You mean.... like commandos, thompson paras, shock trops etc...(Such tactics. Many micro)? No, we don't need those.Yes, that was absolutely, 100%, precisely, unironically, what I meant. "I guess you want to have infantry that takes zero thinking to use, like the other factions have". That the point of that sentence. You interpreteded it in a correct manner. Points for reading comprehension, I guess?
If you are unhappy with Panzergrenadiers that's okay, but they are good. They are not commandos, but then, they are cheaper and non-doctrinal.
Shock troops, rangers etc. are a bludgeon. Swing and hope you hit something. Panzergrenadiers are a scimitar. They need to be wielded with finesse. It's not micro tax, it's using cover, which you should be doing. They are defensive infantry, they bleed if used as assault troops without support. Yes, they require more thought and tactics to use properly than Shocktroops do. Yes, this means Allied players have more infantry versatility at their disposal. Yes, I understand you think that is unfair towards Ostheer.
Did you seriously ever have a situation "damn I could really use right now some sort of shocktrooper equivalent to just wreck that .50cal wall the US player used to lock down half the map."