Does the T-34/76 need love?
17 Oct 2015, 09:07 AM
#81
Posts: 91
Unlocked option in tier 0 to do a discounted pack of two t3476 (tech needed)
17 Oct 2015, 09:58 AM
#82
Posts: 166
swap T-34/76 with T-34/85, it's late 1944 FFS
Its in the game and costs more than a Panzer V and is weaker in everyway.
The 85 needs a buff along with the 76
17 Oct 2015, 10:04 AM
#83
8
Posts: 2470
what? the 34/85 is really fine. it's not as good against tanks as the V but it's cheaper and has good AI performance.
17 Oct 2015, 10:24 AM
#84
Posts: 1158
I think the 76 has always been marred by this issue of how effective it is vs how quickly it gets lost. German AT knocks this thing out in a single second sometimes. The armor is absolutely worthless. The gun does not wreck infantry or tanks. The tank itself is not really that fast. It's just good at nothing. On top of that, you can't really spam it, because the pop cap is high enough to where you can only get about 3 or 4 of these sub par tanks.
17 Oct 2015, 10:52 AM
#85
Posts: 770
Its in the game and costs more than a Panzer V and is weaker in everyway.
The 85 needs a buff along with the 76
The amount of stupid bias in your posts is really starting to irk me. the 85 is superior to the p4 in both hp and penetration and unless the rng god is pissed at you the 85 will win any engagement with the p4. also the 85 is better at AI because of lower scatter
17 Oct 2015, 10:54 AM
#86
Posts: 770
I think the 76 has always been marred by this issue of how effective it is vs how quickly it gets lost. German AT knocks this thing out in a single second sometimes. The armor is absolutely worthless. The gun does not wreck infantry or tanks. The tank itself is not really that fast. It's just good at nothing. On top of that, you can't really spam it, because the pop cap is high enough to where you can only get about 3 or 4 of these sub par tanks.
Newsflash : AT is meant to destroy medium tanks. And what low lever are you playing where you think its a good idea to spam generalist medium tanks? no faction spams generalist medium tanks any more.
17 Oct 2015, 17:01 PM
#87
Posts: 166
what? the 34/85 is really fine. it's not as good against tanks as the V but it's cheaper and has good AI performance.
It is not cheaper and is not better at AI.
17 Oct 2015, 17:14 PM
#88
Posts: 103
It should be in T3 and cost increased.
19 Oct 2015, 04:10 AM
#89
Posts: 503
Just put it into T3 again. It is a worse shock unit to infantry than AA HT or T70
Unit anyway LOL.
Unit anyway LOL.
19 Oct 2015, 06:34 AM
#90
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1
It is not cheaper and is not better at AI [than the Panzer V].
There's a pretty good WW2 RTS on the market- you might have heard of it, but I'm guessing you haven't played it from the comments you've been making. It's called Company of Heroes 2.
Panther: 175 fuel
T-34/85: 130 fuel
..and that doesn't even include tech cost.
Panther: 0.5 AoE radius
T-34/86: 2.5 AoE radius
not taking into account scatter, which makes the Panther even worse at taking on infantry.
19 Oct 2015, 06:48 AM
#91
Posts: 166
Panther: 175 fuel
T-34/85: 130 fuel
not taking into account scatter, which makes the Panther even worse at taking on infantry.
*Meant the Panzer IV. Somehow missed the I.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
9 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1121623.643+2
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
10
Download
1244
Board Info
906 users are online:
1 member and 905 guests
aerafield
aerafield
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49400
Welcome our newest member, praptitourism
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, praptitourism
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM