t34 76 now useless
Posts: 5279
utter TRASH unless spammed or used with support
at 80fuel they are damn cheap (and stat wise pretty cost effective considering they can fight and win vs the ost p4) BUT at 10 pop cap and 300 manpower
as for support... I feel if the su85 was a worthwhile end tier TD (instead of an su76+) the t34 would really shine
Posts: 1484
Posts: 503
Love it Cancershrek
altough the name implies its the schreck (bane/fright) of cancer. so you basically called all allied tanks cancerous
Posts: 2470
altough the name implies its the schreck (bane/fright) of cancer. so you basically called all allied tanks cancerous
shrek is love, schreck is life, shrek is cancer.
Posts: 1384
Trading engine damage for stun is not a good trade. It should have a chance to inflict crits or stun + 320 damage or so.
It also deals guaranteed damage w/ high penetration, which can allow you to instakill vehicles with low health remaining without the risk of missing/not penetrating. It's also good to use when your t34 is going to die FOR SURE and you can give your opponent a final "fuck you".
It's a situationally effective ability. Could probably use some buffs (less negative effects for the t-34 would be nice) but it's not a bad ability.
Posts: 1216
That or make it doctrinal 2x call in as a cheaper but weaker alternative to non-doc '85.
Posts: 28
Posts: 392
It also deals guaranteed damage w/ high penetration, which can allow you to instakill vehicles with low health remaining without the risk of missing/not penetrating. It's also good to use when your t34 is going to die FOR SURE and you can give your opponent a final "fuck you".
It's a situationally effective ability. Could probably use some buffs (less negative effects for the t-34 would be nice) but it's not a bad ability.
Every time I tried to use ram to finish tanks it always backfired doing little damage.
It's easy to say on paper it's useful but the truth is it's a shitty ability with little to no use and damaging yourself more then the enemy in the process.
Posts: 114
t34/76 on it's own is ridiculously bad, why couldn't they just give it more health or armour? it's not like the thing can kill much aside from infantry on it's own.
Posts: 452 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
T34-76 needs some small buffs to make it attractive.
Posts: 452 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1484
another thing, when a t34 is out on the field and you get struck by a panzershreck since they are on every volk squad, you immediately cant risk it being on the field anymore and now need to repair it. because its so shitty to begin with, if you go into battle with 3/4 health then its even more worthless than it already is lol.
Sums up the argument plus T-70 is way more efficient in MP bleeds.
Posts: 2470
the t34/76 is so weak, and in tier 4 it costs way too much to tech to it, by then, your opponent has something much better.
because 34/76s will damage med and above tanks whereas 6 t-70s will do nothing to a V. that's pretty much the only reason.
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29
because 34/76s will damage med and above tanks whereas 6 t-70s will do nothing to a V. that's pretty much the only reason.
Wrong
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2470
Wrong
i'll admit i'm surprised but i find that a poor example for a serious argument. the V micro was non-existent while the t-70 micro was excellent and mark target was involved. also, 34/76s would have done much better in that same situation.
Posts: 301
Posts: 54
Livestreams
11 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Howden
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM