50 range tigers and axis AT options.
schrecks being extremely effective against all soviet armor, coincidentally, most soviet anti armour options are actually armored which are countered by schrecks which soviets have no considerable equivalent.
stugs are mobile AT guns that are very effective against is2. granted soviet got su85, but thats a different tier which actually costs more to tech to and buy it than a stug. a better comparison is su76, which is an excellent support unit, if not for schrecks.
tigers having 50 range means is2 will get hit 1st especially when played defensively, it also means is2 can be kited.
so it really boils down to what the is2 has to face. there is just so much more effective anti armor threats that axis can field to counter is2.
IS 2 problem
24 Dec 2015, 00:51 AM
#61
Posts: 647
24 Dec 2015, 00:55 AM
#62
Posts: 830
the is2 in the game already use the is2 1944 model.
It doesn't have the frontal pike. The latter 1944 model, there were three if I am correct, had the pike like the IS3 had.
24 Dec 2015, 01:25 AM
#63
Posts: 1930
It doesn't have the frontal pike. The latter 1944 model, there were three if I am correct, had the pike like the IS3 had.
late is2 use a single flat plate for its glacis plate instead of two section plate on the early is2. IS doesn't get the pike until the is3
24 Dec 2015, 02:19 AM
#64
Posts: 354
"Nose" of IS-2 1943.
"Nose" of IS-2 1944, like in game.
"Nose" of IS-2 1944, like in game.
24 Dec 2015, 02:32 AM
#65
Posts: 830
late is2 use a single flat plate for its glacis plate instead of two section plate on the early is2. IS doesn't get the pike until the is3
Oh my bad, thank you for this information my friend!
24 Dec 2015, 05:27 AM
#66
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
1) Vet 1 IS-2 absolutly useless for heavy tank.
2) Tiger have they range buff. IS-2 his direct opponent of count this game, got nothing. Why?
2) Tiger have they range buff. IS-2 his direct opponent of count this game, got nothing. Why?
If you quote me, quote the entire text. Anything else is equal to a lie.
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none
24 Dec 2015, 05:43 AM
#67
1 
Posts: 1276
Adjust is2 accuracy / scatter. Pen is fine. Adjust its base range and vet range to tiger I
24 Dec 2015, 05:53 AM
#68
Posts: 2070
"Nose" of IS-2 1943.
"Nose" of IS-2 1944, like in game.
nice pics. great looking tank
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
24 Dec 2015, 10:40 AM
#69
Posts: 281
I think the IS-2 just need a range increase base like the tiger, and a vet 2 range buff +5 just like the tiger. And of course a vet ability that isn't bad.
24 Dec 2015, 11:41 AM
#70
Posts: 1217
Lie that IS-2 AP ammunition not "penetrating" the King Tigers or Panthers.
24 Dec 2015, 13:28 PM
#71
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Adjust is2 accuracy / scatter. Pen is fine. Adjust its base range and vet range to tiger I
It seems that the community is shown unity in this matter
I said it could bounce off with the AP ammunition "at times".
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none
24 Dec 2015, 14:25 PM
#72
Posts: 1217
24 Dec 2015, 14:49 PM
#73
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Finish on this. I think I too react to all this.
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none
24 Dec 2015, 16:05 PM
#74
Posts: 1063
IMHO, the real problem with IS-2 is its useless Vet1 and its accuracy vs inf, the rest is fine. But what was Relic's reason when they buffed Tiger's range?
24 Dec 2015, 16:52 PM
#75
Posts: 954
Rework vet 1 for all soviet tanks, increase accuracy for IS-2, and adds some deflection damage for its 122mm gun, I mean 122mm gun got to have some awesome impact even without a armor penetrating!
and T-34/85 for non-doc.......
and T-34/85 for non-doc.......
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
24 Dec 2015, 17:40 PM
#76
Posts: 500
IMHO, the real problem with IS-2 is its useless Vet1 and its accuracy vs inf, the rest is fine. But what was Relic's reason when they buffed Tiger's range?
Because the Tiger was supposed to be kind of an allrounder, but ended up as a tank that was just bad at everything. It was slow, expensive, short sighted and fragile. It is supposed to be a vulnerable but hard-hitting tank.
24 Dec 2015, 17:48 PM
#77
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
It's scatter really strange, it lands behind enemy infantry more than half of the time.
24 Dec 2015, 18:04 PM
#78
Posts: 424 | Subs: 2
I don't think a range buff is necessary for IS-2 considering it has a high frontal armor compared to the Tiger. Just give it a slight accuracy bonus and if that's too good give it somewhat less aoe as a trade off.
24 Dec 2015, 19:03 PM
#79
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Rework vet 1 for all soviet tanks, increase accuracy for IS-2, and adds some deflection damage for its 122mm gun, I mean 122mm gun got to have some awesome impact even without a armor penetrating!
and T-34/85 for non-doc.......
So you really think that would be balanced? I would bet 100$ that soviets would be fotm with this change
24 Dec 2015, 20:39 PM
#80
Posts: 204
Just increase the accuracy on the gun and we are good. Either that or lower down the reload time.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
66 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.549203.730+3
- 2.830222.789+36
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.916404.694-1
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.305114.728+1
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.8520.810+7
- 10.14758.717+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1222
Board Info
647 users are online:
647 guests
1 post in the last 24h
16 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
16 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48909
Welcome our newest member, rudyegill
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, rudyegill
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM