn't something people want. Deal with the fact that the Soviet faction lacks a medium tank.
| Playercard of Necrophagist | |||||||||||||||||||
|
24 Feb 2016, 12:34 PM
#38
Posts: 670
If you dislike it so much why don't you use one of the 5 commanders that offer an alternative? ^^
Faction symmetry isn't something people want. Deal with the fact that the Soviet faction lacks a medium tank.
It's not that i want a medium tank, I want something that can be used and not lead to defeat
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
24 Feb 2016, 13:04 PM
#39
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
since ive been playing soviets exclusive for the past weeks i can say i only use t34/76 to seal the deal against ostheer. doing base drive bys with them. wont work against okw because flak and shreks.
but i cant seem to use t34/85 either, they seem to suck so hard for me but im not a good player either just maxims let me rank up so easily.
but i cant seem to use t34/85 either, they seem to suck so hard for me but im not a good player either just maxims let me rank up so easily.
24 Feb 2016, 13:19 PM
#40
Posts: 640
...im not a good player either just maxims let me rank up so easily.
The first step is accepting the truth
I don't maxim spam because you don't learn anything by doing it. I hate the players who think they are good because they get high ranks spamming maxims... or using anything that happens to be broken at the time to gain ladder ranks. Such ignorance. Getting a bit off-topic here though.
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
229 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
399 users are online:
399 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49063
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM