![](http://assets.companyofheroes.com/sites/default/files/chart_q1_151021.png)
![](http://assets.companyofheroes.com/sites/default/files/chart_q2_151021.png)
http://www.companyofheroes.com/blog/2015/10/22/coh2-name-your-commanders-contest-winners
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
Posts: 279
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Heavy Cavalry is good, but Firestorm just sounds cheesy. Ugh. I wish Incendiary Field Support won. It was the most accurate name. Or Incendiary Assault at least.Silver-lining - Hellstorm didn't get it.
Posts: 344
Heavy Cavalry is good, but Firestorm just sounds cheesy. Ugh. I wish Incendiary Field Support won. It was the most accurate name. Or Incendiary Assault at least.
Posts: 1617
Posts: 276
So, if my name suggestion is on the list I get the company?
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Posts: 61
Feuersturm is pretty dumb taking into account this term is used to describe allied bombing runs on German Cities during WW2.
Posts: 1702
Feuersturm is pretty dumb taking into account this term is used to describe allied bombing runs on German Cities during WW2.
Cavarly makes no sense since the commander has nothing 'Cavalry' like in it like a halftrack
Posts: 1617
If you were the first who wrote the suggestion, yes.
Relic added a line into the rules stating this on monday iirc
Posts: 1227 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1216
Posts: 556
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Posts: 641 | Subs: 1
Give the commanders to the people who thought up the winning names, after that think of some better ones.. and use those instead.
Posts: 46
Posts: 179
Posts: 65
So, naming was community based, there was a voting, the community decided... And now there are a lot of people complaining?! WTF?! Sometimes I doubt that Relic is able to do just one thing correctly according to the community... I´d love to see some support for the developers at least.
Posts: 371
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |