In late game SU suffers from being unable to mass its tanks. T-34 needs to cost less manpower if its going to be garbage.
You can't mass it anyway without killing off your infantry because of how high the pop costs were changed to be in CoH2.
Posts: 132
In late game SU suffers from being unable to mass its tanks. T-34 needs to cost less manpower if its going to be garbage.
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Yes. You just have to do a bit more flanking with the t3476.
Which is fine because losing one hurts a lot less.
T34 is really good vs USF
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
T34 is really good vs USF
Posts: 142
Unfortunately, any other medium tank copes with this task much better.
Sorry, but I do not think that the loss unit for 300 mp (and 80 fuel) is easy loss. Especially considering need build three of the four you most expensive tier buildings. It's just not worth it.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Nah. Zooks and USF AT gun are amazing vs T-34
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Problem is, you don't have them as Soviet , except for T-34/85 which is a doctrine unit.
st="465392"]You have to build all those tiers anyways.
Posts: 142
Why? As Soviet you have call-in.
Сall-in. They can replace T4 in one degree or another.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Of course, no need for T-34/76 if you have T-34/85, IS-2, KV-8, Guards, Shocks etc etc.
But sometimes I just want to play Commanders without call-in .
Posts: 1487
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
In that case, you must play as OKW
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
In last time then i play OKW...
Posts: 366
Posts: 54
Posts: 51
Posts: 174
Yea, I find it really funny that as SU or USF I need to think which doctrine I need and the choice is crucial, while as OKW I foten forget about doctrines since I don't need that much but I realize I did not pick any it's more like "I don't need this, I don't need this, I don't need this" opoosite to OST and Allies "I need this"
Posts: 1355
Yea, I find it really funny that as SU or USF I need to think which doctrine I need and the choice is crucial, while as OKW I foten forget about doctrines since I don't need that much but I realize I did not pick any it's more like "I don't need this, I don't need this, I don't need this" opoosite to OST and Allies "I need this"
Posts: 647
Posts: 587
reducing rear armour of heavy tanks will go a long way.
i would prefer its current price, increased AOE for AI and with 100% pen on rear hits, it can actually threaten and destroy heavies with a good flank.
Posts: 1930
T34 is really good vs USF
86 | |||||
47 | |||||
41 | |||||
29 | |||||
26 | |||||
13 | |||||
579 | |||||
53 | |||||
17 | |||||
3 |