It seems OP needs too...
Git Gud.
Why imo the use of L2P is not constructive.
- This thread is locked
7 Jan 2016, 12:05 PM
#81
Posts: 403
Major Conscript user.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
7 Jan 2016, 12:51 PM
#82
Posts: 301
...Second of all, balance thread is not supposed to be a competition...
Everything is competition.
I has to be.
Kozo.
...For conflict is the great teacher,
and pain... the perfect educator...
and pain... the perfect educator...
7 Jan 2016, 13:21 PM
#83
1 
Posts: 311
Some people seem to be using the "L2P" term very often is balance debates. Imo the term is rude and nonconstructive. [...] Imo "L2P" as response is currently overused and should avoided.
What if it is a objective fact that the most obvious answer to the most complains about the game balance is L2P?
7 Jan 2016, 13:22 PM
#84
1 Posts: 311
A balance issue remain exactly the same weather it is reported by a person ranked number 1 or person ranked number 1.000
I agree that the balance issue is exactly the same, because both players play the same game and can see same things. But the more skilled player probably knows how to counter a certain thing that the opponent uses, when the other less-skilled player doesn't necessary know that. The more skilled player can have an answer to that what the other player says is "OP".
If the more skilled player has a counter to a specific thing that the other player claims is "OP", is that thing then "OP"? My answer is no, because it is a L2P-thing then.
7 Jan 2016, 14:22 PM
#85
Posts: 677
Everything is competition.
I has to be.
Kozo.
That sound like a really sad way to live your life...bu then it is your life...
7 Jan 2016, 14:24 PM
#86
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
That sound like a really sad way to live your life...bu then it is your life...
You'll know when you'll be old enough to work and aren't living in china
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
7 Jan 2016, 14:27 PM
#87
Posts: 677
...
Sure, if the issue was actually real.
Now, completely hypothetically, if a low level player claimed that random thing that is fine since the first game over a decade ago, say, infantry crush is op and plethora of higher level players say its fine, then it doesn't mean there is any issue at all.
You know the difference?...
If that low level player claimed that crush infantry in a light tank like T-70 makes that unit O.P. he would actually be right because it would make T-70 O.P., and thus it is balance issue...
7 Jan 2016, 14:32 PM
#88
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
As I've said, even broken clock shows correct time twice a day.
Doesn't change the fact that its broken and wrong all the other time.
You're grasping at straws, really hard.
I believe "try-hard" is the correct word to use here in regards to you.
Doesn't change the fact that its broken and wrong all the other time.
You're grasping at straws, really hard.
I believe "try-hard" is the correct word to use here in regards to you.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
7 Jan 2016, 14:37 PM
#89
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Let's not feed him anymore guys...
7 Jan 2016, 14:50 PM
#90
Posts: 677
"If that low level player claimed that crush infantry in a light tank like T-70 makes that unit O.P. he would actually be right because it would make T-70 O.P., and thus it is balance issue..."
So are you actually agreeing that crashing infantry on a T-70 is balance issue or not?
PLS try to avoid getting personal...
As I've said, even broken clock shows correct time twice a day.
Doesn't change the fact that its broken and wrong all the other time.
You're grasping at straws, really hard.
I believe "try-hard" is the correct word to use here in regards to you.
So are you actually agreeing that crashing infantry on a T-70 is balance issue or not?
PLS try to avoid getting personal...
7 Jan 2016, 15:05 PM
#91
14 
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
A defamatory post has been invised by a Moderator.
We seem to be wandering away from the thread topic
@ OP: if you feel your thread has come to the end of its useful life, you can always ask a Moderator to lock it.
We seem to be wandering away from the thread topic
@ OP: if you feel your thread has come to the end of its useful life, you can always ask a Moderator to lock it.
7 Jan 2016, 15:05 PM
#92
Posts: 301
That sound like a really sad way to live your life...bu then it is your life...
I do not see any sadness seeing tests in everything. I am quite surprised you do.
Dont be afraid to loose.
Kozo.
...For conflict is the great teacher,
and pain... the perfect educator...
and pain... the perfect educator...
7 Jan 2016, 19:05 PM
#93
Posts: 238
First of all, this is not America
Second of all, balance thread is not supposed to be a competition, it a place where someone can give his opinion on how this game can be improved
Third, is breaking the law in order to win the "competition" encouraged in America ? because according to forum rules "L2P" is discouraged.
PLS read the forum rules before posting on this issue. Thanks
You must lose a lot of games...
7 Jan 2016, 20:06 PM
#94
14 Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
You must lose a lot of games...
This has has nothing at all to do with the BM usage of 'L2P'.
For those who have not clicked, we do not run the forum so you can all converse in textspeak.
Posit: you are sitting round a NA bar... discussing COH2... is one of you really going to say "L2P". Of course not. You will sound moronic.
Please use these forums to discuss intelligibly and politely. We fully realise you are not all going to agree with each other, but use of "L2P" or "Noobs" is derisory, lazy and inflammatory.
Please try to up your game when you post here and at least address each other in reasonably respectful ways
/locked
.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
70 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1259
Board Info
713 users are online:
1 member and 712 guests
dola789ski
dola789ski
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49857
Welcome our newest member, dola789ski
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, dola789ski
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM