t34 76 now useless
3 Jan 2016, 01:47 AM
#121
Posts: 513
75 fuel 200 manpower, spammable shit medium, good fun.
3 Jan 2016, 03:07 AM
#122
Posts: 647
If you nerf the rear armor too much you might see some BS kills, since i have managed to hit a enemy tank in its rear armor by firing at its frontal armor with a 45mm AT gun from max range (the shot landed under the tank and resulted with a rear armor hit)
i see its a lesser of 2 evils.
i would rather take a better utility for medium tanks vs complete waste of resources.
3 Jan 2016, 04:40 AM
#123
Posts: 54
i don't think bringing back release ram that would 100% destroy main gun on target would be out of line with the current power creep
3 Jan 2016, 05:08 AM
#124
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
i don't think bringing back release ram that would 100% destroy main gun on target would be out of line with the current power creep
No.
If Ram was to be reworked, I'd make it like a tank-guided Target Weakpoint. Stun both tanks when it hits. Less stun if it does not penetrate. T-34 is always stunned for the maximum amount of time. T-34 is not utterly crippled, Ram is not a massive RNG cannon.
5 Jan 2016, 00:24 AM
#126
Posts: 118
A really cheap tool which fails to work is not worth it even having a lot of them.
An expensive tool which does the job really well is always worth it.
Guess which one is the t34. Hell, you can apply this to so many units in the game, like the kv1.
An expensive tool which does the job really well is always worth it.
Guess which one is the t34. Hell, you can apply this to so many units in the game, like the kv1.
6 Jan 2016, 16:58 PM
#127
Posts: 1484
I really liked the idea of replacing the T-34/76s with T-34/85s. With the commanders, we can have a call in of 2 T-34/76s to replace the 85s with appropriate costs and tech.
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
16 Jan 2016, 01:34 AM
#128
Posts: 54
the brit AEC is now better in almost every way when compared to the t-34 lmao
16 Jan 2016, 02:04 AM
#129
Posts: 1487
the brit AEC is now better in almost every way when compared to the t-34 lmao
God bless aec. Hope it will break game for axis too for balance.
| Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
16 Jan 2016, 08:38 AM
#130
6 
Posts: 33
T-34 is actually pretty decent for it's cost. Unfortunately is suffers pretty hard against the cancerschrek meta. If that ever gets fixed it, and other allied light and med vehicles may prove viable.
16 Jan 2016, 08:43 AM
#131
Posts: 4
Its only 80 fuel you can blob them support them with with SU85s.Just because its weak against its counterparts doesnt mean its useless
17 Jan 2016, 21:53 PM
#132
Posts: 392
Its only 80 fuel you can blob them support them with with SU85s.Just because its weak against its counterparts doesnt mean its useless
And where will you find the manpower and fuel to build a "blob" of t34s and also build su85s?
I can understand a realistic theory but yours is a fantasy that can never happen in your average game
17 Jan 2016, 23:38 PM
#133
Posts: 622
i think it should give a 120 MU upgrade to upgrade it T34-85, SU have tons MU anyway. and give commander T34-85 something else maybe IS-85/KV-85
18 Jan 2016, 01:00 AM
#134
Posts: 1954
I really liked the idea of replacing the T-34/76s with T-34/85s. With the commanders, we can have a call in of 2 T-34/76s to replace the 85s with appropriate costs and tech.
THIS
It would go a long ways towards fixing 4v4's without upsetting 1v1's too much (as Soviets seem pretty strong in 1v1)
It would also make Guard Motor more interesting if the call-in was a vet 3 T34 ace (or possibly a pair of them).
The current cost of t34's seems fine, but the pop-cap is too much at 10.
18 Jan 2016, 08:30 AM
#135
Posts: 353
T-34/76 Now performance like Tier 3.5 Tank
Way?
buff Performance compare other tank
or Side upgrade in Tier 3 for unlock it ?
Way?
buff Performance compare other tank
or Side upgrade in Tier 3 for unlock it ?
18 Jan 2016, 08:36 AM
#136
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
T-34/76 Now performance like Tier 3.5 Tank
Way?
buff Performance compare other tank
or Side upgrade in Tier 3 for unlock it ?
Soviet T4=all other armies T3.
So if anything, its T2,5 tank, just like rest of soviet T3.
But it doesn't need much when it comes to performance.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
18 Jan 2016, 10:44 AM
#137
Posts: 353
Oh I see
wait ESL season end
and watch Relic Reaction by update patch
wait ESL season end
and watch Relic Reaction by update patch
18 Jan 2016, 10:46 AM
#138
Posts: 1217
The T-34/76 should arrive earlier. There is simply no reason for it to get out so late. Noone is going to build it, if it arrives the time German mediums hit the field. It should be put into T3. The T-34/85 would still require T4.
Further the cost should be a tad lower. As mentioned 200mp, 75 fuel sounds interesting. If that´s too much of a buff, then only apply one change.
Buffing the performance of the unit is boring. We don´t need another P4, Sherman, Crommwell clone. The early version of the T-34 should be weak but spammable and a loss should barely hurt you.
Further the cost should be a tad lower. As mentioned 200mp, 75 fuel sounds interesting. If that´s too much of a buff, then only apply one change.
Buffing the performance of the unit is boring. We don´t need another P4, Sherman, Crommwell clone. The early version of the T-34 should be weak but spammable and a loss should barely hurt you.
18 Jan 2016, 11:32 AM
#139
Posts: 248
T-34 is actually pretty decent for it's cost. Unfortunately is suffers pretty hard against the cancerschrek meta. If that ever gets fixed it, and other allied light and med vehicles may prove viable.
Cancerschrek
28 Jan 2016, 03:20 AM
#140
Posts: 54
seriously why does the /76 have the performance of a pre-buff AEC? for its place in the tech tree, it needs love and badly.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
36 | ||
 |
|
|
163 | ||
 |
|
|
48 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
664 users are online:
664 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM