Posts: 503
I don't like the idea, it will just promote spam and blob with no consequences if you get counter played.
Spam T0 units into withdraw to spam T2 units into withdraw into spam t3 units etc...
Posts: 1484
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
4 
Posts: 128
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 154 | Subs: 2
1 
Posts: 2885
Well you should be able to destroy / remove certain units, but getting a refund for it? That would change coh2 in a bad matter. If you build a unit, be sure why you build it, otherwise it is your own fault and you deserve to be punished for it. :-D
Posts: 1384
4 
Posts: 369
Also should not apply to any structures. You shouldn't be able to deny your opponent XP by blowing up your own stuff. (Like mg bunkers that are going to die anyway)
Posts: 166
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Pretty inefficient strategy if you are only getting back 33% to 50% of your resources don't you think?
Posts: 503
inefficient if you don't take advantage of your spam. But if spaming T1 units gives you control on 70% of the map and then you can switch into spaming t2, it is efficient.
Posts: 758
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Maybe, I'm skeptical that you can gain enough of an advantage by spamming so hard and then withdrawing many units. Conscripts already can merge to reduce pop cap and make effective forces anew, granted you do not get a resource bonus but con:Max spam no longer works against good player and penal spam is just LOL bad
Posts: 688
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
233 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
