Login

russian armor

Rangers

30 Oct 2015, 02:53 AM
#1
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

holy shit has anyone got the stats for these guys? Just played a couple of games and they were melting vet obers and sturms like swiss cheese, they feel like some sort of shock troop/commando hybrid rape machines that refuse to die
30 Oct 2015, 02:54 AM
#2
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 02:53 AMRollo
holy shit has anyone got the stats for these guys? Just played a couple of games and they were melting vet obers and sturms like swiss cheese, they feel like some sort of shock troop/commando hybrid rape machines that refuse to die

Everything is fine. rangers 2v1 most squads. But its fine. Do not worry. They are like paratroopers.
30 Oct 2015, 03:00 AM
#3
avatar of IGOR

Posts: 228

nerf it and nerf the pershing too , that 800 hp its too much...
30 Oct 2015, 04:04 AM
#4
avatar of Dr. Green Thumb

Posts: 132

I'm confused as to how the community doesn't get $ega's business practices yet. Put in a really powerful commander, get the masses to buy it, have Relic clean up the mess later.

They have been selling overpowered units/commanders for two years now, only to be nerfed into somewhat of a balance by Relic a few months after release. Vanguard, Brits, Elite troops, mechanized assault. Now this.
30 Oct 2015, 04:17 AM
#5
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Honestly airborne is better.
30 Oct 2015, 04:30 AM
#6
avatar of wandererraven

Posts: 353

some Ranger stats From attribute Editor

Reforce Cost 32.5 per man
Have Target size 0.8 It mean Passive Rec Acc 0.8
M1 Carbine same stats form para but use new weapon Profile (by copy form para)
Thompson same stats form para
And last thing Ranger only unit have " 3 Weapon slot " (normal 2 and only Guard troop have 4 )
it mean after up Thompson Ranger have 1 extra weapon replace M1 carbine
or use 3 Bar or 3 Zook
30 Oct 2015, 04:48 AM
#7
avatar of wafive

Posts: 36

their ability are only throw grenade xD
30 Oct 2015, 04:52 AM
#8
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 02:53 AMRollo
holy shit has anyone got the stats for these guys? Just played a couple of games and they were melting vet obers and sturms like swiss cheese, they feel like some sort of shock troop/commando hybrid rape machines that refuse to die


i mean if shocks get close theyll cut up obers and sturms too.
30 Oct 2015, 04:55 AM
#9
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

I think they are fine
30 Oct 2015, 05:10 AM
#10
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

Paratroopers are better. And cheaper.
30 Oct 2015, 07:10 AM
#11
avatar of SpaceHamster
Patrion 14

Posts: 474

I cry every time a thompson upgrade doesn't come with tactical assault.

Oh well, into my only build once or in 4v4's list you go.
30 Oct 2015, 07:22 AM
#12
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

Just don't let them close in. I hope that they're not like prenerf commandos in close range. 5v1 and win Kappa
30 Oct 2015, 07:23 AM
#13
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959

what's the difference between shocks and ranges in lethality and armour?!!!
30 Oct 2015, 07:24 AM
#14
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

Where is the big Red 1 complaining that they totally suck and lose to Ost Pios? O.o
30 Oct 2015, 07:27 AM
#15
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3

I find them pretty ok.
30 Oct 2015, 07:35 AM
#16
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Airbornes are better.
30 Oct 2015, 07:39 AM
#17
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 07:23 AMAladdin
what's the difference between shocks and ranges in lethality and armour?!!!
Shocks are more durable. Rangers have better dps, especially at mid range.
30 Oct 2015, 07:44 AM
#18
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225

Strong squad but not batshit broken for cost, except that they should have max one weapon slot. Fairly decent design by relic for once.
30 Oct 2015, 08:07 AM
#19
avatar of WeißAlchimist

Posts: 112

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 02:53 AMRollo
holy shit has anyone got the stats for these guys? Just played a couple of games and they were melting vet obers and sturms like swiss cheese, they feel like some sort of shock troop/commando hybrid rape machines that refuse to die


Lol, I had 2 squads stand in volks flamenades, and still wipe the 4 volks squads.

With 2 sturmpios flaming them too.

Rangers have fireproof skin.
30 Oct 2015, 08:08 AM
#20
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Newsflash:

Paras are better and cheaper, have more dps and better survivability vs non small arms weapons while being comparably durable vs small arms.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

842 users are online: 842 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50026
Welcome our newest member, cpbigshipnet
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM