Here you can see massive FPS gains in a strategy game(Thats CPU intensive), maybe this would greatly benefit COH 2 FPS.
Question is... Shall Relic make dx12 available for coh 2?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuUcIfcMDtc
Shall COH 2 support dx12?
18 Aug 2015, 07:31 AM
#1
Posts: 179
18 Aug 2015, 07:41 AM
#2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
But you do realize that almost no game at all supports it?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
18 Aug 2015, 07:47 AM
#3
Posts: 1740
I don't think that DX12 could solve the problems with the sucky FPS.
The main problem is that CoH2 is programmed very poorly. It could have way better FPS even without DX12 if it wasn't implemented the way it is.
I have a GTX970 and a brand new i5 and still I lag after a US phosphor barrage.
Whoever is without sin casts the first stone.
Someone has to start my dear Katitof.
And in addition vCoH implemented DX10 with a major update (OF) that brought many new effects.
So it is possible.
The main problem is that CoH2 is programmed very poorly. It could have way better FPS even without DX12 if it wasn't implemented the way it is.
I have a GTX970 and a brand new i5 and still I lag after a US phosphor barrage.
But you do realize that almost no game at all supports it?
Whoever is without sin casts the first stone.
Someone has to start my dear Katitof.
And in addition vCoH implemented DX10 with a major update (OF) that brought many new effects.
So it is possible.
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
18 Aug 2015, 07:51 AM
#4
Posts: 2819
But you do realize that almost no game at all supports it?
Not yet. Kinda normal when it has just been released
OT: I think so, they announced a new way of animation so I hope it has something to do with that.
Anyway, the GPU's need to be able to support is first of cours.
All posts made are about situations in 2v2's. Not a 1v1 player.
18 Aug 2015, 16:12 PM
#5
1 
Posts: 640
I hope they will release a great performance/graphic patch (DX12 support) within the release of the UKF
 | Playercard of SwonVIP | |||||||||||||||
|
18 Aug 2015, 17:58 PM
#6
Posts: 521
where the "i dont know" option
18 Aug 2015, 18:16 PM
#7
4 Posts: 1006
I have a GTX970 and a brand new i5 and still I lag after a US phosphor barrage.
I hope you are kidding
\
/ \
/
/ \/
19 Aug 2015, 05:59 AM
#8
Posts: 1740
I hope you are kidding
Unfortunately I am not...
My PC can handle the game very well but somehow it goes down in massive fire and smoke.
I can play GTA V in maxed out settings with full AA and so on so it seems as my point is correct that CoH2 is simply coded pretty poorly :/
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
19 Aug 2015, 07:06 AM
#9
8 Posts: 2470
frankly i don't really care whether or not they update the engine (they won't, it's a shit ton of work), as i won't be getting win10 for a while, but i wouldn't say no to it. i'm sure relic's next game will be dx11/12 based.
i don't think we'll get straight 12 games for at least another 2 years, just because the market is too small until win10 get's some saturation.
i don't think we'll get straight 12 games for at least another 2 years, just because the market is too small until win10 get's some saturation.
19 Aug 2015, 07:09 AM
#10
Posts: 1891
Just use sweetfx, people
The Fascisti Will Pay.
19 Aug 2015, 07:19 AM
#11
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Horrible optimization. Aka no optimization. Relic need to optimize the game, not make it work properly only on Top high-end computers. WTF, we are home users not NASA.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
19 Aug 2015, 07:47 AM
#12
1 Posts: 77
Relic has a very shit way of creating particals. So usually fire/smoke/effects will cause most pcs to limp I believe.
I'm really "good" at video games.
19 Aug 2015, 08:12 AM
#13
51 
Posts: 51
I don't think that DX12 could solve the problems with the sucky FPS.
The main problem is that CoH2 is programmed very poorly. It could have way better FPS even without DX12 if it wasn't implemented the way it is.
I have a GTX970 and a brand new i5 and still I lag after a US phosphor barrage.
Whoever is without sin casts the first stone.
Someone has to start my dear Katitof.
And in addition vCoH implemented DX10 with a major update (OF) that brought many new effects.
So it is possible.
I hope you are kidding
There is something seriously wrong with your pc if this the case.
On the point dx12 its not gonna happen costs money and makes no money
19 Aug 2015, 09:13 AM
#14
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I wouldn't mind, but there are a lot of performance issues (duh!), most notably UI. You can't even open the freaking tactical map without game freezing for a couple of seconds.
19 Aug 2015, 09:21 AM
#15
Posts: 670
dx12? ain't one forcing himself to use a botnet operating system. with linux and macos versions in days, opengl and vulkan will be the way to go.
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
19 Aug 2015, 09:26 AM
#16
Posts: 2819
I have a GTX970 and a brand new i5 and still I lag after a US phosphor barrage.
Newest I5 (6600k) and GTX 970 Gaming right here, and indeed. Still a bit of lag with that.
Absurd.
All posts made are about situations in 2v2's. Not a 1v1 player.
19 Aug 2015, 18:53 PM
#17
1 
Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
DX10 was supposed to bring better performance and we all know how the DX10 patch was for COH1.
19 Aug 2015, 19:02 PM
#18
26 Posts: 53
I have a 4770k i7 Ivy and a GTX 680 and run the game on max, averaging 45 fps. sometimes it slows down but not too bad. I'm also using a 480GB SSHD.
But my game was running like ass for a while, so I did a fresh format and that seemed to help a ton.
But my game was running like ass for a while, so I did a fresh format and that seemed to help a ton.
Keep Reversing Man!!!
19 Aug 2015, 19:31 PM
#19
Posts: 194
Newest I5 (6600k) and GTX 970 Gaming right here, and indeed. Still a bit of lag with that.
Absurd.
you merely adopted to low fps. I was born in it, molded by it. I didnot see the 30 fps number on my monitor until i was already a man.
One day i will have a PC like yours, oh one day... :heavy breath:
20 Aug 2015, 03:18 AM
#20
8 Posts: 2470
Relic has a very shit way of creating particals. So usually fire/smoke/effects will cause most pcs to limp I believe.
all particles are expensive (shit ton of 2 tri/1 poly squares suddenly everywhere) and coh2 isn't really optimized.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
Offline
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615222.735-2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
793 users are online:
1 member and 792 guests
eventquip
eventquip
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49138
Welcome our newest member, trevinehickman
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, trevinehickman
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM