Posts: 175
It's absolutely not free unless you can get it with 0 MP 0Munitions and 0 fuel.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I get it when you say it's not expensive enough, but saying it's free is just like calling any other unit free, if you just ignore the cost.
The only 'free' things I can think of is UKF recon plane and Anvil lmgs.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 500
How much you pay additionally to normal teching costs to get that AA?
Oh, that is right, ZERO.
Therefore, its free.
Really simple concept.
Oh and anvil RE LMGs have a cost since last year. Keep up with the changes.
If you buy a car and get a bonus tire with it, did you get that tire for free?
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Except that it isn't. If you buy a Shreck upgrade, you get a shreck + cold immunity. Which of these two is for free?
If you buy a unit which has a vet 1 ability, and it has to be unlocked in a tier, is that for free? No. If Bazookas would cost 0 Munitions, would they be free? No they wouldn't, because you need to unlock them first.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 500
You're comparing apples to oranges.
Posts: 680
Posts: 175
Go into your university and ask a professor of economics or informatics what he thinks about this.
You buy a car, and to this car you get a tire. This tire is not free as you need to buy the car first. If the tire costs 100$, it would be the same as if the car would cost 100$ less.
The tire would be free if you could go to the guy, get the tire and return with the tire and everything else you had with you.
Posts: 721
Posts: 289
Posts: 2742
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Posts: 175
some people are really intent on nerfing axis and what about some of the allied units and abilites which are never talked about them huhh..
on topic the trucks cost manpower and fuel themselves so yeah you pay for it...
if they get tech upgrade then the there should no actual cost to trucks and the knee jerk hot fix increase in okw fuel tanks should be reverted and instead teching should be more expensive
Posts: 3
some people are really intent on nerfing axis and what about some of the allied units and abilites which are never talked about them huhh..on topic the trucks cost manpower and fuel themselves so yeah you pay for it...and its'a faction okw doesn't gets mg in their core or snipers or mortars,they don't get caches just like usf have crew repair and best medium tanks at expense of no heavy tanks...its a faction flavour...if they get tech upgrade then the there should no actual cost to trucks and the knee jerk hot fix increase in okw fuel tanks should be reverted and instead teching should be more expensive
Posts: 500
I was directing the comparison to the quoted sentence, you don't have a direct cost to unlock the flak (0 mp, 0 mun, 0 fuel). You undoubtedly have an indirect cost in the form of a requirement that has to be fulfilled (building the structure, or buying the car). If you won't call a product that has no direct cost but needs certain conditions to be fulfilled (indirect cost) free, I won't argue with you.
It feels silly to discuss the term "free" here when everybody knows what is referred, i.e. OKW getting powerful perks while having the same(fuel), or cheaper(mp) teching costs as other factions, so I won't play along.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 500
Please, don't feed them. It's their daily portion of food in the net.
Keep it away from them and they will slowly perish
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
 |
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
180 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
