Swap T-34/76 with 85?
Posts: 508
T-34/76 could get added to the doctrines that currently use T-34/85 and maybe get a recon mode as a small buff to represent elite armor groups having better scouting. Or it could just get moved to T3 to give those doctrines a little more armor flexibility. Or whatever would balance that out. I'm arguing this for reasons of theme and enjoyment, not balance per se, though I would of course only want this change if a way could be found to make it balanced.
USF uses Shermans and Jacksons, not M3 Lees or whatever.
The Germans get P4s as their main tank, not P3s.
Why should Soviets get stuck with T-34/76s? I know the factions are asymmetrical, but "this faction's asymmetry is that it's lame and relies heavily on cheese to win" is not the fun kind of asymmetry.
Posts: 1701
Posts: 1617
Posts: 2561
But at this point it would mess up balancing. Id rather just give the t34/76 a few buffs.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
But at this point it would mess up balancing. Id rather just give the t34/76 a few buffs.
Not for 80 fuel
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Nah, its excellent tank, I use it everytime I can
With that pure Aryan playercard of yours?
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 618
Nah, its excellent tank, I use it everytime I can
The one time you played a match as Allies you mean?
Posts: 2561
Not for 80 fuel
no for maybe 90 fuel. Cheap isn't worth much if they suck.
Posts: 2819
t34/85, su85 and katyusha would be a bit too ridiculous
Agreed
Posts: 98
Posts: 1276
Its an alright tank but Its AI scatter could be reduced to put it slightly on par with he p4.
Posts: 270 | Subs: 1
It would give you a choice between having the SU-76 which is better vs armor but dies easier or having the T-34 which is generally more survivable and better at killing infantry.
Of course it would have to have its 80 fuel cost adjusted but hopefully would reduce the SU-76 reliance
Posts: 830
Then Panzerwerfer with slight buffs could be put in t3 and Elefant could be moved to T4 with 20% fuel increase!
Posts: 412
Nah, its excellent tank, I use it everytime I can
So how was it using it that one to four times you played soviets?
Kappa
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Course if its a 50/50 match or the game drags on they scale like crap and SU-76s are so damn cost effective that T34/76s are very situational at best. They'd be better if they tweaked the Veterancy a bit and swapped out some of the Reload speed with either scatter decrease or penetration increase so that they can, you know, actually deal with Vetted/Heavy Armor somewhat more reliably.
Posts: 1063
Posts: 959
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I don't really think it's a good idea. Shocks + IS-2 + T-34/85 or Guards + ISU-152 and t-34/85s? No. It'd make some doctrines indirectly OP IMO.
I don't think there is soviet upgrade for direct link with Caucasus oil fields to make it possible to afford such combos.
Also combos like this are already present in 3v3 and 4v4, allies are still losing miserably.
Posts: 600
Livestreams
27 | |||||
888 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, sunwinctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM