Lockdown all buildings on the map at the start of a match

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 615

3 Feb 2016, 15:59 PMwhitesky00

snip...

3 Feb 2016, 16:10 PMKatitof

snip...

Tidied some post here...play nice with others or someone will take away your toys!

Posts: 615

3 Feb 2016, 01:03 AMferwiner

Shhh, I'll give you advice but don't tell anybody, it's a secret: Units in green cover win against units in building cover.

Only If:

a) Unit in green cover is within 10m of garrisoned unit

or

b) Unit in garrison has plenty of windows to shoot from

Playercard of NorthWeapon

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

COH2 YouTube Channel

I'm making a videogame based off of CoH2

Multi Quote

Posts: 615

Also units like Sturmpios and Infantry Sections have an advantage taking buildings :/

Playercard of NorthWeapon

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

COH2 YouTube Channel

I'm making a videogame based off of CoH2

Multi Quote

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

3 Feb 2016, 14:35 PMferwiner

Must have missed that one. Do you know when it got changed?

Like an year ago.

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 51

@NW; True, which leads into a highly aggressive early game.

Posts: 444

Only engineers can break open houses so only then your other infantry can enter buildings.
Takes about the same time as cutting wire. Kreygasm Kreygasm Kreygasm

Or make it so all infantry can do it, but less time with engineers.

Playercard of Looney

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

Multi Quote

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

again, "setup" time and "pack up" time for infantry in building. its more realistic instead of instant teleporting 6 guys out of a church and it makes occuping buildings more dangerous (high risk/high reward) due nades becoming more lethal and general flamers/arty because you cant just hop out/hop in.

plus point would be the dimishing of these building hoppers, its so annyoing and there is no counterplay to it.

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

8 Feb 2016, 12:23 PMBananenheld

again, "setup" time and "pack up" time for infantry in building. its more realistic instead of instant teleporting 6 guys out of a church and it makes occuping buildings more dangerous (high risk/high reward) due nades becoming more lethal and general flamers/arty because you cant just hop out/hop in.

plus point would be the dimishing of these building hoppers, its so annyoing and there is no counterplay to it.

Best idea. And increase pack up time of HMGs in building.

Posts: 83

8 Feb 2016, 12:23 PMBananenheld

again, "setup" time and "pack up" time for infantry in building. its more realistic instead of instant teleporting 6 guys out of a church and it makes occuping buildings more dangerous (high risk/high reward) due nades becoming more lethal and general flamers/arty because you cant just hop out/hop in.

plus point would be the dimishing of these building hoppers, its so annyoing and there is no counterplay to it.

Agreed. This makes sense from both a realism AND a gameplay perspective.

Posts: 2470

best idea, make both short and long ranged garrison counter available from the start.

Posts: 468

3 Feb 2016, 17:29 PMKobunite

Tidied some post here...play nice with others or someone will take away your toys!

I'm sorry but it's hard to take the OP seriously when he just makes an account and creates 4 threads in a balance section when it should belong in the strategy/help section.