SEXTON
All related threads
Arclyte : http://www.coh2.org/topic/41457/the-sexton-sucks
SpaceHamster : http://www.coh2.org/topic/43619/sexton-underperforming-for-cost
bingo12345 : http://www.coh2.org/topic/43672/ukf-sexton-stats-comparison-buff-needed
http://www.coh2.org/topic/44177/relic-please-let-me-teach-simple-math
http://www.coh2.org/topic/44536/heavy-artillery-weird-damage-to-garrisoned
Dullahan : http://www.coh2.org/topic/43429/the-valentine-and-the-sexton
Nobody says Okay for Sexton. Everybody says it needs adjustment.
Relic. Check the opinions on the community to make viable things.
I'm surprised they didn't buff trash Sexton.
19 Nov 2015, 09:10 AM
#1
Posts: 304
19 Nov 2015, 09:13 AM
#2
Posts: 304
I made a mistake i didn't make "Sexton is okay" poll.
admin can you make "Sexton is okay" poll"?
admin can you make "Sexton is okay" poll"?
19 Nov 2015, 11:27 AM
#3
Posts: 482
They will lose their jobs if they fix everything in one patch. Remember they said they have a 5 year plan? lol...
 | Playercard of ATOUBA | |||||||
|
19 Nov 2015, 11:34 AM
#4
Posts: 304
They will lose their jobs if they fix everything in one patch. Remember they said they have a 5 year plan? lol...
my god... capitalism broken! need fix.
19 Nov 2015, 11:46 AM
#5
4 Posts: 474
I actually made a post where I pointed out the buffs sexton needs but that disappeared into the abyss for some reason.
I can only say to that:
I can only say to that:
19 Nov 2015, 13:17 PM
#6
Posts: 98
The Sexton in its current state is a unit that is so bad that calling it in actually puts you at a disadvantage from the wasted resources, population and upkeep.
You woulnd't even get this unit if you were vastly ahead of your opponent and just wanted to troll them.
You woulnd't even get this unit if you were vastly ahead of your opponent and just wanted to troll them.
Please bear in mind that I only play team game modes.
19 Nov 2015, 13:35 PM
#7
Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1
@OP added "Sexton is currently fine" per your request.
The internal battery has run dry, the game can now be played. However, clock based events will no longer occur.
19 Nov 2015, 14:24 PM
#8
Posts: 830
Please no more major buffs for anything 
19 Nov 2015, 19:17 PM
#9
Posts: 304
@OP added "Sexton is currently fine" per your request.
Thanks for adding okay poll. admin.
19 Nov 2015, 19:42 PM
#10
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
voted for buff, but carefully..having a good non doc base howitzer can be abusive as fuck
19 Nov 2015, 20:14 PM
#11
4 
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
I once played a 1v1 against a guy who went arty commander. He starts shelling a position with a Sexton, and instead of moving around, I just knowingly moved my infantry blob through there. I remember raising an eyebrow at a lucky shell killing a Volkssquad.
I mean, I suppose it's not UTTER garbage, since there we have the proof it wiped at least one squad in the history of competitive 1v1s due to my stupidity.
I mean, I suppose it's not UTTER garbage, since there we have the proof it wiped at least one squad in the history of competitive 1v1s due to my stupidity.
19 Nov 2015, 20:39 PM
#12
1 
Posts: 2885
voted for buff, but carefully..having a good non doc base howitzer can be abusive as fuck
How is sexton a non-doc howie?
19 Nov 2015, 20:48 PM
#13
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
How is sexton a non-doc howie?
omg never mind, ive thought about the base arty from brits, both are in need of a buff my misstake
19 Nov 2015, 20:50 PM
#14
Posts: 106
It needs a buff.
Go on, dare UKF players to choose Artillery Commander, especially in 1v1 and 2v2.
Hey, less Churchill call-ins. Win-win.
Go on, dare UKF players to choose Artillery Commander, especially in 1v1 and 2v2.
Hey, less Churchill call-ins. Win-win.
19 Nov 2015, 21:13 PM
#15
Posts: 232
What confuses me is that the whole doctrine is plainly bad, yet the only change it gets is to make the valentine a 6CP call in instead of 8CP. Even then I'm convinced it will be as pointless at 6CP as it is at 8.
There hasn't even been a comment on if the line of sight change in the last patch was intended or not.
There hasn't even been a comment on if the line of sight change in the last patch was intended or not.
19 Nov 2015, 21:55 PM
#16
Posts: 239
I think the devs are hesitant to buff the Sexton at the moment due to the dominance of certain faction's indirect fire within the current meta. At the very least the Sexton can certainly do with an increase to range; it's very silly that it has to get so close to its target to let off a barrage unlike any other of its counterparts.
| Playercard of Dadical | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2015, 02:09 AM
#17
Posts: 270 | Subs: 1
Artillery Regiment Valentine spam will become the new meta in the December patch 
1 Dec 2015, 02:42 AM
#18
Posts: 1026
Sexton and base howis need a radius increase on their shells.
Sexton needs a range increase too.
Sexton needs a range increase too.
1 Dec 2015, 03:04 AM
#19
Posts: 1384
I'd be happy if it had a bit shorter of a cooldown, but I dunno. When used with the valentine it can fire pretty frequently and it can dish out a ton of damage.
I'd love to use it more to really get a feel for it, but it's fucking impossible. By the time you can get 9 cp's and the resources to call out a valentine and a sexton, you're facing down medium tanks.
I'm not very quick to say things are unviable. I think it's a terrible word that people use to describe "hard to use", but jesus christ on a pickle I haven't been able to make royal artillery work at all in any semblance of a real game. I'm still trying to get it to click by focusing on playing a longer t2 and not even teching up to t3 but it's risky as hell to play Brits without proper armour. (It's possible, but I find it difficult)
Using the sexton on its own just seems like doing the doctrine wrong, it's meant to be used in synergy with the valentine. But getting both of them and then keeping the valentine alive to vet 1 is just UGHGHLA>kndcl.asnbf right now.
I'd love to use it more to really get a feel for it, but it's fucking impossible. By the time you can get 9 cp's and the resources to call out a valentine and a sexton, you're facing down medium tanks.
I'm not very quick to say things are unviable. I think it's a terrible word that people use to describe "hard to use", but jesus christ on a pickle I haven't been able to make royal artillery work at all in any semblance of a real game. I'm still trying to get it to click by focusing on playing a longer t2 and not even teching up to t3 but it's risky as hell to play Brits without proper armour. (It's possible, but I find it difficult)
Using the sexton on its own just seems like doing the doctrine wrong, it's meant to be used in synergy with the valentine. But getting both of them and then keeping the valentine alive to vet 1 is just UGHGHLA>kndcl.asnbf right now.
1 Dec 2015, 03:12 AM
#20
Posts: 1248
Brits dont need arty what kind of bs is that? 
2 users are browsing this thread:
2 guests
Livestreams
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
904 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
1023 users are online:
1023 guests
0 post in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
10 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49998
Welcome our newest member, nohu90forum
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, nohu90forum
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM