Once and for all. Katyusha does not need any buffs.
Calliope and PzWerfer need nerfs.
As ESL Shows BM 13 Katusha need a little buff
18 Jan 2016, 17:14 PM
#21
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
18 Jan 2016, 17:18 PM
#22
Posts: 738
If the Katusha needs a buff what does the Sexton need?
18 Jan 2016, 17:20 PM
#23
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
exactly. for a doctrinal 140fuel unit.
Doctrinaly have nothing with unit performance.
Doctrine give you more options not better units.
Units cost should reflect its performance not if it is doctrinal or indoctrinal unit.
Katty cost 85 fuel and dies to sneeze
Calli cost
Yes it does not looks like fair deal , so then I think calli should get price decrease to 120 fuel (you will pay 35 fuel for bigger survivability , and I think that will be fine)
All thinks are after mine nerfs to all units
18 Jan 2016, 17:22 PM
#24
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
If the Katusha needs a buff what does the Sexton need?
Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency.
But not really , make it like ostheer Lehft on wheels. (low damage and AOE compared to ml , priest but good RoF per barrage and decent Accuraccy)
Then fuel cost can go to 90 - 100 fuel
18 Jan 2016, 17:31 PM
#25
Posts: 1702
Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency.
But not really , make it like ostheer Lehft on wheels. (low damage and AOE compared to ml , priest but good RoF per barrage and decent Accuraccy)
Then fuel cost can go to 90 - 100 fuel
You do know that the Lehft has the way better aoe than the ml-20? It is significantly more lethal againts infantry + has higher RoF + fires more shells.
The sexton has around 4 times less AoE than the ml-20 i believe.
18 Jan 2016, 17:42 PM
#26
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
You do know that the Lehft has the way better aoe than the ml-20? It is significantly more lethal againts infantry + has higher RoF + fires more shells.
The sexton has around 4 times less AoE than the ml-20 i believe.
Wow , from when.
What I remeber ml20 was laways better than lehft.
However both of them suck in 1v1 so I have not build them like year so maybe something have changed
18 Jan 2016, 17:47 PM
#27
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency.
So we need more unused cheap trash like T-34-76
18 Jan 2016, 19:02 PM
#28
Posts: 468
Wow , from when.
What I remeber ml20 was laways better than lehft.
However both of them suck in 1v1 so I have not build them like year so maybe something have changed
I don't know the details. I just know that ML20 had longer range? It was buffed with extra salvos but became OP? So, then it was nerfed to fewer salvos. The German artillery was similar
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
11 | |||||
25 | |||||
6 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
1062 users are online:
1062 guests
1 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50008
Welcome our newest member, Goynet40
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Goynet40
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM