This unit is OP now in terms of cost-effectiveness.Its massive pen buff allowed it to replace su-85 to a large extent..it is DIRT cheap,has 60 range (more than stug ).But worst of all is that it counters its counters.Anti-tank guns are a common counter to tank destroyers,but often this unit will barrage out of darkness.
Barrage frequency is high.
Barrage costs NOTHING,unlike zis.
Either -
1.Increase cost of unit
or
2.Munition price for barrage
or
3.Range to 50
or
4.Penetration reduction(pz 4 has 110 penetration)
In 2 vs 2 soviet spam it every game.
Nerf su-76 barrage
3 Nov 2015, 12:35 PM
#1
Posts: 1705
3 Nov 2015, 12:43 PM
#2
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
they are kinda fast and mobile too, have a nice pathing/turn very well
3 Nov 2015, 12:45 PM
#3
Posts: 1487
only idiot can say it imo. make trash worse. its not gonna happen. and it wont help you any way since normal players dont use su76 ussualy.
barrage range to 50
barrage range to 50
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
3 Nov 2015, 12:48 PM
#4
2 
Posts: 1108
austerlitz pls..... this unit was utterly trash before he gets some love. The barrage and su76 itself are fine.
| Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
3 Nov 2015, 12:56 PM
#5
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
The barrage it's fine. Let's not overreact over it.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
3 Nov 2015, 13:02 PM
#6
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Barrage from min range can one shot 4 man squads consistently.
Disagree. Pathing and turn rate is quite meh.
they are kinda fast and mobile too, have a nice pathing/turn very well
Disagree. Pathing and turn rate is quite meh.
3 Nov 2015, 13:21 PM
#7
Posts: 1705
That su-76 overperforms for cost i think is known by now.When they buffed it range should hav been reduced or barrage given a cost.
3 Nov 2015, 13:49 PM
#8
1 
Posts: 2885
Its like saying pzwerfer is OP now. Both units were trash and both got slight buff. Now both are quite ok but very cumbersome to use and su76 is also either very micro intensive or dead. If it got any of the nerfs you propose it should also get more health and/or much faster rotation.
3 Nov 2015, 14:13 PM
#9
3 
Posts: 587
Hhhmm what was the last time SU-76 was OP before it got its recent buff?, because i dont remember....unless i think about CPT.Price getting like 10 of them and unleashing hell, with a massive artillery bombardment
3 Nov 2015, 14:20 PM
#10
Posts: 238
The barrage it's fine. Let's not overreact over it.
Coming from this german fanboy, you know it must be true.
3 Nov 2015, 15:04 PM
#11
Posts: 219
Barrage needs and ammo cost, it's ridiculous that it's free.
| Playercard of Ace of Swords | |||||||||||||||||||
|
3 Nov 2015, 15:57 PM
#12
Posts: 954
Coming from this german fanboy, you know it must be true.
True. It's fine, move along
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
3 Nov 2015, 16:08 PM
#13
3 Posts: 587
Ammo cost for SU-76 barrage would double its damage to 240 and give it 1000 penetration Kreygasm
3 Nov 2015, 16:34 PM
#14
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
It should had -20pen across the board and it would be fine.
It been a replacement to the Su85 is a matter of T4 been a tad expensive for the performance of the units.
It been a replacement to the Su85 is a matter of T4 been a tad expensive for the performance of the units.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
3 Nov 2015, 16:48 PM
#15
Posts: 2070
su76 is fine. the barrage is highly inaccurate, unless you are using it from medium to close range.
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
3 Nov 2015, 17:03 PM
#16
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedImo its fine, only its can cost ammo if thay buff barrage. In olds patch and alpha i play with partisans and use doc ability to find opponent units to shoot tham from su-76 and i kill so many units MVGame.
Relic killing our game, lets save COH2 from Relic 
If you're not a ахіs lover when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a soviet fanboy by the time you're 30, you have no brain.
Relic delenda est
If Dane will be have son, he will be call him (Sturmgeschütz)
Brotheres, what we do in coh2, ehoes in eternity
If you're not a ахіs lover when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a soviet fanboy by the time you're 30, you have no brain.
Relic delenda est
If Dane will be have son, he will be call him (Sturmgeschütz)
Brotheres, what we do in coh2, ehoes in eternity
3 Nov 2015, 17:06 PM
#17
3 
Posts: 545
For the barrage to work you have to be point blank, with new damage models to buildings it will not displace MG's or infantry in buildings either. Its highly vulnerable to infantry based AT, AT guns, has low Armour/HP and no turret. Non Issue.
3 Nov 2015, 17:15 PM
#18
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Forever alone 
3 Nov 2015, 17:30 PM
#19
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It should had -20pen across the board and it would be fine.
It been a replacement to the Su85 is a matter of T4 been a tad expensive for the performance of the units.
That says more about the state of T4 tbh.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
3 Nov 2015, 19:47 PM
#20
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Coming from this german fanboy, you know it must be true.
Fanboy or not I am objective. Period. And I play all factions. Except for brits wich I didn't buy.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
40 | ||
 |
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.618222.736+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
743 users are online:
743 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49141
Welcome our newest member, igryskoj24
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, igryskoj24
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM