Login

russian armor

Has the M8 gotten worse?

8 Sep 2015, 01:35 AM
#1
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Was using the M8 in my last match, and it didn't seem like it was doing all that well. Even direct hits didn't seem to kill infantry.

Has the US's already terrible indirect gotten even worse?
8 Sep 2015, 01:39 AM
#2
avatar of Kothre

Posts: 431

I think I remember Cruzz saying its shells got reduced AoE.
8 Sep 2015, 01:42 AM
#3
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 01:39 AMKothre
I think I remember Cruzz saying its shells got reduced AoE.


Thank god, now axis might stand a chance against USF late game.
8 Sep 2015, 01:47 AM
#4
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Sigh... Why is this crummy thing even a non-doctrinal. Every other faction gets an awesome rocket artillery, and USF is stuck with a glorified mortar on treads.
8 Sep 2015, 03:00 AM
#5
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

Well UKF gets no significant arty at all, just the crummy base howitzers you need to throw flares to fire and the Sexton which is worse than the priest in every meaningful way.

GIVE CALLIOPE

Land mattress for brits is optional
8 Sep 2015, 03:29 AM
#6
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

wait this is the pack howitzer right? I thought it still just sucked :S

I built like 3 for the first time in 10 months and they got about 10 kills total(seperate games)
8 Sep 2015, 03:36 AM
#7
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

Price buff to 50 fuel Kappa
8 Sep 2015, 03:47 AM
#8
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

wait this is the pack howitzer right? I thought it still just sucked :S

I built like 3 for the first time in 10 months and they got about 10 kills total(seperate games)
No the M8 scott. The T4 indirect unit.
8 Sep 2015, 04:00 AM
#9
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

No the M8 scott. The T4 indirect unit.

O ya i havn't built any of those in 10 months either :romeoPro:
8 Sep 2015, 04:18 AM
#10
avatar of Kothre

Posts: 431

I honestly never built Scotts, even when people whined about them being OP.
8 Sep 2015, 05:19 AM
#11
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 04:18 AMKothre
I honestly never built Scotts, even when people whined about them being OP.


they were sooooo worth it when they came out and had direct fire trajectory, but after that they couldn't be used vs vehicles and became less effective vs infantry. But since that change Shermans have been better at map control and getting kills even considering the price difference

regardless the nerf was highly unecessary
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

776 users are online: 776 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM