Login

russian armor

Hope for USF AT-Gun?

27 Nov 2015, 13:12 PM
#41
avatar of MoreLess3rd

Posts: 363



Meanwhile, 45mm atgun cries in corner.


Just test it Out

45mm in the 1st place,
USF ATG
Reken
Pak40
6 pounder
Ziss

B-)
27 Nov 2015, 13:24 PM
#42
avatar of mortiferum

Posts: 571

The main word is "Vetted" this shit is dying too fast and it is hard to handle it to late game.


Vetted Kubelwagon :D
28 Nov 2015, 04:31 AM
#43
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

i wud go for captain if the AT gun wasnt crap but instead i go for m20
28 Nov 2015, 08:26 AM
#44
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

Purpose of AT gun is to counter luchs and stug
28 Nov 2015, 09:32 AM
#45
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

Purpose of AT gun is to counter luchs and stug

lol wut thats all its good for? jesus H even a panzershreck, raketenwerfer and pak 40 could do that blindfolded...
28 Nov 2015, 09:41 AM
#46
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891


lol wut thats all its good for? jesus H even a panzershreck, raketenwerfer and pak 40 could do that blindfolded...


Using at gun on tanks is not optimal imo because of muni cost requirement, and axis indirect/ JLI and Falls decrew them like nothing

Buying at gun to deal with FHT or flaktrack makes no sense because Stuart, m20, and rifles with smoke can deal with these

Alternatives as usf to at gun, m10 spam, jacksons, winning game before you need them, are all better
28 Nov 2015, 13:29 PM
#47
avatar of Spin

Posts: 85

USF ATG needs to be upscaled a bit - it's great vs light and even most medium armour right now but it cannot touch heavy armour in a longer game. Increase cost of the AT gun and increase penetration. A faction with the worst late game anti-tank struggles against big tank pushes.

Other than that, at vet1 it's great.

Or as a complete alternative, give USF something that can reliably damage big tanks, even a commander with a 57mm (equivalent to 6 pounder).
28 Nov 2015, 13:43 PM
#48
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 21:34 PMAradan


Large team games are different from 1v1 and 2v2. In late game you meat 2-3 KT in the same moment. Your AT gun still bounce and KT one shots your guns.

All AT guns need cloak in green cover.


If we are talking 3v3 an 4v4 there is no need for usf to have at gun at all, brits and soviets can do this if players arent competent enough to use usf at guns to full potentiall. But on the other hand thanks to 70 range it should be the best at gun on open spaces that happen to exist only in team games. Will it bounce? Ofc, but other at guns wont even shoot at this range. Also dont tell me that all you have when kts arrive is one at gun :D

Also mind that even without ap shells it still has better pen than p4. And you use p4s to kill tanks, dont you?
28 Nov 2015, 14:22 PM
#49
avatar of JoeH

Posts: 88



If we are talking 3v3 an 4v4 there is no need for usf to have at gun at all, brits and soviets can do this if players arent competent enough to use usf at guns to full potentiall. But on the other hand thanks to 70 range it should be the best at gun on open spaces that happen to exist only in team games. Will it bounce? Ofc, but other at guns wont even shoot at this range. Also dont tell me that all you have when kts arrive is one at gun :D

Also mind that even without ap shells it still has better pen than p4. And you use p4s to kill tanks, dont you?


Was made clear that this guy does not even play Axis and just begs for buffs for allied units in every thread...
28 Nov 2015, 17:01 PM
#50
avatar of Foxbat

Posts: 30

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Nov 2015, 18:12 PMATCF
USF AT gun has the fastest fire-rate of all AT guns, what else does it need?


feels pretty weird to have the same unit historically performing pretty differently. Would it really kill the game for both to use the current 6pdr stats?
28 Nov 2015, 17:02 PM
#51
avatar of Foxbat

Posts: 30

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 17:01 PMFoxbat


feels pretty weird to have the same unit historically performing pretty differently. Would it really kill the game for both to use the current 6pdr stats? Just copy the unit to USF. Will take it over rate of fire and muni sin any day.
29 Nov 2015, 15:46 PM
#52
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 17:01 PMFoxbat


feels pretty weird to have the same unit historically performing pretty differently. Would it really kill the game for both to use the current 6pdr stats?


Personally I care more about factions having uniaue playstyles and tools than I do about accurate representation.

I feel like the 6lber was lazy as shit in comparison to how well the other AT guns are balanced.
29 Nov 2015, 18:30 PM
#53
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

I love stealing this AT gun as axis because it wrecks soviet and american tanks which it can pen reliably.
29 Nov 2015, 19:53 PM
#54
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Nov 2015, 18:30 PMTobis
I love stealing this AT gun as axis because it wrecks soviet and american tanks which it can pen reliably.

why the hell do axis do that when they have AT weapons better the than 57? it just doesn't make sense...
29 Nov 2015, 20:00 PM
#55
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Nov 2015, 18:30 PMTobis
I love stealing this AT gun as axis because it wrecks soviet and american tanks which it can pen reliably.


and ironically the same is true with the pak in the opposite direction. feels like the AT guns were given to the wrong factions.
29 Nov 2015, 20:01 PM
#56
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13


why the hell do axis do that when they have AT weapons better the than 57? it just doesn't make sense...


Because the 57mm shoots faster, has wider arc and doesn't need to deal with as high armour vaules when engaging the faster Allied armour? Oh, and its vet 1 ability. Oh, I forgot, having two ATGs is better than one.

And it makes for incentives to steal the other sides equipment, as Arby puts it. Soviets with a 6 man pak? Good luck clearing that.
29 Nov 2015, 20:22 PM
#57
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4


why the hell do axis do that when they have AT weapons better the than 57? it just doesn't make sense...


If it can pen all the shots the 57mm has the highest dps for any AT gun in the game. If you are playing against medium tanks like what USF and SOV field then you will almost guarantee penetration on every shot so it is much better than a pak40. On the flip side the pak 40 is better in allied hands because it can pen the heavy armor of axis tanks better. It's nice this way, it's always better to steal enemy equipment.
29 Nov 2015, 21:00 PM
#58
avatar of IA3 - HH

Posts: 289

usf dont need new AT gun, currently AT is good
29 Nov 2015, 21:08 PM
#59
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Nov 2015, 20:22 PMTobis


If it can pen all the shots the 57mm has the highest dps for any AT gun in the game. If you are playing against medium tanks like what USF and SOV field then you will almost guarantee penetration on every shot so it is much better than a pak40. On the flip side the pak 40 is better in allied hands because it can pen the heavy armor of axis tanks better. It's nice this way, it's always better to steal enemy equipment.

lol it wud be much better if allies were given AT weapons that were on par with the axis ones that way it will be a level playing field
29 Nov 2015, 21:11 PM
#60
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

i like it.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

986 users are online: 1 member and 985 guests
trainadapt
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM