Recommended WW2 reads
Posts: 758
Posts: 314
Posts: 525
Posts: 113
Posts: 758
With The Old Breed by Eugene Sledge is a must read. The definitive WW2 Pacific Theatermemoir, IMO, and probably my favourite military memoir to date. I've yet to find someone who so humanly captures the horror as Sledge did in his writing.
if i am not mistaken that book was adapted into an epic miniseries called The Pacific I watched and have a DVD of it =)
Posts: 113
if i am not mistaken that book was adapted into an epic miniseries called The Pacific I watched and have a DVD of it =)
Sure was.
I went and read all the books the miniseries was based off after watching it. Robert Leckie's Helmet for my Pillow is also a great read.
Posts: 609
For large scale analysis Absolute War about soviet/axis war was fascinating focusing on the ideological nature of the eastern front battle and how the two powers handled it. I know Quinn Duffy drew on this heavily - it includes the account of a t34 ram destroying a tiger and has a lot of detail on the stuff that our Russian friends found so objectionable due to their referencing in game.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 372
Darby's Rangers: We Led the Way
Storming Eagles: German Airborne Forces in World War II
Monty and Rommel: Parallel Lives
Band of Brothers
Beyond Band of Brothers-this one is by Dick Winters
Hitler's Fortress Cherbourg: The Conquest of a Bastion
That's all I can get off the top of my head that hasn't been mentioned yet.
Posts: 372
The liberator about a U.S. Officer in an infantry regiment which travelled further than any other and was the first into dachau. It's excellent as a soldiers account but also helped me flesh out details of Anzio and the campaign in southern France which broader accounts have failed to do for me. It's also an extraordinary story if survival and very readable and entertaining to boot. Written by Alex kershaw.
For large scale analysis Absolute War about soviet/axis war was fascinating focusing on the ideological nature of the eastern front battle and how the two powers handled it. I know Quinn Duffy drew on this heavily - it includes the account of a t34 ram destroying a tiger and has a lot of detail on the stuff that our Russian friends found so objectionable due to their referencing in game.
What the Russian population found objectionable (and with good reason) is that fact that the campaign focuses on all the negative aspects of the Red Army while calling itself Company of Heroes.
Contrast that with the campaigns in the original game and even Ardennes Assault. Not a singe mention of anything but heroism.
Posts: 609
Posts: 618
What the Russian population found objectionable (and with good reason) is that fact that the campaign focuses on all the negative aspects of the Red Army while calling itself Company of Heroes.
Contrast that with the campaigns in the original game and even Ardennes Assault. Not a singe mention of anything but heroism.
IIRC the campaign showed the leadership being shit most of the time, not the ordinary soldiers, hence Company of Heroes still applies I think.
Posts: 862
It is not well written but it is a great look at the life of a US infantry company from Oct. '44 through. McDonald wrote it right after the war and this is why it is a valuable account. It is also his youth and inexperience as a writer that makes it a bit of a dry read.
He doesn't have axes to grind or a reputation he is trying to protect or redeem. He seems to just be trying to tell the story and do it with as much detail as possible. (required reading at West Point).
http://www.amazon.com/Company-Commander-Classic-Infantry-Memoir/dp/1580800386/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1438517469&sr=8-1&keywords=company+commander
Posts: 484
IIRC the campaign showed the leadership being shit most of the time, not the ordinary soldiers, hence Company of Heroes still applies I think.
Not really. It showed them as forced and unwilling, and thus as either suckers or victims. It was both ridiculous and spiteful.
I played the CoH1 campaign something like 5 times, but CoH2's was just too vile to get through even once.
Posts: 618
Not really. It showed them as forced and unwilling, and thus as either suckers or victims. It was both ridiculous and spiteful.
I played the CoH1 campaign something like 5 times, but CoH2's was just too vile to get through even once.
Ah right, fair enough.
I agree it got really ridiculous at some points (the cutscenes in the gulag rofl), I'm by no means saying it's very good.
Posts: 758
Moving to the Library
thanks i had no idea where to put this so i just randomize thank you once again =)
Posts: 372
Ah right, fair enough.
I agree it got really ridiculous at some points (the cutscenes in the gulag rofl), I'm by no means saying it's very good.
The part where you burn down the village with the civilians still inside their homes had me rolling. It was so ludicrous.
The part in Stalingrad where the commissar executes a bunch of soldiers for rescuing their decorated war hero captain was a close second.
How anyone though these were "heroic" is beyond me.
Posts: 188
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 3787
one or two its not about ww2
Livestreams
53 | |||||
346 | |||||
32 | |||||
30 | |||||
9 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM