Posts: 1930
Pretty fun watching you qq on the forums rather than learning to play
6 pounder is a direct clone of the pak fyi, kinda funny to see people get salty over it and call Axis AT crap in the same post.
Posts: 1705
Posts: 166
Posts: 959
Always funny to see when your P4 loses a 1vs1 vs a M10 that costs 80 fuel.
Posts: 862
Totally agreed! I actually thought about making a thread about that too. From a 2vs2 perspective Germans are not playable any longer. The player search rate has gone up to a solid 75% Allies. Pretty good indicator for what is going on right now..
Posts: 2779
I played some Ost and really don't see this...
Posts: 362
Posts: 589
This is completely impossible. We were all quite assured that several patches ago the reason the search rate was 90-10 was not because there was an imbalance and people wanted to win but simply because axis are cool!
If you are right.... people want to win and played axis because they were OP. But....
Posts: 1954
Lostheer unable to win team games because grens scale worse than allie infantry, while bleeding more (30 mp reinforce vs 28). Received accuracy vet of allies makes lmg42 rather week and unless you have a good sniper micro you can forget about winning infantry engagements.
P4 overpriced at 125 fuel, while being worse than cromwells and shermans that cost less. Always funny to see when your P4 loses a 1vs1 vs a M10 that costs 80 fuel.
T4 too expensive to build and the Brummbär is just too expensive to be useful.
There are people that still think ostheer would be op if they could built gren cover
Right now you only win as Ostheer when your opponents makes too many mistakes, in a equal game double ost vs allie combinations I don't see much chances and obviously other top 150 players also don't know what to do.
Posts: 2779
Here is a great thread from the past:
http://www.coh2.org/topic/36266/balance-data-since-the-patch/page/13
So when the axis were on top, the win/loss stats were meaningless and the problem was either the data set, arranged teams vs random, or some other argument that really meant that people who play allies were deficient. Now that the win ratios are close, the game is broken and these stats are really, really important, especially if an Allied win ratio is marginally larger than an Axis one.
Most of you who are crying now thought the game was great when there was a 30% spread in 4v4 win rates.
Posts: 61
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
4vs4 balance
1 Posts: 412
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
who made this guy strategist?!! l2p
It's always funny too to see when your IS2 loses to a jp4 that cost 135 fuel! kappa
not that this situation happens often since both units can't be spammed a nearly always fight against each other in combined arms engagements. 
Posts: 363
Posts: 500
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Obers at release were considered overpowered, yet we have units that have close to twice their dps as well as more models.
Posts: 823 | Subs: 3
Posts: 2779
Posts: 363
Most evidence is ignored and most things are unbalanced because they are simply axis.
Just as an example: the few smoke abilities Axis had was considered op and a out of jail free card, yet the numerous smoke functions on allied infantry as well as tanks is considered vital and ok.
440 mp 'elite' unit that loses to a 280mp baseline infantry unit can hardly be considered elite, no?
 |
|
|
84 | ||
 |
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
579 | ||
 |
|
|
66 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
17 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
