Login

russian armor

Hope for USF AT-Gun?

29 Nov 2015, 21:28 PM
#61
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1



and ironically the same is true with the pak in the opposite direction. feels like the AT guns were given to the wrong factions.

The gun is always greater on the other side
29 Nov 2015, 22:17 PM
#62
avatar of GenObi

Posts: 556

i stop using that worthless gun a while back, now i just use Rear/zook swarm.
30 Nov 2015, 14:39 PM
#63
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Nov 2015, 21:28 PMVuther

The gun is always greater on the other side


Not really. For OKW is a matter of not having the tools (MGs or heavier at guns), but in the case of OH...

SU 82mm mortar
45mm AT gun
Zis gun
Maxim can arguably be better or not (also micro)
UKF AT gun (if we don't consider vet ability)


30 Nov 2015, 16:35 PM
#64
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1



Not really. For OKW is a matter of not having the tools (MGs or heavier at guns), but in the case of OH...

SU 82mm mortar
45mm AT gun
Zis gun
Maxim can arguably be better or not (also micro)
UKF AT gun (if we don't consider vet ability)



I wasn't being serious, I just wanted to paraphrase a cliche.
30 Nov 2015, 19:12 PM
#65
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7



Personally I care more about factions having uniaue playstyles and tools than I do about accurate representation.

I feel like the 6lber was lazy as shit in comparison to how well the other AT guns are balanced.



Zis = pak just to tell you that not only british at gun have almost identical stats of german

Also i think all at guns are unique.

Zis - barrage
Pak - stunshot
raketen - can be placed in building , can cloak , can retreat in exchange of 10 range
USA at gun - faster ROF , 70 range , low pen
British - sprint
30 Nov 2015, 23:42 PM
#66
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384




Zis = pak just to tell you that not only british at gun have almost identical stats of german

Also i think all at guns are unique.

Zis - barrage
Pak - stunshot
raketen - can be placed in building , can cloak , can retreat in exchange of 10 range
USA at gun - faster ROF , 70 range , low pen
British - sprint


Doesn't the Zis have lower rate of fire and penetration? And yeah I agree they're unique (except brit)

Unique abilities isn't enough imo. Imagine if all the infantry were the same but got different vet 1 bonuses. Plus sprint was just about the laziest fuxking thing they could have put on the 6lber.
1 Dec 2015, 01:49 AM
#67
avatar of Arclyte

Posts: 692

the way people are talking here, you'd think the 57mm was the best AT gun ever and you'd see multiple being built every game

Except it isn't, and you don't
1 Dec 2015, 02:10 AM
#68
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3

the way people are talking here, you'd think the 57mm was the best AT gun ever and you'd see multiple being built every game

Except it isn't, and you don't


I always bring them when playing usf.
1 Dec 2015, 02:38 AM
#69
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

the way people are talking here, you'd think the 57mm was the best AT gun ever and you'd see multiple being built every game

Except it isn't, and you don't


I mean you only need as much AT as you need. I personally like to have atleast one lying around when I play US.

Even if it is an underused unit, that doesn't mean it is underperforming.
1 Dec 2015, 15:24 PM
#70
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7



Doesn't the Zis have lower rate of fire and penetration? And yeah I agree they're unique (except brit)

Unique abilities isn't enough imo. Imagine if all the infantry were the same but got different vet 1 bonuses. Plus sprint was just about the laziest fuxking thing they could have put on the 6lber.


Sprint is one of strongest if not strongest.

YOu can pursue tank and give him finishing blow. You can run out of infantry puruing your AT gun, you can shot backup while your sniper will give luch critical shot , then shot and finish luchs.

Sprint is underudes but it does not mean UP
1 Dec 2015, 15:54 PM
#71
avatar of Blalord

Posts: 742 | Subs: 1

Are you forgeting that 6lber does have a +50% accuracy bonus against vehicule ? :)
1 Dec 2015, 15:59 PM
#72
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

I like USF AT gun.

Its pain in the ass to use AP ammo, but other then that its pretty decent gun if you have 2 or 3 around, especially at vet1.

For heavier units you have jacksons.
Problems arise only when you face JT/ele.
1 Dec 2015, 17:12 PM
#73
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384



Sprint is one of strongest if not strongest.


I just mean in terms of "Hey we copy pasted this ability from the maxim lol" lazy.

Not arguing it doesn't have a use, just that it's rather boring. I think they could have thought of something better.
1 Dec 2015, 17:18 PM
#74
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7



I just mean in terms of "Hey we copy pasted this ability from the maxim lol" lazy.

Not arguing it doesn't have a use, just that it's rather boring. I think they could have thought of something better.


Yes because maxim and AT gun are exactly the same units.

And what would you want for this ? Ability that allow tank to fire 10 second turbo and then dont fire half minute ? NO it would be Op because it can kill tank fast.

British are really different to Ostheer. they does not have snare , have different mines , sniper , centuar is no oswind and cromwell is not p4 , they have meatshield tank but does not have tiger type , they lack rocket arty but have emplacements etc. etc. etc.

Brits are different. If you make them more different it would create bigger balance issues
1 Dec 2015, 17:38 PM
#75
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384



Yes because maxim and AT gun are exactly the same units.

And what would you want for this ? Ability that allow tank to fire 10 second turbo and then dont fire half minute ? NO it would be Op because it can kill tank fast.

British are really different to Ostheer. they does not have snare , have different mines , sniper , centuar is no oswind and cromwell is not p4 , they have meatshield tank but does not have tiger type , they lack rocket arty but have emplacements etc. etc. etc.

Brits are different. If you make them more different it would create bigger balance issues


Are you retarded? I said the ability is copy pasted from the maxim. Which it is. The maxim is a weaker machine gun with a shorter set up time but smaller firing arc, an aggressive ability makes sense there. This is the sort of ability that would make sense on the doctrinal light AT gun soviets have. Being weaker, but more aggressive. It's out of place on a pak40 clone.

I would want something tied into hammer/anvil. With hammer it gets the vehicle tracking after hit that vehicles get, with anvil it gets increased range/vision in friendly territory. Like the vickers it wouldn't get a vet 1 active ability but instead each level of vet would provide a pretty big boon. (Maybe vet 3 could get a passive move speed increase?)

It just felt like a lazy choice of ability to me. The whole unit really feels like they had no unique ideas. Copy paste pak 40, give it sprint. Make it cheaper for some reason (?!) The rest of the faction is great and well designed but christ the 6lber is incredibly stale from a design POV.
1 Dec 2015, 18:30 PM
#76
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7



Are you retarded? I said the ability is copy pasted from the maxim. Which it is. The maxim is a weaker machine gun with a shorter set up time but smaller firing arc, an aggressive ability makes sense there. This is the sort of ability that would make sense on the doctrinal light AT gun soviets have. Being weaker, but more aggressive. It's out of place on a pak40 clone.

I would want something tied into hammer/anvil. With hammer it gets the vehicle tracking after hit that vehicles get, with anvil it gets increased range/vision in friendly territory. Like the vickers it wouldn't get a vet 1 active ability but instead each level of vet would provide a pretty big boon. (Maybe vet 3 could get a passive move speed increase?)

It just felt like a lazy choice of ability to me. The whole unit really feels like they had no unique ideas. Copy paste pak 40, give it sprint. Make it cheaper for some reason (?!) The rest of the faction is great and well designed but christ the 6lber is incredibly stale from a design POV.


Why you must be so ugly only because i told you that none At gun have sprint and it is once of best At gun abilities and it it there mainly because of lack of snare ?

On topic: USA at gun is actually good , it does its job decent - fast firing AT gun with capability to pen medium tanks reliaalbe - its job .It can also pen heavier tanks with use of munition , but once again you have Jacson for that. PLS we dont want to have pak with 70 range and fast ROF for 270 MP. If anything we should change then it is recieved accuracy to crew. They die like fleas - hovewer this is problem of all at gun crews except zis. I think it should go for AT guns. They are already near line of batlle and they cannot retreat (like mortars or mgs )
1 Dec 2015, 20:09 PM
#77
avatar of GhostTX

Posts: 315

Just change the AP to numbers of shells shot, like the next 5 shot will be APCR, not time based and I'll be happy.

I'd like that. Nothing more frustrating than spending the muni and only have it get one shot off before the tank backs out.
2 Dec 2015, 04:08 AM
#78
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384


I'd like that. Nothing more frustrating than spending the muni and only have it get one shot off before the tank backs out.


The entire point of such abilities is to use them at the perfect time to catch your opponent with it, and likewise the counterplay from your opponent is to back off when you pop it too early. It's like sex, don't blow your load too early or she'll run away! Or something like that anyway :P




Why you must be so ugly only because i told you that none At gun have sprint and it is once of best At gun abilities and it it there mainly because of lack of snare ?


We seem to be rubbing up against a language barrier or something then. I'm not talking about performance AT ALL, I agree with you that it's pretty good. The "retarded" comment was specifically in response to the "yes, the maxim and the 6lber are exactly the same unit" line you gave me which had absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying, which I further clarified earlier. It's just a boring design to me and it reeks of lazy implementation.

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

448 users are online: 448 guests
1 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
74 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53340
Welcome our newest member, parinitichopra
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM