Interesting Results from 4v4AT Round 1
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
I think we need to revisit balance - axis op anymore certainly doesn't seem true.
Thoughts?
Posts: 301
Probably, 4v4 is a game by itself.
How many games where played? is there a replay pack aviable?
Kozo.
Posts: 732
Posts: 311
Of course the Americans have the Calliope and the Brits have the "Press the Button"-artillery that is quite good now.
Posts: 513
Play with randoms: Axis OP, allies shit.
Play with coordinated team: Allies OP, axis shit.
cant fix it im afraid.
Posts: 474
Posts: 444
Though allies might be stronger, but imo not by a huge margin.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
We're also talking about a pretty small sample size of what... 4-8 games?
Posts: 615
It would be nice if coh2chart.com incorporated arranged team stats. I bet they are very balanced.
Posts: 1122
Like seriously, you gotta abuse hard (coz allies do). 5-6 volks shreck uberblob spam into 2-3 stukas into jt. isg spam with flare spam into luchs and situational puma/jp4 into cp or kt. Hard mhts, stug spam and hard pwerfer spam. paks 43 n other good stuff like command p4 and cp aura stacking, overall coordination.
Most axis teams just play like "well i gotta use self-sufficient regular crap which smashes randoms" getting caught out of position, punished by mines and demos, than totally destroyed by well-used shock units which they don't prepare for like op usf 3cp quad and its gg.
Btw, 128 streak which started in glorious days of old ober terminators, kubel ace and jt which could shot trough shot blockers by default. Compared to balance back than current allies is walk in a park, nerf plz.
Posts: 823 | Subs: 3
Allies won every game by a large margin.
I think we need to revisit balance - axis op anymore certainly doesn't seem true.
Thoughts?
can't be made different or precious balance of 1v1 pro mode is in danger MVGame
Allies is really strong with their Infantry. USF alone , Guards, Shocks, Commandoes, and then in a fight between vickers and mg42 the vickers wins it unless mg42 has rate of fire bulletins
so you have to hold against it and then get your first tank out as axis , and boom, calliope, katyusha for the inf and it goes downhill. and then to counter their tanks you have a tank, while allies infantry is still going after you, if done with teamwork and denying axis to have fuel you pretty much win it.
As another point i think that there are more viable soviet commanders than wehrmacht commanders, and commanders of USF just push you to another level.
Last but not least, Grenadiers just die like Flies to every indirect fire. Infantry Sections are only 4 men, but don't die to random mortar shots.
For Tank battles axis have to rely on panther or the heavy call ins, while soviets have then mark target (if not then wtf why you dont want to help your team) and brits artillery cover, while IS-2 and KT is mostly a fair fight and JT can be punished so easily by just getting snared, same goes for elefant. Pretty much another reason, because the only real good things axis have is JU-87, which gets just ripped down by centaur.
In general you could just make a list like this :
stuart can bang puma easily, while luchs can't bang a stuart (unless poorly microed) = more punishment
Vickers > MG42 in a house to house fight (unless rate of fire bulletins)
Grenadiers just have a real hard time with just 4 men that also get wiped really easy.
Allies Mines > Wehrmacht mines , OKW is pretty much a fair deal. But you have to decide between s mines or teller as wehrmacht.
Pack howi > Leig gun
If you don't get the better position, you will lose. And in that regard allies have the clearly advantage.. As Axis you have to coordinate way better, way more aggresive support weapon play and you can be punished much easier.
If you succeed, you might win, if you lose it, shit's coming down at you soon
So in general : Axis mistakes in early and mid get punished way harder than allied mistakes
Posts: 1273
E.g. Brit TankStunArty + Mark Target + P47 + 2xJacksons = Dead 3-4 Panthers
Posts: 118
Posts: 77
BannedHello.
Probably, 4v4 is a game by itself.
How many games where played? is there a replay pack aviable?
Kozo.
Not aviable no. There is a pack available though.
Posts: 254
Allies won every game by a large margin.
I think we need to revisit balance - axis op anymore certainly doesn't seem true.
Thoughts?
Frankly, I am not surprised!
Due to the early game advantage of allies, it is realy, it seems not possible to win as axis. e.g. both games won by allies when a qualified team plays them.
Anyway, the community seems to see this differently.
Posts: 354
Posts: 468
can't be made different or precious balance of 1v1 pro mode is in danger MVGame
Allies is really strong with their Infantry. USF alone , Guards, Shocks, Commandoes, and then in a fight between vickers and mg42 the vickers wins it unless mg42 has rate of fire bulletins
so you have to hold against it and then get your first tank out as axis , and boom, calliope, katyusha for the inf and it goes downhill. and then to counter their tanks you have a tank, while allies infantry is still going after you, if done with teamwork and denying axis to have fuel you pretty much win it.
As another point i think that there are more viable soviet commanders than wehrmacht commanders, and commanders of USF just push you to another level.
Last but not least, Grenadiers just die like Flies to every indirect fire. Infantry Sections are only 4 men, but don't die to random mortar shots.
For Tank battles axis have to rely on panther or the heavy call ins, while soviets have then mark target (if not then wtf why you dont want to help your team) and brits artillery cover, while IS-2 and KT is mostly a fair fight and JT can be punished so easily by just getting snared, same goes for elefant. Pretty much another reason, because the only real good things axis have is JU-87, which gets just ripped down by centaur.
In general you could just make a list like this :
stuart can bang puma easily, while luchs can't bang a stuart (unless poorly microed) = more punishment
Vickers > MG42 in a house to house fight (unless rate of fire bulletins)
Grenadiers just have a real hard time with just 4 men that also get wiped really easy.
Allies Mines > Wehrmacht mines , OKW is pretty much a fair deal. But you have to decide between s mines or teller as wehrmacht.
Pack howi > Leig gun
If you don't get the better position, you will lose. And in that regard allies have the clearly advantage.. As Axis you have to coordinate way better, way more aggresive support weapon play and you can be punished much easier.
If you succeed, you might win, if you lose it, shit's coming down at you soon
So in general : Axis mistakes in early and mid get punished way harder than allied mistakes
WOW. just wow... i haven't see a strong axis fanboi in the post until this came along and compelled me to reply. KT and IS2 on equal footing? nooo, i don't think so. anyone else on this forum agree?
Mark target means you don't get a heavy... Axis has one on the command panther too!
Pack howi > leig gun? oh please... vet and range is way better. I'd trade you for an leig...
Both 4 men IS and gren squads get wiped easily... except one costs more and the cheaper one gets a snare as well
Vickers is better at killing things. mg42 is better at suppressing things. Please give me a suppression platform... i need it to control blobs. also mg42 is cheaper.
this guy/girl complains about katyusha... the most balanced rocket artillery in the game and then onto the calliope without mentioning the panzerwerfer.
If you deny fuel for either side, that's pretty much a huge advantage on either Axis or Allies side... what a poor argument
How are Allied mines better? You cannot pick and choose your enemy. teller mines will only target vehicles if that's what you want. and s-mines will deny an area or kill enemies on retreat if you place them well....
Why don't you go into 230 fuel croc versus a 230 fuel tiger... I want a tiger. 230 fuel is2 or 230 fuel tiger... i'd still probably go with tiger. 230 fuel pershing or 230 fuel tiger... debatable and situational but tiger has the HP advantage and blitz
you complain about allies infantry but not shrek blob in team games?... phail
please present an unbiased view please.
Posts: 823 | Subs: 3
WOW. just wow... i haven't see a strong axis fanboi in the post until this came along and compelled me to reply. KT and IS2 on equal footing? nooo, i don't think so. anyone else on this forum agree?
Mark target means you don't get a heavy... Axis has one on the command panther too!
Pack howi > leig gun? oh please... vet and range is way better. I'd trade you for an leig...
Both 4 men IS and gren squads get wiped easily... except one costs more and the cheaper one gets a snare as well
Vickers is better at killing things. mg42 is better at suppressing things. Please give me a suppression platform... i need it to control blobs. also mg42 is cheaper.
this guy/girl complains about katyusha... the most balanced rocket artillery in the game and then onto the calliope without mentioning the panzerwerfer.
If you deny fuel for either side, that's pretty much a huge advantage on either Axis or Allies side... what a poor argument
How are Allied mines better? You cannot pick and choose your enemy. teller mines will only target vehicles if that's what you want. and s-mines will deny an area or kill enemies on retreat if you place them well....
Why don't you go into 230 fuel croc versus a 230 fuel tiger... I want a tiger. 230 fuel is2 or 230 fuel tiger... i'd still probably go with tiger. 230 fuel pershing or 230 fuel tiger... debatable and situational but tiger has the HP advantage and blitz
you complain about allies infantry but not shrek blob in team games?... phail
please present an unbiased view please.
thread was not about shreckblobs, just for your info :> i don't complain, i just state it how it is. It was about ALLIES being strong.
Also, playcard mr scrub. IS-2 losing to a tiger, in what universe you live?
and before more shit comes out of your mouth, playercard.
Edit: saw you put your playercard in after i read your post, Mr 4v4 Random hero. Like 4v4 randoms and AT is the same bro
Posts: 959
Allies won every game by a large margin.
I think we need to revisit balance - axis op anymore certainly doesn't seem true.
Thoughts?
no man, it's only because Axis teams DID NOT play good and allies teams played better,
mainly because most of those teams are allies teams (better with allies) (in team games), not to mention some of them are not familiar/experienced with 4v4 game/meta so u can't judge it according to that
if you disagree, name me one team that played good axis!(at least those that I've seen so far) they all played bad because most of them don't know how to play axis (in bigger team games like this), or they are not experienced in 4v4
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
IS-2 losing to a tiger, in what universe you live?
An universe where tanks are on the move and take advantage of their maximum range.
Livestreams
569 | |||||
11 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, sunwinctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM