Login

russian armor

Enable Soviets to skip T3

aaa
22 Jul 2015, 20:32 PM
#1
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487

There are games where T3 units are total waste. And you need other units not T3.
For instance at some point you see that he already have a ATG. If is not a lobster or blockhead he would just destroy your light vehicle and get decisive economic advantage.
So in this case there is no point of making T3 at all.

You have a T2 and in this case you need double sniper to deal with hordes of infantry and pak. After sniper (2 always better) you would surely need T4 units.

So you must be able to skip 1 tech building of your choice to build a T4.

They say they want 2 things

1. More viable builds
2. More usage of light vehivcles

So if they allow to make T4 after any 2 buildings both this goals would be accheaved.
There will be so much more different builds that its hard to list them all.
Always a light vehilce M3 or T3 unit.
22 Jul 2015, 20:35 PM
#2
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

22 Jul 2015, 20:39 PM
#3
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

T3 units are arguably more useful than T4 units. Like why would you want an SU-85 when you have SU-76's that have exactly the same pen. T4 isn't really 100% necessary until later in the game.
aaa
22 Jul 2015, 20:59 PM
#4
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487

Compared to T4 units T3 is just 3 thin cans with small guns.

T3 only can have window. At some point it becomes useless in any game. While T4 never gets useless.
22 Jul 2015, 21:05 PM
#5
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

aaa, you seem like a good guy, I like you. Please don't become the allied version of vetlolcake, johnnyB
22 Jul 2015, 21:14 PM
#6
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

aaa, you seem like a good guy, I like you. Please don't become the allied version of vetlolcake, johnnyB


He already is the allied version of vetlolcake.
22 Jul 2015, 21:16 PM
#7
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1



He already is the allied version of vetlolcake.


I thought that was Acelolcake :lol:
aaa
22 Jul 2015, 21:23 PM
#8
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487



He already is the allied version of vetlolcake.


Can you just ignore my posts etc. I didnt replay to your BS that you adresses to me constantly in hope that you would just f. off. I dont want to say that.
22 Jul 2015, 21:24 PM
#9
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

aaa..... just.... stop....
22 Jul 2015, 23:12 PM
#10
avatar of Barrier
Patrion 28

Posts: 146

No, the way it is now is better. Learn how to use light vehicles even if the enemy has a pak, they can be really useful.
22 Jul 2015, 23:16 PM
#11
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
aaa vs pussyking battle royale. Who will earn the title of allied lolcake.
22 Jul 2015, 23:21 PM
#12
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

No, because T3 does not cost the same as T1 or T2. A T1 + T2 approach would be cheaper and thus will quickly become the metagame, and T3 would be dead again.
22 Jul 2015, 23:26 PM
#13
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

aaa vs pussyking battle royale. Who will bring earn the title of allied lolcake.


lmfao XD
23 Jul 2015, 00:38 AM
#15
avatar of Stafkeh
Patrion 14

Posts: 1006

Leave it like it is please. I like it how it is now :guyokay:
23 Jul 2015, 00:44 AM
#16
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

No, I don't think there's many times Soviets' T3 will be a total waste.

Micro said units of T3 better.
23 Jul 2015, 03:33 AM
#17
avatar of Appleseed

Posts: 622

I love the New T3 it have everything I used most, SU76, T70, Quad M5, ever since they buff SU76 I don't use T34 anymore, and only some times SU85, since the new patch I only go over to T4 once to get a SU85 and Katyusha other than that SU76 is enough to counter any german armor throw at you.
23 Jul 2015, 04:14 AM
#18
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 20:32 PMaaa
There are games where T3 units are total waste. And you need other units not T3.
For instance at some point you see that he already have a ATG. If is not a lobster or blockhead he would just destroy your light vehicle and get decisive economic advantage.
So in this case there is no point of making T3 at all.

You have a T2 and in this case you need double sniper to deal with hordes of infantry and pak. After sniper (2 always better) you would surely need T4 units.

So you must be able to skip 1 tech building of your choice to build a T4. So why not make T4 available after any 2 buildings.


A 6:30 T-70/HT Quad is not a waste in any game of any size if you know how to use it.

And the SU76 is amazing.

Im not a fan of the phrase but this is a l2p issue.
23 Jul 2015, 07:24 AM
#19
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

aaa vs pussyking battle royale. Who will earn the title of allied lolcake.


We should definitely put a winner against johhnyb in a coh2 deathmatch.
aaa
23 Jul 2015, 07:33 AM
#20
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487

No, because T3 does not cost the same as T1 or T2. A T1 + T2 approach would be cheaper and thus will quickly become the metagame, and T3 would be dead again.


It wont be dead vs abusers cuz fast T70 is only way to punish heavy T1 play.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

913 users are online: 1 member and 912 guests
Brick Top
1 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50007
Welcome our newest member, Helzer96
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM