Because you're not factoring in 120mun.
Thats resource too, which bumps the cost.
FHT upgrade is 120 aswel.. yet nowhere close to as good as the quad...
FHT is 120 muni working as intended, Quad is 120 muni overperforming.
Posts: 600
Because you're not factoring in 120mun.
Thats resource too, which bumps the cost.
Posts: 824
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The Quad halftrack is pretty good vs infantry, but its also really good vs vehicles. It shreds everything, scout cars, halftracks, it can even kill a puma (with some support). That doesn't seem right to me.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned
All halftrucks do that tbh.
@Corsin
Isn't it 90? For a loooong time now? Pretty much since it was locked behind BP2?
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 493
Posts: 14
Permanently BannedPosts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 578
please show me a replay where you have a pak, multiple mines and panzerschrecks before a rushed M5 is raping your units
Posts: 578
The Quad halftrack is pretty good vs infantry, but its also really good vs vehicles. It shreds everything, scout cars, halftracks, it can even kill a puma (with some support). That doesn't seem right to me.
Posts: 18
What a stupid comment. I can also do that: Show me a replay where you had multiple personnel mines up before rushed sturmpios pushed you off a fuel point.
Posts: 393
Posts: 390 | Subs: 2
Posts: 509
Posts: 509
Posts: 4928
Posts: 587
Posts: 334
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Completely agree Sheepeh. It just arrives way too early, especially in 1v1. The Soviet meta of T2-T3-quad M5-T70/SU-76 is very, very potent against Ost. People who say otherwise are full of crap. Seriously.
Maybe if it's cost was increased to say, 55 fuel, and the quad upgrade cost was lowered a bit to compensate?
803 | |||||
113 | |||||
7 |