This idea is as bad as having planes crashing planes randomly crashing into the battlefield. Each fight tells a different story.
having planes crashing planes randomly chrashing? are you sure you arent jaden smith?
Mortars should cause abandon on tanks with exposed crew
12 Jan 2016, 19:28 PM
#21
Posts: 12
having planes crashing planes randomly chrashing? are you sure you arent jaden smith?
12 Jan 2016, 19:50 PM
#22
Posts: 738
I agree, but only because UKF have no access to open top tanks and all other factions need a healthy nerd.
12 Jan 2016, 19:59 PM
#23
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
horrible idea
12 Jan 2016, 20:23 PM
#24
Posts: 935
I think 1 roket of BM13 should move turret away from KT and put it somewhere near. It would be so great!
12 Jan 2016, 20:24 PM
#25
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Technically mortars already can if they penetrate a low health tank and finish it off to trigger the critical
Those stacked Mortar Armor Penetration+ Bulletins guys, amirite?
Those stacked Mortar Armor Penetration+ Bulletins guys, amirite?
12 Jan 2016, 20:32 PM
#26
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Allied mortars would literally hard counter super heavy tanks then, those things can't dodge for shit. But be my guest, USF is the one true faction for me. #believe
Heavies don't have open tops though.
12 Jan 2016, 20:33 PM
#27
Posts: 21
Strongly disagree with your idea.
Lets start to count the open top vehicles in the game:
Allies:
M3
M5 HT
M5 HT USF version
M5 USF version with mortar
M8 Greyhound
M10
Priest
Saxon
Wasp
M20
M36
Scott
Su-76
Total:13
Axis:
Sdfkz 250 HT
Sdfkz 250 HT with mortar
Sdkfz 251 Flak
Ostwind
Kubelwagon
Total:5.
Problem ?
Clearly the idea favor one side.
However, here's a suggestion than - > Any vehicle suffering turret lock OR engine damage AND is axis - > will be evacuated immediately.
Why? Because it will add a new elemnt of depth into the game. (Also happened IRL, when the a tiger was turret locked > and was evacuated shortly after.)
See the logic ?
No ?
Lets start to count the open top vehicles in the game:
Allies:
M3
M5 HT
M5 HT USF version
M5 USF version with mortar
M8 Greyhound
M10
Priest
Saxon
Wasp
M20
M36
Scott
Su-76
Total:13
Axis:
Sdfkz 250 HT
Sdfkz 250 HT with mortar
Sdkfz 251 Flak
Ostwind
Kubelwagon
Total:5.
Problem ?
Clearly the idea favor one side.
However, here's a suggestion than - > Any vehicle suffering turret lock OR engine damage AND is axis - > will be evacuated immediately.
Why? Because it will add a new elemnt of depth into the game. (Also happened IRL, when the a tiger was turret locked > and was evacuated shortly after.)
See the logic ?
No ?
12 Jan 2016, 20:38 PM
#28
Posts: 393
I support this idea, will add great immersion to the game. Maybe also let the 120mm mortar crewshock tanks that dont have an open top like tiger/kt/panther/p4 etc..
The only reason COH2 is still around, is because it's preserved by salt.
12 Jan 2016, 20:49 PM
#29
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
i suggest OP makes a mod with this feature and distributes it to his followers.
so everybody is happy
so everybody is happy
12 Jan 2016, 21:12 PM
#30
Posts: 1096
I think this would add a new and interesting dynamic to gameplay, and give mortars and other artillery more late game utility.
But wouldn't this just be a massive USF nerf?
Consider the amount of open topped units each faction has, USF clearly has the most.
Jackson
Priest
M10
m20 (?)
WC50
scott
still a cool idea but I think it would be very hard to balance.
12 Jan 2016, 21:12 PM
#31
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Can't we just make mortars hitting tanks with 100% penetration to make them useful?
I don't support this idea.
I don't support this idea.
12 Jan 2016, 21:23 PM
#32
Posts: 278
Yes, but all tanks should be abandoned when hit by mortars, not just the open tops. After all, a mortar round would be pretty hard to distinguish from a p47 rocket from inside, so the crew would probably run away just in case. Also, so long as we're at it we should implement random air supremacy/artillery shells throughout the game. To better capture the feeling of WWII. Oh and every penetrating shot should be a kill.
12 Jan 2016, 21:24 PM
#33
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
M5 HT USF version
M8 Greyhound
Saxon
Sdfkz 250 HT
The wot?
12 Jan 2016, 21:28 PM
#34
Posts: 348
Let's have a 30 munition ability hardcountering a 350 mp 125 Fuel tank.... ( In the case of grenades)
Let's have a 240 mp unit hard counter a 350mp 125 fuel tank...
Flame throwers I agree with but the ability for RNG mortars and Frag Grenades to instantly decrew a tank is stupid.
Let's have a 240 mp unit hard counter a 350mp 125 fuel tank...
Flame throwers I agree with but the ability for RNG mortars and Frag Grenades to instantly decrew a tank is stupid.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKlnjwzT1IruAZFb0EA-5pQMy channel where I watch games and get upset at them.
12 Jan 2016, 22:35 PM
#35
Posts: 403
FREE
ABANDONED
TANKS
ABANDONED
TANKS
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
12 Jan 2016, 22:54 PM
#36
Posts: 323 | Subs: 1
can some one make a mod i in which we can try this new mechanic?
12 Jan 2016, 23:07 PM
#37
Posts: 1248
I'm not seeing why we want to nerf Ostwinds.
hahahhahaa
12 Jan 2016, 23:08 PM
#38
Posts: 1248
I don't see it as adding whole new strategic level to the game, I see it as adding whole new RNG to the game that affects mostly allies, is unneeded and allows 240 mp units to counter 300+mp 100+fu units.
Unless your goal is to take a steamy dump on the balance, then its a bad idea.
Agreed. Ostwinds would become useless.
12 Jan 2016, 23:09 PM
#39
Posts: 1248
This idea is as bad as having planes crashing planes randomly crashing into the battlefield. Each fight tells a different story.
12 Jan 2016, 23:12 PM
#40
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
i thought we wanted to get rid of abandon.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
896 users are online:
896 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49101
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM