Login

russian armor

Weak Ostwind

11 Dec 2015, 22:35 PM
#61
avatar of nodickwilliams

Posts: 230

Permanently Banned
Ostwind is lucky to kill 2 models after 2 bursts. Its good vs squads that run through white phosphorus I guess.

Increase rate of fire by 25% to be more consistent.
12 Dec 2015, 11:47 AM
#62
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164



what does that make the centaur, one of the slowest unit in the game?



You mean the unit that didnt have its mobility or price changed, yet used to get rushed and ended games immediately? And if mobility is survivability, it's weird how everybody complains about how unkillable KT and all the other supers are.

So to answer your question: it makes the "useless" centaur still better than the ostwind.
12 Dec 2015, 11:50 AM
#63
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Dec 2015, 11:47 AMcr4wler


You mean the unit that didnt have its mobility or price changed, yet used to get rushed and ended games immediately? And if mobility is survivability, it's weird how everybody complains about how unkillable KT and all the other supers are.

So to answer your question: it makes the "useless" centaur still better than the ostwind.


You might want to update your game to the latest patch, the one when centaur isn't like that and no one rushes it.

Talking about balance that doesn't even exist and trying to make it into an argument is pointless.

You would make just as much of a point if you've suddenly started talking about dinosaurs impact on our current life.
12 Dec 2015, 11:50 AM
#64
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

It's so "useless", that during last year it was a game changer many many times with scavange doctrine.
12 Dec 2015, 12:11 PM
#65
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Dec 2015, 11:50 AMKatitof


You might want to update your game to the latest patch, the one when centaur isn't like that and no one rushes it.

Talking about balance that doesn't even exist and trying to make it into an argument is pointless.

You would make just as much of a point if you've suddenly started talking about dinosaurs impact on our current life.


Ignoring all points only to cherrypick the one "weak" argument...

First off, centaur survivability never changed. Since it was OP before, its survivability was a non-issue quite obviously. After the nerf it's still better than the ostwind. Yet ostwind is "fine" but centaur "useless". Because survivability. Which was not changed and wasn't an issue earlier. Yep makes sense.

Also, you might want to start reading the posts you're replying to. And the ones they're replying to. See the whole picture for yourself... then i won't have to explain to you why you're wrong all the time ;-)

It's so "useless", that during last year it was a game changer many many times with scavange doctrine.


Dont play OKW... what was the problem and how did it get fixed? if the answer to the second part of the question is not "ostwind was nerfed", then the root of the problem obviously had nothing to do with the ostwind.

12 Dec 2015, 12:38 PM
#66
avatar of Junaid

Posts: 509

Agreed it needs a small performance increase.

I personally think it should also use an accuracy based attack. Instead of AoE/Scatter. Cause right now its damage output seems sort of inconsistent. Also: is it possible for the AoE dmg to 'miss'?

When I see that thing and centaur; the disparity is quite big. Not big enough for 40mp cost difference imo.
12 Dec 2015, 18:16 PM
#67
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

But you are able to make the MG suppress using some bulletins :bananadance:

PD: what's the performance of centaur vs 2/3 units bunch up together against the Ostwind on the same situation ?
12 Dec 2015, 18:39 PM
#68
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

So I made a tests.

Centaur and Ostwind vs Volks/Rifles and mid/long and close range.

Centaur vs 1 Volks at mid/long - 15s.
Ostwind vs 1 Rifle at mid/long - 19s.

Centaur vs 3 Volks at mid/long - 69s (tho this should be a bit higher, becasue I had to move Centaur aa bit close because it was shooting the ground :D Ostwind was not shooting the ground from the same place. Dem this shit Ostwind!)
Ostwind vs 3 RF at mid/long - 80s.

Centaur vs 3 Volks at close - 40s.
Ostwind vs 3 RF at close - 46s.

Now, tell me, how Ostwind is UP? Sure, it kills a bit slower than Centaur but it has better survability (mobility).
Or maybe you want to bring it in line with Centaur for those X seconds in exchange for shitty mobility? :snfPeter:
12 Dec 2015, 18:47 PM
#69
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

So I made a tests.

Centaur and Ostwind vs Volks/Rifles and mid/long and close range.

Centaur vs 1 Volks at mid/long - 15s.
Ostwind vs 1 Rifle at mid/long - 19s.

Centaur vs 3 Volks at mid/long - 69s (tho this should be a bit higher, becasue I had to move Centaur aa bit close because it was shooting the ground :D Ostwind was not shooting the ground from the same place. Dem this shit Ostwind!)
Ostwind vs 3 RF at mid/long - 80s.

Centaur vs 3 Volks at close - 40s.
Ostwind vs 3 RF at close - 46s.

Now, tell me, how Ostwind is UP? Sure, it kills a bit slower than Centaur but it has better survability (mobility).
Or maybe you want to bring it in line with Centaur for those X seconds in exchange for shitty mobility? :snfPeter:

Thx for some hard Data, can you swap volks with grens? Just curious how much the 4 model squad changes the killIng time
12 Dec 2015, 19:06 PM
#70
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2


Thx for some hard Data, can you swap volks with grens? Just curious how much the 4 model squad changes the killIng time


Same environment but vs IS and Grens.

Centaur: 12s/52s/36s
Ostwind: 20s/67s/44s

Of course it's just "more or less" casue it all depends on map, where are you shooting, cover, terrain etc.
12 Dec 2015, 23:24 PM
#71
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

thanks Australian.


First off, centaur survivability never changed. Since it was OP before, its survivability was a non-issue quite obviously. After the nerf it's still better than the ostwind. Yet ostwind is "fine" but centaur "useless". Because survivability. Which was not changed and wasn't an issue earlier. Yep makes sense.


there's a saying "the best defensive is a good offense". centaur survivability was not an issue previously because the tank was wiping infantry in seconds. The jackson is an extreme case of where a unit's firepower and mobility excuse its fragility.
12 Dec 2015, 23:29 PM
#72
avatar of Pablonano

Posts: 297

Its both good AI and reliable anti-light armor, its a good for everything - master of nothing
12 Dec 2015, 23:36 PM
#73
avatar of Carlos Danger

Posts: 362

It probably needs a buff. Its anti-infantry capabilities are only marginally better than a Panzer IV. For a dedicated anti-infantry vehicle, that's not enough.

Not a huge buff mind you.
12 Dec 2015, 23:54 PM
#74
avatar of Jespe

Posts: 190



Same environment but vs IS and Grens.

Centaur: 12s/52s/36s
Ostwind: 20s/67s/44s

Of course it's just "more or less" casue it all depends on map, where are you shooting, cover, terrain etc.


Dear god weapon team down before it can escape when Centaur shoots it.
12 Dec 2015, 23:59 PM
#76
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Dec 2015, 23:54 PMJespe


Dear god weapon team down before it can escape when Centaur shoots it.

Yes, you usually place your team weapons in the open without cover in front of your opponent tanks.
13 Dec 2015, 00:45 AM
#77
avatar of nodickwilliams

Posts: 230

Permanently Banned
Katitof fighting tooth and nail to make sure we know ostwind is completely fine and better than the centaur. Go figure.
13 Dec 2015, 08:58 AM
#78
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164

thanks Australian.


there's a saying "the best defensive is a good offense". centaur survivability was not an issue previously because the tank was wiping infantry in seconds. The jackson is an extreme case of where a unit's firepower and mobility excuse its fragility.


So what you're saying is that ostwind has a shitty defense (because shitty offense)?
Dude you flip-flop more than politicians :-)

Just experiment with the ostwind in cheatmod... or try building it in a automatch game. It's not a very good unit. Not at its intended role (AI) nor at anything else apart from maybe AA (and i'd argue that even here the centaur is far superior)

13 Dec 2015, 11:34 AM
#79
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Dec 2015, 08:58 AMcr4wler


So what you're saying is that ostwind has a shitty defense (because shitty offense)?
Dude you flip-flop more than politicians :-)

Just experiment with the ostwind in cheatmod... or try building it in a automatch game. It's not a very good unit. Not at its intended role (AI) nor at anything else apart from maybe AA (and i'd argue that even here the centaur is far superior)



killing squad 8-4 seconds slower than centuar = shitty offense? that's barely one reload circle for a panther.
13 Dec 2015, 11:58 AM
#80
avatar of bert69

Posts: 150

Ostwind weak 4Head
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

482 users are online: 482 guests
0 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48953
Welcome our newest member, woodkayla1297
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM