Login

russian armor

As ESL Shows BM 13 Katusha need a little buff

18 Jan 2016, 17:14 PM
#21
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Once and for all. Katyusha does not need any buffs.

Calliope and PzWerfer need nerfs.
18 Jan 2016, 17:18 PM
#22
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

If the Katusha needs a buff what does the Sexton need? :blush:
18 Jan 2016, 17:20 PM
#23
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7



exactly. for a doctrinal 140fuel unit.


Doctrinaly have nothing with unit performance.

Doctrine give you more options not better units.


Units cost should reflect its performance not if it is doctrinal or indoctrinal unit.



Katty cost 85 fuel and dies to sneeze


Calli cost 140 120 fuel and needs 3 shots from reliable AT to be killed (Eg not falls with assault rifles).

Yes it does not looks like fair deal , so then I think calli should get price decrease to 120 fuel (you will pay 35 fuel for bigger survivability , and I think that will be fine)


All thinks are after mine nerfs to all units

18 Jan 2016, 17:22 PM
#24
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jan 2016, 17:18 PMRollo
If the Katusha needs a buff what does the Sexton need? :blush:


Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency.

But not really , make it like ostheer Lehft on wheels. (low damage and AOE compared to ml , priest but good RoF per barrage and decent Accuraccy)

Then fuel cost can go to 90 - 100 fuel
18 Jan 2016, 17:31 PM
#25
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702



Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency.

But not really , make it like ostheer Lehft on wheels. (low damage and AOE compared to ml , priest but good RoF per barrage and decent Accuraccy)

Then fuel cost can go to 90 - 100 fuel



You do know that the Lehft has the way better aoe than the ml-20? It is significantly more lethal againts infantry + has higher RoF + fires more shells.

The sexton has around 4 times less AoE than the ml-20 i believe.
18 Jan 2016, 17:42 PM
#26
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jan 2016, 17:31 PMBurts



You do know that the Lehft has the way better aoe than the ml-20? It is significantly more lethal againts infantry + has higher RoF + fires more shells.

The sexton has around 4 times less AoE than the ml-20 i believe.


Wow , from when.


What I remeber ml20 was laways better than lehft.

However both of them suck in 1v1 so I have not build them like year so maybe something have changed
18 Jan 2016, 17:47 PM
#27
avatar of TAKTCOM

Posts: 275 | Subs: 1


Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency.

:sibHyena: So we need more unused cheap trash like T-34-76:snfPeter:
18 Jan 2016, 19:02 PM
#28
avatar of whitesky00

Posts: 468



Wow , from when.


What I remeber ml20 was laways better than lehft.

However both of them suck in 1v1 so I have not build them like year so maybe something have changed


I don't know the details. I just know that ML20 had longer range? It was buffed with extra salvos but became OP? So, then it was nerfed to fewer salvos. The German artillery was similar
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

997 users are online: 997 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM