Well it has been released and performance is still pretty bad. Even at medium settings the Nvidia GTX Titan 6GB at 1680x1050 is LOWER than 60 fps.
The game is nice looking - but it's hard to believe that not even the undisputed fastest card in the world 2013 cannot get over 60 fps at medium settings at a low resolution...
http://www.techspot.com/review/689-company-of-heroes-2-performance/page2.html
CoH2 performance is... bad
4 Jul 2013, 07:59 AM
#1
Posts: 50
4 Jul 2013, 08:23 AM
#2
Posts: 391
Meh. I can see why techspot is moaning, because they're benchmarking it. However, I have a 6870 and an i5-4670. It is less that 60 fps, but on the flip, it doesn't ever lag.
Perhaps because my PCs have always been shit, so I dont' know what I'm looking for, but it is still totally playable to me on high settings. I don't see the problem.
Perhaps because my PCs have always been shit, so I dont' know what I'm looking for, but it is still totally playable to me on high settings. I don't see the problem.
4 Jul 2013, 08:26 AM
#3
Posts: 5
Something is weird with that review.. maybe they had bad cpu? Too little memory?
I dont believe that GTX Titan is the fps bottleneck with their testing setup.
I have gtx 660 ti and i5-3570k. I play with highest settings at 1680x1050, and I have yet to see any performance issues. I disabled the filters and antialiasing though. They make everything look worse.
I dont believe that GTX Titan is the fps bottleneck with their testing setup.
I have gtx 660 ti and i5-3570k. I play with highest settings at 1680x1050, and I have yet to see any performance issues. I disabled the filters and antialiasing though. They make everything look worse.
I accidentally the whole message
4 Jul 2013, 11:02 AM
#4
Posts: 44
Performance is acknowledged to be flawed, Nvidia is working on finding optimizations for their next driver. It supposedly runs a bit better on AMD cards, I have no idea about the validity of that but I know Nvidia is looking for performance optimizations.
AndyBNV said so on NeoGAF.
AndyBNV said so on NeoGAF.
4 Jul 2013, 14:45 PM
#5
Posts: 396
The performance is bad tbh in comparison with the first game from 6 years ago.
Then I read this guide (some of it is in german)
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=156776308#103021
Essentially what it's saying is that the replay recording is draining your pc's resources. This guys specs were somewhat similar to my own and I assume they are for most of the people that are having issues. My specs on a build I did myself in 2009:
Core I7
6 GB of RAM
AMD 7850
ASUS P6T Turbo
While the 7850 isn't the greatest card in the world and 6 gigs of ram is mediocre atm, there is not reason that this game shouldn't run smoothly on mine and other rigs at 50-60 fps. Nothing in this game is, graphically speaking, that special.
back to the topic at hand - WHY DOES THE REPLAY RECORDING SYSTEM DRAIN RESOURCES LIKE THIS WHEN THE SYSTEM FROM THE 1st GAME FROM 6 YEARS AGO WORKED FINE???? WHY CAN'T I SEE THE CHAT????
It's the things like this that are really disappointing in this game.
Then I read this guide (some of it is in german)
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=156776308#103021
Essentially what it's saying is that the replay recording is draining your pc's resources. This guys specs were somewhat similar to my own and I assume they are for most of the people that are having issues. My specs on a build I did myself in 2009:
Core I7
6 GB of RAM
AMD 7850
ASUS P6T Turbo
While the 7850 isn't the greatest card in the world and 6 gigs of ram is mediocre atm, there is not reason that this game shouldn't run smoothly on mine and other rigs at 50-60 fps. Nothing in this game is, graphically speaking, that special.
back to the topic at hand - WHY DOES THE REPLAY RECORDING SYSTEM DRAIN RESOURCES LIKE THIS WHEN THE SYSTEM FROM THE 1st GAME FROM 6 YEARS AGO WORKED FINE???? WHY CAN'T I SEE THE CHAT????
It's the things like this that are really disappointing in this game.
4 Jul 2013, 15:15 PM
#6
Posts: 604
Huh really? Why would replay recording cause such problems? They are just a few hundred kB small... or is it using some insane and unnecessary comprimation thingy?
4 Jul 2013, 15:54 PM
#7
Posts: 1
The performance is bad tbh in comparison with the first game from 6 years ago.
Then I read this guide (some of it is in german)
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=156776308#103021
thats not german
4 Jul 2013, 18:45 PM
#8
Posts: 1560 | Subs: 1
Well it has been released and performance is still pretty bad. Even at medium settings the Nvidia GTX Titan 6GB at 1680x1050 is LOWER than 60 fps.
The game is nice looking - but it's hard to believe that not even the undisputed fastest card in the world 2013 cannot get over 60 fps at medium settings at a low resolution...
http://www.techspot.com/review/689-company-of-heroes-2-performance/page2.html
Must be a bunch of amateurs..
Did they use a dual core and 2GB of ram for the rest of the testing rig, or what? I easily double the FPS of a Titan (according to their results) in 1v1s at highest settings. This is not a good test imo.
4 Jul 2013, 18:49 PM
#9
Posts: 3709 | Subs: 2
Something is weird with that review.. maybe they had bad cpu? Too little memory?
I dont believe that GTX Titan is the fps bottleneck with their testing setup.
I have gtx 660 ti and i5-3570k. I play with highest settings at 1680x1050, and I have yet to see any performance issues. I disabled the filters and antialiasing though. They make everything look worse.
What are those filters you are talking about and how to disable them ?
I can't wait for the proper nvidia driver though it's kinda annoying.
4 Jul 2013, 19:11 PM
#10
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
Probably anisotropic filtering.
Signature by Ginnungagap
4 Jul 2013, 19:20 PM
#11
Posts: 32
I have a i5-3570 with a gtx 660 3 gb 8 gb ram and i play the game on high setting with a good 80 ish FPS depend on the situation might be higher or lower (Blizzar)
4 Jul 2013, 19:40 PM
#12
Posts: 954
blizzard is fps killer, can we turn off the blizzard effect?
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
4 Jul 2013, 19:51 PM
#13
Posts: 331
Well it has been released and performance is still pretty bad. Even at medium settings the Nvidia GTX Titan 6GB at 1680x1050 is LOWER than 60 fps.
The game is nice looking - but it's hard to believe that not even the undisputed fastest card in the world 2013 cannot get over 60 fps at medium settings at a low resolution...
http://www.techspot.com/review/689-company-of-heroes-2-performance/page2.html
If you read the intro, they tell you they used the in-game benchmark feature. Which I find highly inaccurate.
11 Jul 2013, 12:08 PM
#14
Posts: 46
Well, in my opinion, more graphics options would be nice like how it was in COH1 so we are able to customize the settings a bit more to our liking based on our specs.
Those Yankees will pay when we find them!
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
103 | ||
 |
|
|
46 | ||
|
|
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.842223.791+5
- 2.655231.739+15
- 3.1103405.731+8
- 4.943411.696-1
- 5.715.934+12
- 6.35659.858+2
- 7.275145.655+1
- 8.307114.729+3
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
12
Download
1269