How does all of the thread made by Siuking go to a complete clusterfuck flaming wars?
Don't move the StuG, it's fine in T3, it coming in t2 would make every kind of light vehicle play impossible for allies and this is something we don't want, make the pak a t1 unit which you're able to build after taking a battle battle phase and move the sniper to T2
Start thinking about Su76 coming from t2? Would that be balanced? That would be almost the same thing as moving the Stug to T2
Move StuG III-G to T2 or T2.5
25 Jan 2016, 08:23 AM
#21
Posts: 498
www.twitch.tv/rawv1 
usf 
okw 
soviets 
ostheer
"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the winFI
In game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT
usf okw soviets ostheer"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the win
FIIn game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT
25 Jan 2016, 08:26 AM
#22
Posts: 83
How does all of the thread made by Siuking go to a complete clusterfuck flaming wars?
Don't move the StuG, it's fine in T3, it coming in t2 would make every kind of light vehicle play impossible for allies and this is something we don't want, make the pak a t1 unit which you're able to build after taking a battle battle phase and move the sniper to T2
Start thinking about Su76 coming from t2? Would that be balanced? That would be almost the same thing as moving the Stug to T2
Yeah, my immediate thoughts when I saw the thread title.
25 Jan 2016, 08:31 AM
#23
Posts: 2561
If a unit has 640 health, it doesn't belong in tier 2.
25 Jan 2016, 08:35 AM
#24
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Can we have Sherman T2 as well? and Stuart T1. You can move the pak T3 to balance it.
25 Jan 2016, 08:36 AM
#25
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If a unit has 640 health, it doesn't belong in tier 2.
It has 560, but it doesn't make any difference.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
25 Jan 2016, 08:40 AM
#26
Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1
Invissed two posts.
The internal battery has run dry, the game can now be played. However, clock based events will no longer occur.
25 Jan 2016, 08:48 AM
#27
Posts: 106
Would prefer PaK to T1 and Sniper to T2, thing as that would address a lot of balance problems.
+1
25 Jan 2016, 09:14 AM
#28
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
I want a panzer 3, not some dirty re use of vehicles DansGame
25 Jan 2016, 12:23 PM
#29
Posts: 707
How does all of the thread made by Siuking go to a complete clusterfuck flaming wars?
Don't move the StuG, it's fine in T3, it coming in t2 would make every kind of light vehicle play impossible for allies and this is something we don't want, make the pak a t1 unit which you're able to build after taking a battle battle phase and move the sniper to T2
Start thinking about Su76 coming from t2? Would that be balanced? That would be almost the same thing as moving the Stug to T2
Even if you builds T2, you still have to get 90 fuel to field one out.
Soviet T2 is FREE. They only need 85 for T3 then 75 for SU76.
Ost unlock T2 is 40, T2 building 20, then put a T3 unlock requirement on it.
Playercard: http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198005198550
My Theater of War Guide, Every missions on General/achievements/Grand Strategy:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=309197460
My Guide of Using German Voices with English Text Tweak:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=492709499
CoH2 Epic Moments Index:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=573921959
My Theater of War Guide, Every missions on General/achievements/Grand Strategy:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=309197460
My Guide of Using German Voices with English Text Tweak:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=492709499
CoH2 Epic Moments Index:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=573921959
25 Jan 2016, 14:04 PM
#30
Posts: 284
Nope... T2 would be too early for StuG.
I would rather get rid of the 222 and change it to a Puma
I would rather get rid of the 222 and change it to a Puma
25 Jan 2016, 14:07 PM
#31
Posts: 587
Ost needs some non-doc light vehicle/tank to keep up with all the others (stuart t70 m5 and now AEC).
Not sure if StuG is the answer.
222 rework is better i think.
Not sure if StuG is the answer.
222 rework is better i think.
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
25 Jan 2016, 14:08 PM
#32
Posts: 77
BannedWould prefer PaK to T1 and Sniper to T2, thing as that would address a lot of balance problems.
+1
25 Jan 2016, 14:30 PM
#33
Posts: 640
Might give a bit of breathing room for UKF from the double Ost sniper start that bleeds them harshly currently.
The thing is, Ostheer kind of needs the sniper to be competitive against the riflemen
25 Jan 2016, 14:43 PM
#34
Posts: 245
lets move the best cost efficient tank in the game down a tier? How about no. lol
25 Jan 2016, 15:44 PM
#35
Posts: 1487
Soviet T2 is FREE. They only need 85 for T3 then 75 for SU76.
Ost unlock T2 is 40, T2 building 20, then put a T3 unlock requirement on it.
More breaking news t2 is free
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
25 Jan 2016, 15:47 PM
#36
Posts: 150
but then you're just gonna see stug spam into tiger call in
25 Jan 2016, 16:08 PM
#37
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Even if you builds T2, you still have to get 90 fuel to field one out.
Soviet T2 is FREE. They only need 85 for T3 then 75 for SU76.
Ost unlock T2 is 40, T2 building 20, then put a T3 unlock requirement on it.
But then again Soviets don't get free at nade and molotov as part of their teching, and they have to put down another 120 fuel in order to get proper tanks.
It would make Ost vs Sov teching completely lobsided.
25 Jan 2016, 16:56 PM
#38
1 
Posts: 2885
Dont change the ostheer, they are the best designed faction. Change other factions if there is a need. Also this proposition is simply ridiculous and we all know you know it OP.
25 Jan 2016, 17:12 PM
#39
Posts: 1220
Would prefer PaK to T1 and Sniper to T2, thing as that would address a lot of balance problems.
love this idea
25 Jan 2016, 18:34 PM
#40
Posts: 468
love this idea
wouldn't this just destroy SOV T1 M3 and UKF carrier?
I don't know the values but I think the pak40 one-shots or reduces hp by 95%
New OST build order, 1 MG, 1 pak40 at the beginning of game. Engis sight, MG suppress, pak kills vehicles. Point lock down the moment the game begins...
| Playercard of BeRyan | |||||||||||||||
|
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
85 | ||
 |
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
50 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
830 users are online:
830 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM