T34-76 Veterancy

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 1248

YERRRRR MAUM Kappa Also its a cheap meatshield sooooo....

Posts: 721

only ukf tanks and infy can vet fast dont ya know..??

/s

Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

30 Nov 2015, 18:56 PM__deleted__

You do realize how much work...

Pfff. I write this Nabarxos, he think vet requirements T-34-76 is OK. I disagreed with him. Your word as an example, that you T-34-76 killed a lot of things and still have not received 3 vet.

Posts: 380

Why do we need t3476, when we have t70. It's better in killing infantry. So t3476 is rubbish now, better call in t70 to do its job. Su85 is rubbish, because we have su76, that far more better. So, to my mind, t3476, su85 need some rework or buff.

Posts: 1653

1 Dec 2015, 03:54 AMWhat Doth Life?!

Yeah, but I don't always want a flamethrower on my engineer.

Of course you always want to have a flamer on your engi Kappa Sweep the mines with the squad

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

The T34/76 actually has some pretty good Vet abilities. The tank is mostly fine other than that it costs too much MP for its performance. It either needs to be cheaper in MP (~260-275) or its needs to get a buff to its MGs so it is actually a threat to infantry without relying on the whims of the RNG gods or the need to crush.

Posts: 498

1 Dec 2015, 07:24 AMGluhoman

Why do we need t3476, when we have t70. It's better in killing infantry. So t3476 is rubbish now, better call in t70 to do its job. Su85 is rubbish, because we have su76, that far more better. So, to my mind, t3476, su85 need some rework or buff.

Su85 is not rubbish in any way, it doesn't have as many uses as a su76 (barrage) and they're not worth to spam, 2 su85s will do the same job as 3-4 su76 as anti tank against anything heavier than a pzIV,

T34 really needs to be looked at, right now it has no role in the game, can't kill tank or inf reliably and is only half decent as a ramming tool to be used against Tigers while you FAB bomb them

www.twitch.tv/rawv1
"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the win
In game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT

Multi Quote

Posts: 647

needs that bugged rof back and reduced scatter/aoe to make it an ai tank worth its price. vet requirements and boost dont matter when the base unit comes so late and has horrendous performance.

Posts: 1216

I personally think Ram should be reworked so it's basically vet0 Blitzkrieg but will collide with any enemy vehicle like how Ram works as-is, and/or collides with things like breakable walls or trees.

This way, their low HP is compensated by the ability to move faster when its used, as well as retaining the Ram feature.
Sure it's more or less a ripoff of Blitzkrieg, but besides the fact that OKW also rips off Blitzkrieg, this is slightly different in that it still overheats engine, liable to hitting the wrong vehicle, shorter duration, and tank's lower health and AT performance compared to panzer4. SO what you have is a tactical ability to outmanouver stronger Axis tanks (compared to how Ram works how, it's a direct charging attack that disables weapons AND breaks the vehicle, or stuns the vehicle if it misses), preferably by using more than one T-34 at a time.

Posts: 2470

34/76s can be effective in team games as long as you've got 3-4 on the field and you ram anything that your ally might be able to finish off and anything that could kill your tank.

they're still shit and i'm still not convinced they're cost effective though.

3 Dec 2015, 08:04 AMnee

I personally think Ram should be reworked so it's basically vet0 Blitzkrieg but will collide with any enemy vehicle like how Ram works as-is, and/or collides with things like breakable walls or trees.

This way, their low HP [...]

they have standard hp.