Balance Preview Update 09/04/2015

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 21:30 PMCookiezNcreem

I guess....since they're limited to one now.

But dont forget USF here,what do they do vs a vet 2 tiger? surrender?

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 21:37 PMMr. Someguy

Except Tigers didn't have schurzen, so adding it would have no real-life references and be pure fiction.

But dont forget USF here,what do they do vs a vet 2 tiger? surrender?

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 22:13 PMAlexzandvar

See: w/e. Just an increase in health would be fine and would fit with it's dynamic as Ostheers big brawler tank. It also shouldn't have Blitz but instead an ability that can be toggled to slow it's movement speed but give it a smaller target size.



It's almost as if the very changes to USF in the OP are to make USF late game better.....woah

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 18:56 PMBanillo

how does the molotov compare to the new volks nade?

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 21:30 PMCookiezNcreem

I guess....since they're limited to one now.

But dont forget USF here,what do they do vs a vet 2 tiger? surrender?

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 23:27 PMRedT3rror

Those changes did not affect their ability to fend off heavy tanks. The cannon of a Tiger doesn't care about the vet3 received accuracy of a Rifle or the higher dps of the BAR they are holding in their hands.

As a quick reminder, if the Tiger I gets 55 range

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:18 AMQueenRatchet123

LOL at this retarded open ended bullshit

Heavies fuck usf sooo harrd. PERIOD!

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:12 AMAladdin

About the Tiger change.
The cries are all from the USF fanboys cause they don't want the useless Tiger, costing 230 fuel/640 mp coming at 13 Cp, stands up to its cost, time it arrives to the game and have any impact in the game.
at the moment, tiger by no means justifies its price and does not impact the game enough as a reliable heavy tank.
To all the crying allies fanboys, Tiger is (supposed to be) a goddamn heavy tank.
Oh and btw if you forgot it costs the same as an IS2 and yet ...

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:21 AMAladdin

I'm sure you (and everyone) know how useless Tiger is atm, for the time it comes, its price and its impact on the game (for its performance) .

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:12 AMAladdin

About the Tiger change.
The cries are all from the USF fanboys cause they don't want the useless Tiger, costing 230 fuel/640 mp coming at 13 Cp, stands up to its cost, time it arrives to the game and have any impact in the game.
at the moment, tiger by no means justifies its price and does not impact the game enough as a reliable heavy tank.
To all the crying allies fanboys, Tiger is (supposed to be) a goddamn heavy tank.
Oh and btw if you forgot it costs the same as an IS2 and yet ...

Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 14:19 PM__deleted__

USA and UKF counters to early vehilce with armor stronger than kubel ?

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:37 AMCookiezNcreem

with your 0-1 record as usf.....

the tiger is far from "not having an impact on the game" vs usf. If you think thats the case,you can gladly play USF vs my ostheer and ill do nothing but gren spam MG spam pak wall into tiger. I'd LOVE to see how well you do. I doubt you even last long enough for me to get a tiger.

The Jackson is supposed to be a 'god damn' tank destroyer(In other words,it destroys Krupp Stehl tigers,yes,the tiger is a tank, not the second coming of God.) but yet with this change a vetted tiger(Not uncommon in long games vs usf) will basically have the same range. It will have more range than every other USF tank(including the m10,a 'god damn' tank destroyer) when vetted,and unvetted will still have more range than most USF tanks.

Like Imagelessbean (A respectable 4v4 axis player) said,This basically means jacksons have to be reversing at all times vs tigers,or they die. If the tiger is vetted,they die.

This means you cannot use shermans at all around a tiger,which means you lose.

So before you go spouting off about people "crying",why dont you step out of 4v4 axis land and actually play with a faction before you shit-talk it.

Just because 4v4 brits are OP with their flamer churchills,comets,fireflies,and carpet bombing runs,and soviets have 1 tank that actually stands up to tigers head to head(not with this change it wont),doesnt mean the tiger needs to be some god-send tank all the sudden.

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:23 AMOmega_Warrior

It could already deal with every allied tank other then the IS-2 just fine. YOu act like the title of heavy tank gives it some god given right to trounce everything it's opponent can send at it. Even it's counters.

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:28 AMQueenRatchet123

Ive NEVER had issues with the tiger! Its more consistent that any other heavy in coh2! LEarn how to use it.

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 04:13 AMAladdin

No man, I just compare it to the other heavy tanks in the game! why should I pay 230 fuel/640 mp wait till 13 cp and choose its doctrine for such a piece of junk!

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 04:13 AMAladdin

No man, I just compare it to the other heavy tanks in the game! why should I pay 230 fuel/640 mp wait till 13 cp and choose its doctrine for such a piece of junk!

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 03:12 AMAladdin

About the Tiger change.
The cries are all from the USF fanboys cause they don't want the useless Tiger, costing 230 fuel/640 mp coming at 13 Cp, stands up to its cost, time it arrives to the game and have any impact in the game.
at the moment, tiger by no means justifies its price and does not impact the game enough as a reliable heavy tank.
To all the crying allies fanboys, Tiger is (supposed to be) a goddamn heavy tank.
Oh and btw if you forgot it costs the same as an IS2 and yet ...